Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T14:28:28.681Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Closed-Cell Foam Skin Thickness Measurement Using a Scanning Electron Microscope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2011

Clifford S. Todd*
Affiliation:
The Dow Chemical Company, Analytical Sciences, Midland, MI 48667, USA
Valentina Kuznetsova
Affiliation:
The Dow Chemical Company, Dow Building Solutions. Midland, MI 48674, USA
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Closed cell polymer foam skin thickness can be assessed by taking backscatter electron (BSE) images in a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at a series of accelerating voltages. Under a given set of experimental conditions, the electron beam mostly passes through thin polymer skin cell walls. That cell appears dark compared to adjacent thicker-skinned cells. Higher accelerating voltages lead to a thicker skin being penetrated. Monte Carlo modeling of beam-sample interactions indicates that at 5 keV, skin less than ∼0.5 μm in thickness will appear dark, whereas imaging at 30 keV allows skin thicknesses up to ∼4 μm to be identified. The distribution of skin thickness can be assessed over square millimeters of foam surface in this manner. Qualitative comparisons of the skin thicknesses of samples can be made with a simple visual inspection of the images. A semiquantitative comparison is possible by applying image analysis. The proposed method is applied to two example foams. Characterizing foam skin thickness by this method is possible using any SEM that is capable of collecting useful BSE images over a range of accelerating voltages. Imaging in low vacuum, where an electrically conductive metal coating is not required, leads to more sensitivity in skin thickness characterization.

Type
Materials Applications
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bush, S.F. & Ademosu, O.K. (2004). Low-density rotomoulded polymer foams. Col Surf A 263, 370378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drouin, D., Couture, A.R., Joly, D., Tastet, X., Aimez, V. & Gauvin, R. (2007). CASINO V2.42—A fast and easy-to-use modeling tool for scanning electron microscopy and microanalysis users. Scanning 29, 92101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, J.I., Newbury, D.E., Echlin, P., Joy, D.C., Romig, A.D. Jr., Lyman, C.E., Fiori, C. & Lifshin, E. (1992). Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis, 2nd ed.New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosselin, R. & Rodrigue, D. (2005). Cell morphology analysis of high density polymer foams. Polymer Test 24, 10271035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morisaki, M., Ito, T., Hayvali, M., Tabata, I., Hisada, K. & Hori, T. (2008). Preparation of skinless polymer foam with supercritical carbon dioxide and its application to a photoinduced hydrogen evolution system. Polymer 49, 16111619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasband, W.S. (1997). ImageJ. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health. Available at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/.Google Scholar
Sandberg, P.I. (1990). Deterioration of thermal insulation properties of extruded polystyrene: Classification and quality control system in Sweden. Insulating Materials, Testing, and Applications. ASTM STP 1030. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.Google Scholar
Zhou, J., Song, J. & Parker, R. (2006). Structure and properties of starch-based foams prepared by microwave heating from extruded pellets. Carbohyd Polym 63, 466475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar