Article contents
Persuasion to Virtue: A Preliminary Statement
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 July 2024
Extract
With increasing incidences of deviance exemplified by campus disorders, community crime, civil disobedience, and interpersonal aggression, demands for law and order emanate from various segments of the general population. Concurrently, the search for effective means of assuring compliance to law becomes more fervent. Some policy-planners, legislators, policemen, judges, and educators seek new insights and greater understanding about obedience, but society's response is primarily expressed in terms of increased surveillance, detection, and punishment (which ironically may function to complicate compliance problems). In coping with disobedience, whether individual or collective, violent or nonviolent, little serious attention is paid to the origins of deviance and particularly to the antecedents of compliance. Yet it is from knowledge about the origins of obedience and the related ideas of normal populations about the legal process that the problems of deviance can best be understood and stratagems for social change most effectively realized.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1970 by the Law and Society Association
Footnotes
AUTHORS' NOTE: The analysis presented herein is derived in part from data gathered pursuant to a contract with the United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Office of Education, Project 2947 under Contract OE 5–10–219, entitled “Authority, Rules, and Aggression: A Cross-national Study of Socialization into Compliance Systems.” The principal investigators in that study were Professor Robert D. Hess (project director), Professor Leigh Minturn (senior investigator), and the first author of the present paper (co-principal investigator). The results of that initial study have been submitted to U.S.O.E. in two volumes: Part I co-authored by Hess and Tapp with cross-national collaborators (March 1969), and Part II co-authored by Minturn and Tapp with cross-national collaborators (January 1970). Plans are in process to make this data available in other forms also.
The present authors are indebted to Professors Minturn and Hess, cross-national principal investigators for the project and senior investigators, for their initial collaborative efforts in the underlying research. We are also indebted to Roberta Tabor, research assistant, and Brenda Smith, secretary, for supportive services. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the American Bar Foundation which enabled completion of this work.
References
- 16
- Cited by