Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:36:56.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The 1s-State Analysis Applied to High-Angle, Annular Dark-Field Image Interpretation—When Can We Use It?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2004

Geoffrey R. Anstis
Geoffrey R. Anstis
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, University of Technology, Sydney, P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia
Get access

Abstract

A small probe centered on an atomic column excites the bound and unbound states of the two-dimensional projected potential of the column. It has been argued that, even when several states are excited, only the 1s state is sufficiently localized to contribute a signal to the high-angle detector. This article shows that non-1s states do make a significant contribution for certain incident probe profiles. The contribution of the 1s state to the thermal diffuse scattering is calculated directly. Sub-Ångstrom probes formed by Cs-corrected lenses excite predominantly the 1s state and contributions from other states are not very large. For probes of lower resolution when non-1s states are important, the integrated electron intensity at the column provides a better estimate of image intensity.

Keywords

high-resolution electron microscopyscanning transmission electron microscopyhigh-angle annular dark-field imaging1s statethermal diffuse scatteringmultislice methodfrozen phonon
Type
Research Article
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , February 2004 , pp. 4 - 8
Copyright
© 2004 Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, S.C., Birkeland, C.R., & Cockayne, D.J.H. (1997). An approach to quantitative compositional profiling at near-atomic resolution using high-angle annular dark field imaging. Ultramicroscopy 69, 83–103.Google Scholar
Anstis, G.R. (1996). Corrections to atomic scattering factors for high-energy electrons arising from atomic vibrations. Acta Cryst A 52, 450–455.Google Scholar
Anstis, G.R. (2001). Imaging point defects using a transmission electron microscope with controllable spherical aberration. Philos Mag B 81, 1687–1699.Google Scholar
Anstis, G.R., Cai, D.Q., & Cockayne, D.J.H. (2003). Limitations on the s-state approach to the interpretation of sub-Ångstrom resolution electron microscope images and microanalysis. Ultramicroscopy 94, 309–327.Google Scholar
Cowley, J.M. (1988). Electron microscopy of crystals with time-dependent perturbations. Acta Cryst A 44, 847–853.Google Scholar
Cowley, J.M. (1995). Diffraction Physics (3rd ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
Dinges, C., Berger, A., & Rose, H. (1995). Simulation of TEM images considering phonon and electronic excitations. Ultramicroscopy 60, 49–70.Google Scholar
Howie, A. (1979). Image contrast and localized signal selection techniques. J Microsc 117, 11–24.Google Scholar
Loane, R.F., Xu, P., & Silcox, J. (1992). Incoherent imaging of zone axis crystals with ADF STEM. Ultramicroscopy 40, 121–138.Google Scholar
Pennycook, S.J. & Jesson, D.E. (1991). High-resolution Z-contrast imaging of crystals. Ultramicroscopy 37, 14–38.Google Scholar
Rafferty, B., Nellist, P.D., & Pennycook, S.J. (2001). On the origin of transverse incoherence in Z-contrast STEM. J Electron Microsc 50, 227–233.Google Scholar
Wang, Z.L. (1995). Dynamical theories of dark-field imaging using diffusely scattered electrons in STEM and TEM. Acta Cryst A 52, 569–585.Google Scholar
Wang, Z.L. & Cowley, J.M. (1989). Simulating high-angle annular dark-field STEM images including thermal diffuse scattering. Ultramicroscopy 31, 437–454.Google Scholar