Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:40:58.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contributions of Microscopy to the Diagnosis and Investigation of Aids-Associated Renal Disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

D. N. Howell
Affiliation:
Departments of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC27710, and, V. A. Medical Center, Durham, NC27705
L. A. Szczech
Affiliation:
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC27710
Get access

Extract

Microscopy has had a major role in the analysis of renal disorders associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, both as a diagnostic method and as a means of studying pathogenic mechanisms. In the diagnostic realm, microscopic analysis of renal tissue obtained at biopsy and autopsy is a mainstay for the detection of a wide range of glomerular, vascular, and tubulointerstitial diseases. As an investigative tool, microscopy has made an important, albeit somewhat controversial, contribution to our understanding of the pathogenesis of at least one HIV-associated renal lesion.

A variety of ultrastructural alterations have been documented in association with HIV infection. These include tubuloreticular inclusions (most commonly seen in vascular endothelial cells and mononuclear leukocytes)(Fig. la), cylindrical confronting cisternae (typically found in mononuclear leukocytes) (Fig. lb), and nuclear abnormalities such as nuclear bodies and granular change (most often in tubulointerstitial cells) (Fig. lc).

Type
Pathology of Aids and Related Conditions
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Cohen, A. H., Nast, C. C., in Heptinstall's Pathology of the Kidney. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven Publishers (1998)785.Google Scholar
2.Alpers, C. E. et al. Am J Kidney Dis 12(1988)240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Hsieh, W.-S. et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant 11(1996)2320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Bass, P. S. etal. J Clin Pathol 47(1994)179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Smith, M. C. et al. Am J Med 101(1996)41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Kimmel, P. L. et al. Am J Kidney Dis 28(1996)202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Cohen, A. H. et al. Mod Pathol 2(1989)125.Google Scholar
8.Kimmel, P. L. et al. N Engl J Med 327(1992)702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar