Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:25:00.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Closed area management taken after the ‘Prestige’ oil spill: effects on industrial fisheries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2009

A. Punzón ,
V. Trujillo ,
J. Castro ,
N. Perez ,
J.M. Bellido ,
E. Abad ,
B. Villamor ,
P. Abaunza  and
F. Velasco
A. Punzón*
Affiliation:
Instituto Español de Oceanografía. Promontorio de San Martín S/N, PO Box 240, 39080 Santander, Spain
V. Trujillo
Affiliation:
Instituto Español de Oceanografía. Cabo Estay Canido S/N, PO Box 1552, 36280 Vigo, Spain
J. Castro
Affiliation:
Instituto Español de Oceanografía. Cabo Estay Canido S/N, PO Box 1552, 36280 Vigo, Spain
N. Perez
Affiliation:
Instituto Español de Oceanografía. Cabo Estay Canido S/N, PO Box 1552, 36280 Vigo, Spain
J.M. Bellido
Affiliation:
Instituto Español de Oceanografía. Cabo Estay Canido S/N, PO Box 1552, 36280 Vigo, Spain
E. Abad
Affiliation:
Instituto Español de Oceanografía. Promontorio de San Martín S/N, PO Box 240, 39080 Santander, Spain
B. Villamor
Affiliation:
Instituto Español de Oceanografía. Promontorio de San Martín S/N, PO Box 240, 39080 Santander, Spain
P. Abaunza
Affiliation:
Instituto Español de Oceanografía. Promontorio de San Martín S/N, PO Box 240, 39080 Santander, Spain
F. Velasco
Affiliation:
Instituto Español de Oceanografía. Promontorio de San Martín S/N, PO Box 240, 39080 Santander, Spain
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: A. Punzón, Instituto Español de Oceanografía. Promontorio de San Martín S/N, PO Box 240, 39080 Santander, Spain email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

After the sinking of the oil carrier ‘Prestige’, which occurred in November 2002, approximately 60,000 mt of heavy oil (type M-100) were spilled into the ocean. Immediately after the accident, a series of management measures were applied to fisheries in the area, resulting in the establishment of various closed areas. Four of the most important fleets operating in the north and north-east of the Iberian Peninsula were affected (otter trawl, pair trawl, purse seine and hand line fishing gears). These fleets exploit important fisheries resources, some of them currently beyond their biological security limits. Reductions in effort were observed in all of them, particularly in the first three months of the ban and in the north-eastern area. However, apart from the hand line fleet, this did not involve a considerable reduction in the total effort produced by each of the fleets in 2003. The pair trawlers perform two trip types, but no differences in the specific composition were observed in any of them during the three years under analysis. Five types of trawling trip were identified, but important reductions were only observed for Norwegian lobster, with the fleet targeting this species as well as hake, megrim and monkfish.

Keywords

industrial fisheriesnorth-east Atlanticoil spillclosed areas
Type
Research Article
Information
Marine Biodiversity Records , Volume 2 , January 2009 , e75
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beddington, J.R. and Rettig, R.B. (1984) Approaches to the regulation of fishing effort. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper no. 243.Google Scholar
Bellido, J.M., Pérez, N., Castro, J. and Araujo, H. (2003) Some insights on a possible métiers definition of the north coast Spanish demersal fishery by using total catch data. Working Paper ICES WGHMM, Copenhagen, 14 – 23 May 2003.Google Scholar
Born, F.A., Espinoza, E., Murillo, J.C., Nicolaides, F. and Edgar, G.J. (2003) Effects of the Jessica oil spill on artisanal fisheries in the Galápagos. Marine Pollution Bulletin 47, 319–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CEDRE (Centre de Documentation de Recherche et d'Experimentations sur les pollutions accidentalles des eaux) (2004) Spécial accident du Prestige. Bulletin d'Information du centre de Documentation de Recherche et d'Experimentations sur les Pollutions Accidentelles des Eaux, no. 19, 24 pp.Google Scholar
Coates, P.J. (1998) The Sea Empress oil spill and its effect on the fisherman and fisheries of South West Wales. In Edwards, R. (ed.) The Sea Empress Oil Conference Proceedings. Lavenham, UK: CIWEM Publications.Google Scholar
Crean, K. and Lacambra, C. (2003) From population ecology to socio-economic and human health issues. In Lawrence, A.J. and Hemingway, K.L. (eds.) Effects of pollution on fish. Blackwell Publishing, 342 pp.Google Scholar
Dipper, F. and Chua, T.-E. (1997) Biological impacts of oil pollution: fisheries. International Petroleum Industry Environmental Conservation Association (IPIECA), Report Series, vol. 8. London, 28 pp.Google Scholar
Eberhardt, L.L. (1976) Quantitative ecology and impact assessment. Journal of Wildlife Management 4, 27–70.Google Scholar
Elliot, M., Hemingway, K.L., Krueger, D., Thiel, R., Hylland, K., Arukwe, A., Förlin, L. and Sayer, M. (2003) From the individual to the population and community responses to pollution. In Lawrence, A.J. and Hemingway, K.L. (eds.) Effects of pollution on fish. Blackwell Publishing, 342 pp.Google Scholar
Fisheries Research Service (2000) Case study: the grounding of the MV ‘Braer’. Aquatic Enviroment Information Leaflet, Fisheries Research Service (FRS), 2 pp.Google Scholar
Freire, J., Fernandez, L. and Muiño, R. (2006) Role of the Spanish scientific community in the initial assessment and management of the environmental damages caused by the Prestige oil spill. Marine Policy 30, 308–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Soto, C. (2004) ‘Prestige’ oil spill and Navidad flow. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 84, 297–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GESAMP (IMO/FAO/UNESCO/WMO/WHO/IAEA/UN/UNEP joint group of experts on the scientific aspects of marine pollution) (1993) Impact of oil and related chemicals and wastes on the marine environment. UNEP.Google Scholar
Gulland, J.A. (1974) Guidelines for fishery management. Indian Ocean Fishery Commission (FAO) no. 36, 84 pp.Google Scholar
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1999) Multivariate data analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall International, Inc., 832 pp.Google Scholar
ICES (2004a) Report of the ICES working group on northern pelagic and blue whiting fisheries. ICES Advisory Committee on Fishery Management (ACFM) ICES CM 2004/ACFM, 24.Google Scholar
ICES (2004b) Report of the working group on Nephrops stocks. ICES Advisory Committee on Fishery Management ICES CM 2004/ACFM, 19.Google Scholar
ICES (2005a) Report of the working group on the assessment of southern shelf stocks of hake, monk and megrim. ICES Advisory Committee on Fishery Management ICES CM 2005/ACFM, 02.Google Scholar
ICES (2005b) Working group on the assessment of mackerel, horse mackerel, sardine and anchovy. Advisory Committee on Fishery Management ICES CM 2005/ACFM, 08.Google Scholar
Kaufman, I. and Rousseeuw, P.L. (1990) Finding groups in data. An introduction to cluster analysis. New York: Wiley-Interscience Publication, 342 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, J.E., Pawson, M.G., Pickett, G.D. and Jennings, S. (1998) The impact of the ‘Sea Empress’ oil spill on seabass recruitment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 36, 677–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, R.J. and Kelly, C. (2004) The impact of the “Sea Empress” oil spill. Aquatic Living Resources 17, 389–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindeboom, H.J. (1994) Protected areas in the North Sea: an absolute need for future marine research. Helgoländer Meeresunters 49, 591–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moller, T.H., Dicks, B., Whittle, K.J. and Girin, M. (1999) Fishing and harvesting bans in oil spill response. Proceedings of the 1999 International Oil Spill Conference, API Publications no. 4686B, 693–699.Google Scholar
Pastoors, M.A., Rijnsdorp, A.D. and van Beek, F.A. (2000) Effects of a partially closed area in the North Sea (“plaice box”) on stock development of plaice. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57, 1014–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereda, P. and Villamor, B. (1991) Artisanal fisheries in the Cantabrian Sea. International Council for the Exploration of the Seas (CM Papers and Reports) CM 1991/G: 30.Google Scholar
Punzón, A., Costas, G., Gancedo, R. and Morlán, R. (2001) Segmentation of the mixed baca trawl fishery that exploits demersal resources in the Cantábrico (ICES Division VIIIc). International Council for the Exploration of the Seas (CM Papers and Reports) CM 2001/Q: 19.Google Scholar
Punzón, A. and Serrano, F. (2003) Presencia y cuantificación de fuel en el fondo de la plataforma del mar Cantábrico. IEO Prestige Web Report, no. 9: http://www.ieo.es/prestige/pdfs/Informe%20IEO%2009.pdf, 4 pp.Google Scholar
Punzón, A., Villamor, B. and Preciado, I. (2004) Analysis of the hand line fishery targeting mackerel (Scomber scombrus, L.) in the north of Spain (ICES Division VIIIbc). Fisheries Research 69, 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, T.J. II and Deriso, R.B. (1999) Quantitative fish dynamics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijnsdorp, A.D., Piet, G.J. and Poos, J.J. (2001) Effort allocation of the Dutch beam trawl fleet in response to a temporarily closed area in the North Sea. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, (CM Papers and Reports) CM 2001/N: 01.Google Scholar
Sanchez, F. (2003) Presencia y cuantificación de fuel en el fondo de la plataforma de Galicia y mar Cantábrico. Situación en primavera de 2003. IEO Prestige Web Report, no. 14: http://www.ieo.es/prestige/pdfs/Informe_IEO_14.pdf, 8 pp.Google Scholar
Sanchez, F., Velasco, F., Cartes, J.E., Olaso, I., Preciado, I., Fanelli, E., Serrano, A. and Zabala, J.L. (2005) Monitoring the Prestige impacts on commercial species of the Galicia and Cantabrian continental shelf (abundance, mortality, distribution patterns and feed habits in megrim, Norway lobster and hake). Marine Pollution Bulletin 53, 315–331.Google Scholar
Sobel, J. and Dahlgren, C. (2004) Marine reserves. A guide to science, design, and use. Washington DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Sumaila, U.R. (1998) Protected marine reserves as fisheries management tools: a bioeconomic analysis. Fisheries Research 37, 287–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Surís, J.C. and Garza, M.D. (2003) Evaluation of direct and indirect damages, methodology and work programme for the Prestige Case. In International Scientific Seminar “Economic, Social and Enviromental effects of the Prestige Oil slick”. Santiago de Compostela: Consello da Cultura Galega, 24 pp.Google Scholar
Trujillo, V., Punzón, A., Abaunza, P., Bellido, J.M., Fariña, A.C., Landa, J., Meixide, M., Pérez, N., Velasco, F. and Villamor, B. (2005) Has the Prestige oil spill altered fishing exploitation patterns in the main North Spanish fisheries? Symposium on Marine Accidental Oil Spills (VERTIMAR). [Poster.]Google Scholar
Villamor, B. (2003) Operatividad de las artes de pesca, cerco y línea de mano ante la presencia de fuel en el Cantábrico. IEO Prestige Web Report, no. 10: http://www.ieo.es/prestige/pdfs/Informe_IEO_10.pdf, 11 pp.Google Scholar
White, I.C. and Baker, J.M. (1998) The Sea Empress oil spill in context. In International Conference on the Sea Empress Oil Spill, February, Cardiff (Wales), 33 pp.Google Scholar