Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:56:30.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analyzing Mg and Fe in Olivines, Pyroxenes, and Garnets: Systematic Discrepancies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

P. Carpenter
Affiliation:
Analytical Facility, Division of Earth and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125
J. Armstrong
Affiliation:
Surface and Microanalysis Science Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899
Get access

Extract

Quantitative analysis of Mg and Fe in olivines, pyroxenes, and garnets is important for geochemical studies. Natural olivines have compositions close to the forsterite (Mg2SiO4) and fayalite (Fe2SiO4) binary system, with relatively minor substitution of other components. Pyroxenes and garnets are problematic in that they exhibit more diverse solid solution, and may contain both Fe2+ and Fe3+, the relative concentrations of which cannot be directly measured with the microprobe. The forsterite-fayalite olivine binary is a convenient system for studying the accuracy of Mg and Fe analysis without other complicating factors.

Bence and Albee utilized the a-factor approach for quantitative analysis of silicates, based on the empirical observation:

where CA,AB is the weight fraction of the oxide A in a binary oxide system AB, and KA,AB is the measured x-ray intensity of A relative to that of the pure oxide A.

Type
Problem Elements and Spectrometry Problems in X-Ray Microanalysis
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bence, A.E. and Albee, A.L., J. Geol. (1968) 76, 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Armstrong, J.T., Microbeam Analysis (1988), 469.Google Scholar
3.Henke, B.L. and Ebisu, E.S., Advances in X-ray Analysis, 17, 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Heinrich, K.F.J., The Electron Microprobe, 296.Google Scholar