Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:24:03.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indigenous Research on Chinese Management: What and How

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Peter Ping Li ,
Kwok Leung ,
Chao C. Chen  and
Jar-Der Luo
Peter Ping Li
Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School, Denmark Renmin University, China
Kwok Leung
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Chao C. Chen
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, U.S.
Jar-Der Luo
Affiliation:
Tsinghua University, China
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We attempt to provide a definition and a typology of indigenous research on Chinese management as well as outline the general methodological approaches for this type of research. We also present an integrative summary of the four articles included in this special issue and show how they illustrate our definition and typology of indigenous research on Chinese management, as well as the various methodological approaches we advocate. Further, we introduce a commentary on the four articles from the perspective of engaged scholarship, and also three additional articles included in this issue. Finally, we conclude with our suggestions for future indigenous research.

Keywords

Chinese managementindigenous researchmethodologyqualitativetheory-building中国管理本土研究方法论质性研究理论构建
Type
From the Guest Editors
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 8 , Issue 1: Special Issue Indigenous Management Research in China , March 2012 , pp. 7 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. 1994. Observational techniques. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research: 377-392. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. M. 1985. Action science: Concepts, methods and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, M. 1994. Ethnography and participant observation. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research: 248-261. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. 1999. Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1): 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, B. L. 2009. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Bond, M. 2010. Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyacigiller, N. A., & Adler, N. J. 1991. The parochial dinosaur: Organizational science in a global context. Academy of Management Review, 16(2): 262–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charmaz, K. C. 2006. Constructive grounded theory: A practical guide through quantitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Chen, C. C., & Lee, Y. T. 2008. The diversity and dynamism of Chinese philosophies on leadership. In Chen, C. C. & Lee, Y. T. (Eds.), Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices: 1-27. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C. C., Chen, X. P., & Huang, S. S. Guanxi and social networking: An integrative review and future directions. Management and Organization Review, in press.Google Scholar
Chen, M.-J. 2002. Transcending paradox: The Chinese ‘middle way’ perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2-3): 179–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M.-J. 2008. Reconccptualizing the competition-cooperation relationship: A transparadox perspective, foumal of Management Inquire, 17(4): 288–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M.-J., & Miller, D. 2011. The relational perspective as a business mindset: Managerial implications for East and West. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(3): 6–18.Google Scholar
Chen, W. 2007. Docs the colour of the cat matter? The red hat strategy in China's private enterprises. Management and Organization Review, 3(1): 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. P., & Chen, C. C. 2004. On the intricacies of the Chinese guanxi: A process model of guanxi development. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(3): 305–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y., Friedman, R., Yu, E., Fang, W., & Lu, X. 2009. Supervisor-subordinate guanxi: Developing a three-dimensional model and scale. Management and Organization Review, 5(3): 375–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y.-R., Leung, K., & Chen, C. C. 2009. Bringing national culture to the table: Making a difference with cross-cultural differences and perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1): 217–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Farh, J. L. 2000. A triad model of paternalistic leadership: The constructs and measurement. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies (in Chinese), 14: 3–64.Google Scholar
Cheng, B. S., Wang, A. C., & Huang, M. P. 2009. The road more popular versus the road less travelled: An ‘insider's’ perspective of advancing Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, T. S., Chan, H. M., Chan, K. M., King, A. Y. C., Chiu, C. Y., & Yang, C. F. 2003. On Zhongyong rationality: The Confucian doctrine of the mean as a missing link between instrumental rationality and communicative rationality. Asian Journal of Social Science, 31(1): 107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, M. T. H. 1997. Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3): 271–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. B. 2005. The internationalization of Chinese firms: A case for theoretical extension? Management and Organization Review, 1(3): 381–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). 1994. Handbook of qualitative research: 105-117. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enriquez, V. G. 1990. Cross indigenous, methods and perspectives. In Enriquez, V. G. (Ed.), Indigenous psychology: A book of readings: 210-230. Quezon: Philippine Psychology Research and Training House.Google Scholar
Fang, T. 2010. Asian management research needs more self-confidence: Reflection on Hofstede (2007) and beyond. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(1): 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, T. 2012. Yin Yang: A new perspective on culture. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B.-S. 2000. A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In Li, J. T., Tsui, A. S. & Weldon, E. (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context: 94-127. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Farh, J. L., Cannella, A. A., & Lee, C. 2006. Approaches to scale development in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 2(3): 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fei, X. 1947/1992. From the soil: The foundations of Chinese society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gelfand, M. J., Erez, M., & Aycan, Z. 2007. Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58: 479–514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1995. The economic sociology of firms and entrepreneurs. In Portes, A. (Ed.), The economic sociology of immigration: Essays in networks, ethnicity and entrepreneurship: 128-165. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 2002. A theoretical agenda for economic sociology. In Guillen, M., Collins, R., England, P. & Meyer, M. (Eds.), The new economic sociology: Developments in an emerging field: 35-59. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Ho, D. Y.-F. 1976. On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4): 867–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, K. K. 1987. Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4): 944–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, K.-K. 2006. Constructive realism and Confucian relationalism: An epistemological strategy for the development of indigenous psychology. In Kim, U., Yang, G.-S. & Hwang, K.-K. (Eds.), International and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context: 73-107. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
jia, L., You, S., & Du, Y. 2012. Chinese context and theoretical contributions to management and organization research: A three-decade review. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 173–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. 2004. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7): 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, U., & Berry, J. W. (Eds.). 1993. Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context. Thousand oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Kim, U., & Park, Y.-S. 2005. Integrated analysis of indigenous psychologies: Comments and extensions of ideas presented by Shams, Jackson, Hwang and Kashima. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8(1): 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulik, C. T. 2011. Climbing the higher mountain: The challenges of multilevel, multisource, and longitudinal research designs. Management and Organization Review, 7(3): 447–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y. T., Han, A. G., Byron, T. K., & Fan, H. X. 2008. Daoist leadership, theory and application. In Chen, C. C. & Lee, Y. T. (Eds.), Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices: 83-107. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leung, K. 2009. Never the twain shall meet? Integrating Chinese and Western management research. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leung, K., & Brew, F. P. 2009. A cultural analysis of harmony and conflict: Towards an integrated model of conflict styles. In Wyer, R. S. Jr, Chiu, C. Y. & Hong, Y. Y. (Eds.), Understanding culture: Theory, research and application: 411-428. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Leung, K., Brew, F. P., Zhang, Z. X., & Zhang, Y. 2011. Harmony and conflict: A cross-cultural investigation in China and Australia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(5): 795–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, K. 1946. Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4): 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, F., & Leung, K. 2010. Future directions for Chinese indigenous management research (中国本土管理硏究的进路). Chinese Journal of Management (中国管理学报 in Chinese), 7(5): 642–648.Google Scholar
Li, P. P. 1998. Toward a geocentric framework of organizational form: A holistic, dynamic and paradoxical approach. Organization Studies, 19(5): 829–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P. 2005. The puzzle of China's township village enterprises: The paradox of local corporatism in a dual tack economic transition. Management and Organization Review, 1(2): 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P. 2006. Guanxi as the Chinese norm for personalized social capital: Toward an integrated duality framework of informal exchange. In Yeung, H. W. (Ed.), Handbook of research on Asian business: 62-83. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Li, P. P. 2008. Toward a geocentric framework of trust: An application to organizational trust. Management and Organization Review, 4(3): 413–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P. 2011. The rigor-relevance balance for engaged scholarship: New frame and new agenda for trust research and beyond. Journal of Trust Research, 1(1): 1–21.Google Scholar
Li, P. P. 2012. Exploring the unique roles of trust and play in private creativity: From the complexity-ambiguity-metaphor link to the trust-play-creativity link, Journal of Trust Research, 2(1): 71–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P. in press. Toward an integrative framework of indigenous research: The geocentric implications of Yin-Yang Balance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. DOI: 10.100/510490-011-9250-2.Google Scholar
Liang, S.-M. 1921/1997. The cultures and philosophies between the East and the West (in Chinese). Beijing: The Commerce Press.Google Scholar
Lin, N. 2002. How the East and West shall meet. Development and Society, 31(2): 211–244.Google Scholar
Lu, J., Liu, X., & Wang, H. 2011. Motives for outward FDI of Chinese private firms: Firm resources, industry dynamics, and government policies. Management and Organization Review, 7(2): 223–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, J.-D. 2011. Guanxi revisited: An exploratory study of familiar tics in a Chinese workplace. Management and Organizational Review, 7(2): 329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, J.-D., & Yeh, K. 2012. Neither collectivism nor individualism: Trust in the Chinese circles. Journal of Trust Research, 2(1): 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y., Sun, J., & Lu, S. C. 2011. Emerging economy copycats: Capability, environment and strategy. Academy of Management Perspective, 25(2): 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Y., Huang, Y., & Wang, S. L. 2012. Guanxi and organizational performance: A meta-analysis. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 139–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, D. 2012. A relational view of organizational restructuring: The case of transitional China. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 51–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. 2005. Parochialism in the evolution of a research community: The case of organization studies. Management and Organization Review, 1(1): 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, K. E. 2006. Asian management research needs more self-confidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(2): 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, M. W., Leung, K., Ames, D., & Lickel, B. 1999. Views from inside and outside: Integrating emic and etic insights about culture and justice judgment. Academy of Management Review, 24(4): 781–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Y., Rowney, J. A., & Peterson, M. F. 2012. The structure of Chinese cultural traditions: An empirical study of business employees in China. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, K.. 1959. The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Porter, L. W. 1996. Forty years of organization studies: Reflections from a micro perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2): 262–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, S. G. 1990. The spirit of Chinese capitalism. Berlin: de Gruytcr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, S. B., Duarte, R. D., & Carrieri, A. P. 2012. Indigenous or imported knowledge in Brazilian management studies: A quest for legitimacy? Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stacey, R. D., Griffin, D., & Shaw, P. 2000. Complexity and management: Fad or radical challenge to systems thinking. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sun, H., Chen, C. C., & Zhang, S.-H. 2008. Strategic leadership of Sunzi in TlieArt of War . In Chen, C. C. & Lee, Y. T. (Eds.), Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices: 143-168. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2004. Contributing to global management knowledge: A case for high quality indigenous research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(4): 491–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2006. Contextualization in Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 2(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2007. From homogenization to pluralism: International management research in the Academy and beyond. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6): 1353–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. S., Wang, H., Xin, K. R., Zhang, L. H., & Fu, P. P. 2004. Let a thousand flowers bloom: Variation of leadership styles in Chinese firms. Organization Dynamics, 3: 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. S., Nifadkar, S. S., & Ou, A. Y. 2007. Cross-national, cross-cultural organizational behavior research: Advances, gaps, and recommendations. Journal of Management, 33(3): 426–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Ven, A., & Jing, R. 2012. Indigenous management research in China from an Engaged Scholarship Perspective. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Ven, A. H. 2007. Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. 1997. Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Whetten, D. A. 2009. An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 29–55.Google Scholar
White, S. 2002. Rigor and relevance in Asian management research: Where are we and where can we go? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2-3): 287–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, M., Huang, X., Li, C., & Liu, W. 2012. Interactional justice and trust-in-supervisor as mediators for paternalistic leadership. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, K. S. 1993. Why do we need to develop a Chinese indigenous psychology? Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies (in Chinese), 1(1): 6–88.Google Scholar
Yang, K. S. 2000. Monocultural and cross-cultural indigenous approaches: The royal road to the development of a balanced global psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(3): 241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, X. H., Peng, Y. Q. & Lee, Y. T. 2008. The Confucian and Mencian philosophy of benevolent leadership. In Chen, C. C. & Lee, Y. T. (Eds.), Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices: 31-50. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. 2009. Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar