Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-21T22:50:15.886Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false

The Failure of Galois Descent for p-Selmer Groups of Elliptic Curves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2024

ROSS PATERSON*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, University Place, Glasgow, G12 8QQ. e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

We show that if F is $\mathbb{Q}$ or a multiquadratic number field, $p\in\left\{{2,3,5}\right\}$, and $K/F$ is a Galois extension of degree a power of p, then for elliptic curves $E/\mathbb{Q}$ ordered by height, the average dimension of the p-Selmer groups of $E/K$ is bounded. In particular, this provides a bound for the average K-rank of elliptic curves $E/\mathbb{Q}$ for such K. Additionally, we give bounds for certain representation–theoretic invariants of Mordell–Weil groups over Galois extensions of such F.

The central result is that: for each finite Galois extension $K/F$ of number fields and prime number p, as $E/\mathbb{Q}$ varies, the difference in dimension between the Galois fixed space in the p-Selmer group of $E/K$ and the p-Selmer group of $E/F$ has bounded average.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

J. L., Alperin. Local Representation Theory, Camb. Stud. Adv. Math. vol.11, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986). Modular representations as an introduction to the local representation theory of finite groups.Google Scholar
W., Bosma, J., Cannon and C., Playoust. The Magma algebra system. I. The user language. J. Symbolic Comput. 24(3-4) (1997), 235–265. Computational algebra and number theory (London, 1993).Google Scholar
M., Bhargava and A., Shankar. The average size of the 5-Selmer group of elliptic curves is 6, and the average rank is less than 1. ArXiv:1312.7859v1 [math.NT] (2013).Google Scholar
M., Bhargava and A., Shankar. Binary quartic forms having bounded invariants, and the boundedness of the average rank of elliptic curves. Ann. of Math. (2) 181(1) (2015), 191–242.Google Scholar
M., Bhargava and A., Shankar. Ternary cubic forms having bounded invariants, and the existence of a positive proportion of elliptic curves having rank 0. Ann. of Math. (2) 181(2) (2015), 587–621.Google Scholar
P. J., Cho and K., Jeong. On the distribution of analytic ranks of elliptic curves. ArXiv:2003.09102v1 [math.NT] (2020).Google Scholar
C. W., Curtis and I., Reiner. Methods of Representation Theory, vol. I. With applications to finite groups and orders, Pure and Applied Mathematics. (Wiley-Interscience, 1981), xxi+819.Google Scholar
W., Duke. Elliptic curves with no exceptional primes. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 325(8) (1997), 813–818.Google Scholar
R., Greenberg. Introduction to Iwasawa theory for elliptic curves. Arithmetic algebraic geometry (Park City, UT, 1999), (2001), pp. 407–464.Google Scholar
D. R., Heath-Brown. The size of Selmer groups for the congruent number problem. Invent. Math. 111(1) (1993), 171–195.Google Scholar
D. R., Heath-Brown. The size of Selmer groups for the congruent number problem.II. Invent. Math. 118(2) (1994), 331–370. With an appendix by P. Monsky.Google Scholar
D., Kane. On the ranks of the 2-Selmer groups of twists of a given elliptic curve. Algebra Number Theory 7(5) (2013), 1253–1279.Google Scholar
K., Kato. p-adic Hodge theory and values of zeta functions of modular forms, Cohomologies p-adiques et applications arithmétiques, III (2004), pp. ix, 117–290.Google Scholar
K., Kramer. Arithmetic of elliptic curves upon quadratic extension. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 264(1) (1981), 121–135.Google Scholar
A., Lei and F., Sprung. Ranks of elliptic curves over Z2 -extensions. Israel J. Math. 236(1) (2020), 183–206.Google Scholar
B., Mazur. Rational points of abelian varieties with values in towers of number fields. Invent. Math. 18(1972), 183–266.Google Scholar
B., Mazur. Modular curves and arithmetic. Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, vol. 1, 2 (Warsaw, 1983), (1984), pp. 185–211.Google Scholar
J. S., Milne. On the arithmetic of abelian varieties. Invent. Math. 17 (1972) 177–190.Google Scholar
A., Morgan and R., Paterson. On 2-Selmer groups of twists after quadratic extension, J. London Math. Soc. (2). 105(2) (2022), 1110–1166. ArXiv:2011.04374v1.Google Scholar
B., Mazur and K., Rubin. Kolyvagin systems. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 168(799) (2004), viii+96.Google Scholar
B., Mazur and K., Rubin. Finding large Selmer rank via an arithmetic theory of local constants. Ann. of Math. (2) 166(2) (2007), 579–612.Google Scholar
B., Mazur, K., Rubin and A., Silverberg. Twisting commutative algebraic groups. J. Algebra 314(1) (2007), 419–438.Google Scholar
J., Neukirch. Class Field Theory (Springer, Heidelberg, 2013). The Bonn lectures, edited and with a foreword by Alexander Schmidt, Translated from the 1967z German original by F. Lemmermeyer and W. Snyder, Language editor: A. Rosenschon.Google Scholar
J., Park, B., Poonen, J., Voight and M. M., Wood. A heuristic for boundedness of ranks of elliptic curves. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 21(9) (2019), 2859–2903.Google Scholar
B., Poonen and E., Rains. Random maximal isotropic subspaces and Selmer groups J. Amer. Math. Soc. 25(1) (2012), 245–269.Google Scholar
D. E., Rohrlich. On L-functions of elliptic curves and cyclotomic towers, Invent. Math. 75(3) (1984), 409–423.Google Scholar
P., Swinnerton-Dyer. The effect of twisting on the 2-Selmer group. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 145(3) (2008), 513–526.Google Scholar
J. H., Silverman. The arithmetic of elliptic curves, 2nd ed. Graduate Texts in Math. vol.106 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2009).Google Scholar
J. H., Silverman. Advanced topics in the arithmetic of elliptic curves. Graduate Texts in Math. vol.151 (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994).Google Scholar
L. C., Washington. Galois cohomology. Modular forms and Fermat’s last theorem (Boston, MA, 1995), (1997), pp. 101–120.Google Scholar
A., Wiles. Modular elliptic curves and Fermat’s last theorem. Ann. of Math. (2) 141(3) (1995), 443–551.Google Scholar
D., Zywina. Elliptic curves with maximal Galois action on their torsion points. Bull. London Math. Soc. 42(5) (2010), 811–826.Google Scholar