Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:39:29.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Al2O3 Grain Boundary Segregation in a Thermal Barrier Coating on a Ni-Based Superalloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2022

Yimeng Chen*
Affiliation:
CAMECA Instruments, Inc., Madison, WI 53711, USA
Katherine P. Rice
Affiliation:
CAMECA Instruments, Inc., Madison, WI 53711, USA
Ty J. Prosa
Affiliation:
CAMECA Instruments, Inc., Madison, WI 53711, USA
Roger C. Reed
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PH, UK
Emmanuelle A. Marquis
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Yimeng Chen, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The segregation of reactive elements (REs) along thermally grown oxide (TGO) grain boundaries has been associated to slower oxide growth kinetics and improved creep properties. However, the incorporation and diffusion of these elements into the TGO during oxidation of Ni alloys remains an open question. In this work, electron backscatter diffraction in transmission mode (t-EBSD) was used to investigate the microstructure of TGO within the thermal barrier coating on a Ni-based superalloy, and atom probe tomography (APT) was used to quantify the segregation behavior of REs to α-Al2O3 grain boundaries. Integrating the two techniques enables a higher level of site-specific analysis compared to the routine focused ion beam lift-out sample preparation method without t-EBSD. Needle-shaped APT specimens readily meet the thickness criterion for electron diffraction analysis. Transmission EBSD provides an immediate feedback on grain orientation and grain boundary location within the APT specimens to help target grain boundaries in the TGO. Segregation behavior of REs is discussed in terms of the grain boundary character and relative location in TGO.

Type
Materials Science Applications
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babinsky, K, De Kloe, R, Clemens, H & Primig, S (2014). A novel approach for site-specific atom probe specimen preparation by focused ion beam and transmission electron backscatter diffraction. Ultramicroscopy 144, 918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bachhav, M, Chen, Y, Marquis, E & Geiser, B (2013). Measuring chemical segregation at grain boundaries by atom probe tomography. Microsc Microanal 19, 940941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y, Reed, RC & Marquis, EA (2012). As-coated thermal barrier coating: Structure and chemistry. Scr Mater 67, 779782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y, Reed, RC & Marquis, EA (2014). Interfacial solute segregation in the thermally grown oxide of thermal barrier coating structures. Oxid Met 82, 457467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y, Rice, KP, Prosa, TJ, Marquis, EA & Reed, RC (2015). Integrated APT/t-EBSD for grain boundary analysis of thermally grown oxide on a Ni-based superalloy. Microsc Microanal 21, 687688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y, Rice, KP, Prosa, TJ, Nowell, MM & Wright, SI (2016). Correlative t-EBSD tomography and atom probe tomography analysis. Microsc Microanal 22, 682683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, LA (1968). Limits for qualitative detection and quantitative determination. Application to radiochemistry. Anal Chem 40, 586593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danoix, F, Grancher, G, Bostel, A & Blavette, D (2007). Standard deviations of composition measurements in atom probe analyses—part II: 3D atom probe. Ultramicroscopy 107, 739743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doleker, KM, Ozgurluk, Y & Karaoglanli, AC (2021). TGO growth and kinetic study of single and double layered TBC systems. Surf Coat Technol 415, 127135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, AG, Mumm, DR, Hutchinson, JW, Meier, GH & Pettit, FS (2001). Mechanisms controlling the durability of thermal barrier coatings. Prog Mater Sci 46, 505553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gell, M, Vaidyanathan, K, Barber, B, Jordan, E & Cheng, J (1999). Mechanism of spallation in platinum aluminide/electron beam physical vapor-deposited thermal barrier coatings. Metallurg Mater Trans A 30, 427435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannuzzi, LA & Stevie, FA (1999). A review of focused ion beam milling techniques for TEM specimen preparation. Micron 30, 197204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gülgün, MA, Voytovych, R, Maclaren, I, Rühle, M & Cannon, RM (2002). Cation segregation in an oxide ceramic with low solubility: Yttrium doped α-alumina. Interface Sci 10, 99110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, JA, Ferber, MK, Porter, WD & Rigney, ED (1999). Characterization of alumina scales formed during isothermal and cyclic oxidation of plasma-sprayed TBC systems at 1150 C. Oxid Met 52, 3176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellman, OC & Seidman, DN (2002). Measurement of the Gibbsian interfacial excess of solute at an interface of arbitrary geometry using three-dimensional atom probe microscopy. Mater Sci Eng A 327, 2428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heuer, AH (2008). Oxygen and aluminum diffusion in α-Al2O3: How much do we really understand? J Eur Ceram Soc 28, 14951507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heuer, AH, Hovis, DB, Smialek, JL & Gleeson, B (2011). Alumina scale formation: A new perspective. J Am Ceram Soc 94, s146s153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heuer, AH, Nakagawa, T, Azar, MZ, Hovis, DB, Smialek, JL, Gleeson, B, Hine, NDM, Guhl, H, Lee, H-S & Tangney, P (2013). On the growth of Al2O3 scales. Acta Mater 61, 66706683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, EA & Carter, EA (2002). The role of reactive elements in thermal barrier coatings. Comput Sci Eng 4, 3341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayalakshmi, V & Subramanian, KRV (2021). Thermal barrier coatings: State-of-art developments and challenges—a mini review. Trans IMF 14.Google Scholar
Johnson, CA, Ruud, JA, Bruce, R & Wortman, D (1998). Relationships between residual stress, microstructure and mechanical properties of electron beam–physical vapor deposition thermal barrier coatings. Surf Coat Technol 108, 8085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, TF & Miller, MK (2007). Atom probe tomography. Rev Sci Instrum 78, 031101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, AN & Lu, J (2003). Behavior of air plasma sprayed thermal barrier coatings, subject to intense thermal cycling. Surf Coat Technol 166, 3743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Q, Hu, X, Zhu, W, Guo, J & Tan, Z (2021). Effects of Ta2O5 content on mechanical properties and high-temperature performance of Zr6Ta2O17 thermal barrier coatings. J Am Ceram Soc 104, 65336544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquis, EA, Bachhav, M, Chen, Y, Dong, Y, Gordon, LM & McFarland, A (2013). On the current role of atom probe tomography in materials characterization and materials science. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 17, 217223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquis, EA, Hu, R & Rousseau, T (2011). A systematic approach for the study of radiation-induced segregation/depletion at grain boundaries in steels. J Nucl Mater 413, 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mateescu, N, Ferry, M, Xu, W & Cairney, JM (2007). Some factors affecting EBSD pattern quality of Ga+ ion-milled face centred cubic metal surfaces. Mater Chem Phys 106, 142148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, MK & Kenik, EA (2004). Atom probe tomography: A technique for nanoscale characterization. Microsc Microanal 10, 336341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, MK, Russell, KF, Thompson, K, Alvis, R & Larson, DJ (2007). Review of atom probe FIB-based specimen preparation methods. Microsc Microanal 13, 428436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, RA (1987). Current status of thermal barrier coatings—an overview. Surf Coat Technol 30, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, DP (1989). Role of reactive elements in alloy protection. Mater Sci Technol 5, 754764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padture, NP, Gell, M & Jordan, EH (2002). Thermal barrier coatings for gas-turbine engine applications. Science 296, 280284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pint, BA (1996). Experimental observations in support of the dynamic-segregation theory to explain the reactive-element effect. Oxid Met 45, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pint, BA & Alexander, KB (1998). Grain boundary segregation of cation dopants in α-Al2O3 scales. J Electrochem Soc 145, 1819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pint, BA & More, KL (2009). Characterization of alumina interfaces in TBC systems. J Mater Sci 44, 16761686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pint, BA & Unocic, KA (2012). Ionic segregation on grain boundaries in thermally grown alumina scales. Mater High Temp 29, 257263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pint, BA, Wright, IG, Lee, WY, Zhang, Y, Pruessner, K & Alexander, KB (1998). Substrate and bond coat compositions: Factors affecting alumina scale adhesion. Mater Sci Eng A 245, 201211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portinha, A, Teixeira, V, Carneiro, J, Martins, J, Costa, MF, Vassen, R & Stoever, D (2005). Characterization of thermal barrier coatings with a gradient in porosity. Surf Coat Technol 195, 245251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povstugar, I, Weber, J, Naumenko, D, Huang, T, Klinkenberg, M & Quadakkers, WJ (2019). Correlative atom probe tomography and transmission electron microscopy analysis of grain boundaries in thermally grown alumina scale. Microsc Microanal 25, 1120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, RC (2006). The Superalloys: Fundamentals and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigney, DV, Viguie, R, Wortman, DJ & Skelly, DW (1997). PVD thermal barrier coating applications and process development for aircraft engines. J Therm Spray Technol 6, 167175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, AJ, Kumar, M, Adams, BL & Field, DP (2009 [2014]). Electron Backscatter Diffraction in Materials Science. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-88136-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shillington, EAG & Clarke, DR (1999). Spalling failure of a thermal barrier coating associated with aluminum depletion in the bond-coat. Acta Mater 47, 12971305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillassen, M, Eklund, P, Pryds, N & Bøttiger, J (2010). Effects of dopant concentration and impurities on the conductivity of magnetron-sputtered nanocrystalline yttria-stabilized zirconia. Solid State Ionics 181, 864867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smialek, JL (1991). Effect of sulfur removal on Al2O3 scale adhesion. Metallurg Trans A 22, 739752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiger, MJ, Yanar, NM, Jackson, RW, Laney, SJ, Pettit, FS, Meier, GH, Gandhi, AS & Levi, CG (2007). Development of intermixed zones of alumina/zirconia in thermal barrier coating systems. Metallurg Mater Trans A 38, 848857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiger, MJ, Yanar, NM, Topping, MG, Pettit, FS & Meier, GH (1999). Thermal barrier coatings for the 21st century. Z Metallkd 90, 10691078.Google Scholar
Stough, MA & Hellmann, JR (2002). Solid solubility and precipitation in a single-crystal alumina–zirconia system. J Am Ceram Soc 85, 28952902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swiatnicki, W, Lartigue-Korinek, S & Laval, JY (1995). Grain boundary structure and intergranular segregation in Al2O3. Acta Metall Mater 43, 795805.10.1016/0956-7151(94)00256-HCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatlock, GJ, Ram, D & Wang, P (2009). High spatial resolution imaging of the segregation of reactive elements to oxide grain boundaries in alumina scales. Mater High Temp 26, 293298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, K, Lawrence, DJ, Larson, DJ, Olson, JD, Kelly, TF & Gorman, B (2007). In-situ site-specific specimen preparation for atom probe tomography. Ultramicroscopy 107, 131139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unocic, KA, Parish, CM & Pint, BA (2011). Characterization of the alumina scale formed on coated and uncoated doped superalloys. Surf Coat Technol 206, 15221528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassen, R, Stuke, A & Stöver, D (2009). Recent developments in the field of thermal barrier coatings. J Therm Spray Technol 18, 181186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L, Di, Y, Wang, H, Li, X, Dong, L & Liu, T (2019). Effect of lanthanum zirconate on high temperature resistance of thermal barrier coatings. Trans Indian Ceram Soc 78, 212218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, T, Yoshida, H, Ikuhara, Y, Sakuma, T, Muto, H & Sakai, M (2002). Grain boundary sliding and atomic structures in alumina bicrystals with [0001] symmetric tilt grain boundaries. Mater Trans 43, 15611565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, DP & Stringer, J (1980). Improvements in high temperature oxidation resistance by additions of reactive elements or oxide dispersions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 295, 309329.Google Scholar
Yoshida, H, Ikuhara, Y & Sakuma, T (2002). Grain boundary electronic structure related to the high-temperature creep resistance in polycrystalline Al2O3. Acta Mater 50, 29552966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Z, Wu, Q, Rickman, JM, Chan, HM & Harmer, MP (2013). Atomic-resolution observation of Hf-doped alumina grain boundaries. Scr Mater 68, 703706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Chen et al. supplementary material

Chen et al. supplementary material

Download Chen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 742.7 KB