Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:04:40.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Critical Consideration of Precipitate Analysis of Fe–1 at.% Cu Using Atom Probe and Small-Angle Neutron Scattering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2010

M. Schober*
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Metallurgy and Materials Testing, University of Leoben, Franz-Josef-Straße 18, 8700 Leoben, Austria
E. Eidenberger
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Metallurgy and Materials Testing, University of Leoben, Franz-Josef-Straße 18, 8700 Leoben, Austria
P. Staron
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials Research, GKSS Research Centre, Max Planck-Str. 1, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany
H. Leitner
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Metallurgy and Materials Testing, University of Leoben, Franz-Josef-Straße 18, 8700 Leoben, Austria
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

An Fe–1 at.% Cu model alloy was examined by atom probe (3DAP) and small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) to verify the accordance of the gained results. The Fe-Cu alloy was heat-treated for various times at 500°C, forming Cu-rich precipitates within the Fe matrix. The chemical compositions of the precipitates and matrix found by 3DAP were used to calculate the magnetic scattering contrast. Additionally, a magnetic moment of the precipitates that contain a significant amount of Fe was taken into account for the calculation of magnetic scattering contrast. This in turn is used for the evaluation of the magnetic scattering curves gained by SANS. Both the 3DAP data as well as the scattering curves were analyzed with regard to radius, number density, and volume fraction of the precipitates as a function of aging time. The results yielded by both techniques are in good agreement and correspond to the development of the hardness of the alloy. Minor differences can be related to the cluster search algorithm used for the analysis of the 3DAP data as well as Fe overestimation based on different field phases.

Type
Atom Probe Applications
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bacon, G.E. (1975). Neutron Diffraction. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cerezo, A. & Davin, L. (2007). Aspects of the observation of clusters in the 3-dimensional atom probe. Surf Interf Anal 39(2-3), 184188.Google Scholar
Charleux, M., Livet, F., Bley, F., Louchet, F. & Bréchet, Y. (1996). Thermal ageing of an Fe-Cu alloy: Microstructural evolution and precipitation hardening. Phil Mag A 73(4), 883897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahmen, U., Ferguson, P. & Westmacott, K.H. (1984). Invariant line strain and needle-precipitate growth directions in Fe-Cu. Acta Metallurg 32(5), 803810.Google Scholar
Deschamps, A., Militzer, M. & Poole, W.J. (2001). Precipitation kinetics and strengthening of a Fe-0.8wt%Cu alloy. ISIJ Int 41(2), 196205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, S.R., Brenner, S.S. & Low, J.R. (1973a). An FIM-atom probe study of the precipitation of copper from lron-1.4 at. pct copper. Part I: Field-ion microscopy. Metallurg Trans 4(10), 23632369.Google Scholar
Goodman, S.R., Brenner, S.S. & Low, J.R. (1973b). An FIM-atom probe study of the precipitation of copper from iron-1.4 at. pct copper. Part II: Atom probe analyses. Metallurg Trans 4(10), 23712378.Google Scholar
Haasen, P. (1978). Physical Metallurgy, Mordike, J. (translator). Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hellman, O.C., Vandenbroucke, J.A., Rüsing, J., Isheim, D. & Seidman, D.N. (2000). Analysis of three-dimensional atom-probe data by the proximity histogram. Microsc Microanal 6(5), 437444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hornbogen, E. (1962). The role of strain energy during precipitation of copper and gold from alpha iron. Acta Metallurg 10(5), 525533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornbogen, E. & Glenn, R.C. (1960). A metallographic study of precipitation of copper from alpha iron. Trans Metallurg Soc AIME 218, 10641070.Google Scholar
Isheim, D., Gagliano, M.S., Fine, M.E. & Seidman, D.N. (2006). Interfacial segregation at Cu-rich precipitates in a high-strength low-carbon steel studied on a sub-nanometer scale. Acta Mater 54(3), 841849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isheim, D. & Seidman, D.N. (2004). Nanoscale studies of segregation at coherent heterophase interfaces in alpha-Fe based systems. Surf Interf Anal 36(5-6), 569574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostorz, G. (1979). In treatise on materials science and technology. Neutron Scattering, Kostorz, G. (Ed.), 15, pp. 226228. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lahiri, S.K., Chandra, D., Schwartz, L.H. & Fine, M.E. (1969). Modulus and Moessbauer studies of precipitation in Fe-1.67 at.% Cu. Met Soc AIME-Trans 245(9), 18651868.Google Scholar
Leitner, H., Clemens, H., Akre, J., Danoix, F. & Staron, P. (2007). On the evolution of secondary hardening carbides in a high-speed steel characterised by APFIM and SANS. Int J Mater Res 98(11), 10931103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, H., Stiller, K., Andren, H.O. & Danoix, F. (2004). Conventional and tomographic atom probe investigations of secondary-hardening carbides. Surf Interf Anal 36(5-6), 540545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J.Z., Van De Walle, A., Ghosh, G. & Asta, M. (2005). Structure, energetics, and mechanical stability of Fe-Cu bcc alloys from first-principles calculations. Phys Rev B 72(14), 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maruyama, N., Sugiyama, M., Hara, T. & Tamehiro, H. (1999). Precipitation and phase transformation of copper particles in low alloy ferritic and martensitic steels. Mater Trans JIM 40(4), 268277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathon, M.H., Barbu, A., Dunstetter, F., Maury, F., Lorenzelli, N. & De Novion, C.H. (1997). Experimental study and modelling of copper precipitation under electron irradiation in dilute FeCu binary alloys. J Nucl Mater 245(2-3), 224237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M.K. (1996). Atom Probe Field Ion Microscopy. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M.K., Pareige, P. & Burke, M.G. (2000). Understanding pressure vessel steels: An atom probe perspective. Mater Charac 44(1-2), 235254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M.K., Wirth, B.D. & Odette, G.R. (2003). Precipitation in neutron-irradiated Fe-Cu and Fe-Cu-Mn model alloys: A comparison of APT and SANS data. Mater Sci Eng A 353(1-2), 133139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, A., Sha, G., Hirosawa, S., Cerezo, A. & Smith, G.D.W. (2009). Determining the composition of small features in atom probe: bcc Cu-rich precipitates in an Fe-rich matrix. Ultramicroscopy 109(5), 535540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osamura, K., Okuda, H., Takashima, M., Asano, K. & Furusaka, M. (1993). Small-angle neutron scattering study of phase decomposition in Fe-Cu binary alloy. Mater Trans JIM 34(4), 305311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Othen, P.J., Jenkins, M.L., Smith, G.D.W. & Phythian, W.J. (1991). Transmission electron microscope investigations of the structure of copper precipitates in thermally-aged Fe-Cu and Fe-Cu-Ni. Phil Mag Lett 64(6), 383391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pareige, P., Auger, P., Bas, P. & Blavette, D. (1995). Direct observation of copper precipitation in a neutron irradiated FeCu alloy by 3D atomic tomography. Scripta Metall Mater 33(7), 10331036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pareige, P. & Miller, M.K. (1996). Characterization of neutron-induced copper-enriched clusters in pressure vessel steel weld: An APFIM study. Appl Surf Sci 94-95, 370377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pareige, P.J., Russell, K.F. & Miller, M.K. (1996). APFIM studies of the phase transformations in thermally aged ferritic FeCuNi alloys: Comparison with aging under neutron irradiation. Appl Surf Sci 94-95, 362369.Google Scholar
Pareige, P., Russell, K.F., Stoller, R.E. & Miller, M.K. (1997a). Influence of long-term thermal aging on the microstructural evolution of nuclear reactor pressure vessel materials: An atom probe study. J Nucl Mater 250(2-3), 176183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pareige, P., Stoller, R.E., Russell, K.F. & Miller, M.K. (1997b). Atom probe characterization of the microstructure of nuclear pressure vessel surveillance materials after neutron irradiation and after annealing treatments. J Nucl Mater 249(2-3), 165174.Google Scholar
Prakash Kolli, R. & Seidman, D.N. (2008). The temporal evolution of the decomposition of a concentrated multicomponent Fe-Cu-based steel. Acta Mater 56(9), 20732088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schober, M., Eidenberger, E., Leitner, H., Staron, P., Reith, D. & Podloucky, R. (2010). A critical consideration of magnetism and composition of (bcc) Cu precipitates in (bcc) Fe. Appl Phys A 99, 697704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C.S. & Palmer, E.W. (1933). Precipitation hardening of copper steels. Trans AIME 105, 133168.Google Scholar
Vaumousse, D., Cerezo, A. & Warren, P.J. (2003). A procedure for quantification of precipitate microstructures from three-dimensional atom probe data. Ultramicroscopy 95, 215221.Google Scholar
Worrall, G.M., Buswell, J.T., English, C.A., Hetherington, M.G. & Smith, G.D.W. (1987). A study of the precipitation of copper particles in a ferrite matrix. J Nucl Mater 148(1), 107114.Google Scholar
Zhang, W. & Ma, E. (2000). Magnetic moment and atomic volume in supersaturated Fe-Cu solid solutions: Ab initio calculations compared with experiments. J Mater Res 15(3), 653658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar