Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:44:05.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Applying Dynamic Experiments and Stereo Measurements to Evaluation of Dentin Specimen Preparation Techniques for Environmental and Conventional SEM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

V.M. Dusevich
Affiliation:
Department of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, University of Missouri- Kansas City, MO64108, USA
J.D. Eick
Affiliation:
Department of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, University of Missouri- Kansas City, MO64108, USA
Get access

Extract

The acid etching process is the primary stage for preparation of dental composite restorations. Dentin specimens from extracted teeth are usually prepared by fracturing etched pieces of dentin. Etching creates a demineralized layer on the dentin surface with the thickness of a few microns. The layer consists of wet collagen and dissolved proteins; its drying process is of special interest in dentistry since it affects the bonding of the resin adhesives to dentin. Observations of fractured surfaces can be performed in either a conventional or an environmental SEM.

Three wet dentin samples were observed (XL30 FEG ESEM, FEI/Philips) in wet mode at 5°C Peltier cooling stage temperature and 5.8 MPa water vapor pressure. Samples with excess water on their top surface were put in an ESEM. Thickness measurements of the demineralized zone were begun immediately after the evaporation of this water layer with subsequent measurements taken after 5, 10, 20, 40, 60 and 100 minutes of drying.

Type
Working with ESEM and Other Variable Pressure Systems
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.Eick, J.D. et al., Rev. Oral. Biol. Med., (1997) 8(3):306335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Gwinnett, A.J.American J. of Dentistry, (1994) V.7, No. 5: 243246Google Scholar
3.Spencer, P. et al., J Dental Research, Abstract No. 955, (IADR Meeting), (1999)78:225Google Scholar
4.Lane, G.S. in The use of the scanning electron microscope. Oxford: Pergamon Press (1972) 219238Google Scholar
5.Carvalho, R.M. et al., Arc. Oral Biol. (1996)41:379386CrossRefGoogle Scholar