Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T01:01:08.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electrochemical Behavior of Carbon Electrodes for In Situ Redox Studies in a Transmission Electron Microscope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2019

Robin Girod ,
Nikolaos Nianias  and
Vasiliki Tileli Open the ORCID record for Vasiliki Tileli [Opens in a new window]
Robin Girod
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland
Nikolaos Nianias
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland
Vasiliki Tileli*
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland
*
*Author for correspondence: Vasiliki Tileli, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Electrochemical liquid cell transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is a unique technique for probing nanocatalyst behavior during operation for a range of different electrocatalytic processes, including hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), oxygen evolution reaction (OER), oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), or electrochemical CO2 reduction (eCO2R). A major challenge to the technique's applicability to these systems has to do with the choice of substrate, which requires a wide inert potential range for quantitative electrochemistry, and is also responsible for minimizing background gas generation in the confined microscale environment. Here, we report on the feasibility of electrochemical experiments using the standard redox couple Fe(CN)63−/4− and microchips featuring carbon-coated electrodes. We electrochemically assess the in situ performance with respect to flow rate, liquid volume, and scan rate. Equally important with the choice of working substrate is the choice of the reference electrode. We demonstrate that the use of a modified electrode setup allows for potential measurements relatable to bulk studies. Furthermore, we use this setup to demonstrate the inert potential range for carbon-coated electrodes in aqueous electrolytes for HER, OER, ORR, and eCO2R. This work provides a basis for understanding electrochemical measurements in similar microscale systems and for studying gas-generating reactions with liquid electrochemical TEM.

Keywords

carbon microelectrodeseCO2Relectrocatalysisin situ TEMORR
Type
Software and Instrumentation
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 25 , Issue 6 , December 2019 , pp. 1304 - 1310
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bard, AJ & Faulkner, LR (2001). Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Beermann, V, Holtz, ME, Padgett, E, de Araujo, JF, Muller, DA & Strasser, P (2019). Real-time imaging of activation and degradation of carbon supported octahedral Pt–Ni alloy fuel cell catalysts at the nanoscale using in situ electrochemical liquid cell STEM. Energy Environ Sci. doi:10.1039/c9ee01185d.Google Scholar
Benck, JD, Pinaud, BA, Gorlin, Y & Jaramillo, TF (2014). Substrate selection for fundamental studies of electrocatalysts and photoelectrodes: Inert potential windows in acidic, neutral, and basic electrolyte. PLoS One 9, e107942.Google Scholar
Beriet, C & Pletcher, D (1993). A microelectrode study of the mechanism and kinetics of the ferro/ferricyanide couple in aqueous media: The influence of the electrolyte and its concentration. J Electroanal Chem 361, 93–101.Google Scholar
Borup, R, Meyers, J, Pivovar, B, Kim, YS, Mukundan, R, Garland, N, Myers, D, Wilson, M, Garzon, F, Wood, D, Zelenay, P, More, K, Stroh, K, Zawodzinski, T, Boncella, J, McGrath, JE, Inaba, M, Miyatake, K, Hori, M, Ota, K, Ogumi, Z, Miyata, S, Nishikata, A, Siroma, Z, Uchimoto, Y, Yasuda, K, Kimijima, K & Iwashita, N (2007). Scientific aspects of polymer electrolyte fuel cell durability and degradation. Chem Rev 107, 3904–3951.Google Scholar
Brownson, DAC, Kelly, PJ & Banks, CE (2015). In situ electrochemical characterisation of graphene and various carbon-based electrode materials: An internal standard approach. RSC Adv 5, 37281–37286.Google Scholar
Chen, X, Noh, KW, Wen, JG & Dillon, SJ (2012). In situ electrochemical wet cell transmission electron microscopy characterization of solid–liquid interactions between Ni and aqueous NiCl2. Acta Mater 60, 192–198.Google Scholar
Ching, S, Dudek, R & Tabet, E (1994). Cyclic voltammetry with ultramicroelectrodes. J Chem Educ 71, 602.Google Scholar
Compton, RG, Fisher, AC, Wellington, RG, Dobson, PJ & Leigh, PA (1993). Hydrodynamic voltammetry with microelectrodes: Channel microband electrodes; theory and experiment. J Phys Chem 97, 10410–10415.Google Scholar
Cooper, JA & Compton, RG (1998). Channel electrodes — A review. Electroanalysis 10, 141–155.Google Scholar
Crozier, PA & Hansen, TW (2015). In situ and operando transmission electron microscopy of catalytic materials. MRS Bull 40, 38–45.Google Scholar
Daubinger, P, Kieninger, J, Unmüssig, T & Urban, GA (2014). Electrochemical characteristics of nanostructured platinum electrodes – A cyclic voltammetry study. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16, 8392–8399.Google Scholar
Elbicki, JM, Morgan, DM & Weber, SG (1984). Theoretical and practical limitations on the optimization of amperometric detectors. Anal Chem 56, 978–985.Google Scholar
Elgrishi, N, Rountree, KJ, McCarthy, BD, Rountree, ES, Eisenhart, TT & Dempsey, JL (2018). A practical beginner's guide to cyclic voltammetry. J Chem Educ 95, 197–206.Google Scholar
Engstrom, RC (1982). Electrochemical pretreatment of glassy carbon electrodes. Anal Chem 54, 2310–2314.Google Scholar
Figueres, C, Schellnhuber, HJ, Whiteman, G, Rockström, J, Hobley, A & Rahmstorf, S (2017). Three years to safeguard our climate. Nature News 546, 593.Google Scholar
Gasteiger, HA, Kocha, SS, Sompalli, B & Wagner, FT (2005). Activity benchmarks and requirements for Pt, Pt-alloy, and non-Pt oxygen reduction catalysts for PEMFCs. Appl Catal B: Environ 56, 9–35.Google Scholar
Goldberg, IB, Bard, AJ & Feldberg, SW (1972). Resistive effects in thin electrochemical cells. Digital simulations of electrochemistry in electron spin resonance cells. J Phys Chem 76, 2550–2559.Google Scholar
Greeley, J, Stephens, IEL, Bondarenko, AS, Johansson, TP, Hansen, HA, Jaramillo, TF, Rossmeisl, J, Chorkendorff, I & Nørskov, JK (2009). Alloys of platinum and early transition metals as oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. Nat Chem 1, 552–556.Google Scholar
Guétaz, L, Lopez-Haro, M, Bayle-Guillemaud, P, Morin, A & Escribano, S (2016). Contribution of transmission electron microscopy to proton exchange membrane fuel cell electrodes development and degradation understanding. Microsc Microanal 22, 1282–1283.Google Scholar
Han, B, Stoerzinger, KA, Tileli, V, Gamalski, AD, Stach, EA & Shao-Horn, Y (2017). Nanoscale structural oscillations in perovskite oxides induced by oxygen evolution. Nat Mater 16, 121–126.Google Scholar
Hendel, SJ & Young, ER (2016). Introduction to electrochemistry and the use of electrochemistry to synthesize and evaluate catalysts for water oxidation and reduction. J Chem Educ 93, 1951–1956.Google Scholar
Hertz, HS & Chesler, SN (1979). Trace organic analysis: A new frontier in analytical chemistry. Proceedings of the 9th Materials Research Symposium Held at the National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, Maryland, April 10–13, 1978. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards.Google Scholar
Hodnik, N, Dehm, G & Mayrhofer, KJJ (2016). Importance and challenges of electrochemical in situ liquid cell electron microscopy for energy conversion research. Acc Chem Res 49, 2015–2022.Google Scholar
Holtz, ME, Yu, Y, Gunceler, D, Gao, J, Sundararaman, R, Schwarz, KA, Arias, TA, Abruña, HD & Muller, DA (2014). Nanoscale imaging of lithium ion distribution during in situ operation of battery electrode and electrolyte. Nano Lett 14, 1453–1459.Google Scholar
Hou, C, Han, J, Liu, P, Yang, C, Huang, G, Fujita, T, Hirata, A & Chen, M (2018). Operando observations of RuO2 catalyzed Li2O2 formation and decomposition in a Li-O2 micro-battery. Nano Energy 47, 427–433.Google Scholar
Huang, J, Hörmann, N, Oveisi, E, Loiudice, A, De Gregorio, GL, Andreussi, O, Marzari, N & Buonsanti, R (2018). Potential-induced nanoclustering of metallic catalysts during electrochemical CO2 reduction. Nat Commun 9, 3117.Google Scholar
IPCC (2018). Summary for policymakers. In Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner H-O, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR, Pirani A, Moufouma-Okia W, Péan C, Pidcock R, Connors S, Matthews JBR, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gomis MI, Lonnoy E, Maycock T, Tignor M & Waterfield T (Eds.). Available at http://www.ipcc.ch/report/sr15/ (accessed February 22, 2019).Google Scholar
Karki, K, Mefford, T, Alsem, DH, Salmon, N & Chueh, WC (2018). Replicating bulk electrochemistry in liquid cell microscopy. Microsc Microanal 24, 324–325.Google Scholar
Kishita, K, Sakai, H, Tanaka, H, Saka, H, Kuroda, K, Sakamoto, M, Watabe, A & Kamino, T (2009). Development of an analytical environmental TEM system and its application. J Electron Microsc 58, 331–339.Google Scholar
Kortlever, R, Peters, I, Koper, S & Koper, MTM (2015). Electrochemical CO2 reduction to formic acid at low overpotential and with high Faradaic efficiency on carbon-supported bimetallic Pd–Pt nanoparticles. ACS Catal 5, 3916–3923.Google Scholar
Kuhl, KP, Cave, ER, Abram, DN & Jaramillo, TF (2012). New insights into the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on metallic copper surfaces. Energy Environ Sci 5, 7050–7059.Google Scholar
Loiudice, A, Lobaccaro, P, Kamali, EA, Thao, T, Huang, BH, Ager, JW & Buonsanti, R (2016). Tailoring copper nanocrystals towards C2 products in electrochemical CO2 reduction. Angew Chem Int Ed 55, 5789–5792.Google Scholar
Luo, L, Engelhard, MH, Shao, Y & Wang, C (2017). Revealing the dynamics of platinum nanoparticle catalysts on carbon in oxygen and water using environmental TEM. ACS Catal 7, 7658–7664.Google Scholar
Mildner, S, Beleggia, M, Mierwaldt, D, Hansen, TW, Wagner, JB, Yazdi, S, Kasama, T, Ciston, J, Zhu, Y & Jooss, C (2015). Environmental TEM study of electron beam induced electrochemistry of Pr0.64Ca0.36MnO3 catalysts for oxygen evolution. J Phys Chem C 119, 5301–5310.Google Scholar
Miller, BK & Crozier, PA (2014). Analysis of catalytic gas products using electron energy-loss spectroscopy and residual gas analysis for operando transmission electron microscopy. Microsc Microanal 20, 815–824.Google Scholar
Peña, NO, Ihiawakrim, D, Portehault, D, Laberty-Robert, C, Carenco, S, Sanchez, C & Ersen, O (2019). Studying electrocatalyts in operando conditions: Correlating TEM imaging and X-ray spectroscopies. Microsc Microanal 25, 37–38.Google Scholar
Schilling, S, Janssen, A, Zaluzec, NJ & Burke, MG (2017). Practical aspects of electrochemical corrosion measurements during in situ analytical transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of austenitic stainless steel in aqueous media. Microsc Microanal 23, 741–750.Google Scholar
Seh, ZW, Kibsgaard, J, Dickens, CF, Chorkendorff, I, Nørskov, JK & Jaramillo, TF (2017). Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: Insights into materials design. Science 355, eaad4998.Google Scholar
Shinwari, MW, Zhitomirsky, D, Deen, IA, Selvaganapathy, PR, Deen, MJ & Landheer, D (2010). Microfabricated reference electrodes and their biosensing applications. Sensors 10, 1679–1715.Google Scholar
Song, Z & Xie, Z-H (2018). A literature review of in situ transmission electron microscopy technique in corrosion studies. Micron 112, 69–83.Google Scholar
Spöri, C, Kwan, JTH, Bonakdarpour, A, Wilkinson, DP & Strasser, P (2017). The stability challenges of oxygen evolving catalysts: Towards a common fundamental understanding and mitigation of catalyst degradation. Angew Chem Int Ed 56, 5994–6021.Google Scholar
Stamenkovic, VR, Strmcnik, D, Lopes, PP & Markovic, NM (2017). Energy and fuels from electrochemical interfaces. Nat Mater 16, 57–69.Google Scholar
Stricker, EA, Ke, X, Wainright, JS, Unocic, RR & Savinell, RF (2019). Current density distribution in electrochemical cells with small cell heights and coplanar thin electrodes as used in ec-S/TEM cell geometries. J Electrochem Soc 166, H126–H134.Google Scholar
Su, DS, Zhang, B & Schlögl, R (2015). Electron microscopy of solid catalysts—transforming from a challenge to a toolbox. Chem Rev 115, 2818–2882.Google Scholar
Toyota (2015). JFCC breakthrough in real-time observation of fuel cell catalyst degradation. Fuel Cells Bull 2015, 14–15.Google Scholar
Unocic, RR, Sacci, RL, Brown, GM, Veith, GM, Dudney, NJ, More, KL, Walden, FS, Gardiner, DS, Damiano, J & Nackashi, DP (2014 a). Quantitative electrochemical measurements using in situ ec-S/TEM devices. Microsc Microanal 20, 452–461.Google Scholar
Unocic, RR, Sun, X-G, Sacci, RL, Adamczyk, LA, Hein Alsem, D, Dai, S, Dudney, NJ & More, KL (2014 b). Direct visualization of solid electrolyte interphase formation in lithium-ion batteries with in situ electrochemical transmission electron microscopy. Microsc Microanal 20, 1029–1037.Google Scholar
Wightman, RM (1988). Voltammetry with microscopic electrodes in new domains. Science 240, 415–420.Google Scholar
Wightman, RM, Deakin, MR, Kovach, PM, Kuhr, WG & Stutts, KJ (1984). Methods to improve electrochemical reversibility at carbon electrodes. J Electrochem Soc 131, 1578–1583.Google Scholar
Williamson, MJ, Tromp, RM, Vereecken, PM, Hull, R & Ross, FM (2003). Dynamic microscopy of nanoscale cluster growth at the solid–liquid interface. Nat Mater 2, 532–536.Google Scholar
Yoshida, K, Bright, AN, Ward, MR, Lari, L, Zhang, X, Hiroyama, T, Boyes, ED & Gai, PL (2014). Dynamic wet-ETEM observation of Pt/C electrode catalysts in a moisturized cathode atmosphere. Nanotechnology 25, 425702.Google Scholar
Yuan, Y, Amine, K, Lu, J & Shahbazian-Yassar, R (2017). Understanding materials challenges for rechargeable ion batteries with in situ transmission electron microscopy. Nat Commun 8, 15806.Google Scholar
Zhu, G-Z, Prabhudev, S, Yang, J, Gabardo, CM, Botton, GA & Soleymani, L (2014). In situ liquid cell TEM study of morphological evolution and degradation of Pt–Fe nanocatalysts during potential cycling. J Phys Chem C 118, 22111–22119.Google Scholar
Zittel, HE & Miller, FJ (1965). A glassy-carbon electrode for voltammetry. Analyt Chem 37, 200–203.Google Scholar