Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:07:53.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chile's 2015 Electoral Reform: Changing the Rules of the Game

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Ricardo Gamboa  and
Mauricio Morales
Ricardo Gamboa
Affiliation:
Institute of International Studies of the University of Chile. [email protected]
Mauricio Morales
Affiliation:
School of Political Science, Universidad Diego Portales, and Center for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies (CONICYT/FONDAP/15130009). [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 2015, a center-left government introduced an electoral reform that replaced the binomial electoral system governing parliamentary elections since 1989 with a more proportional system. This article provides an account of the reform process, describes the new electoral law, and discusses the factors explaining the reform. We argue, first, that it was possible, due to the incentives the government provided, to secure the support of an ample majority of parliamentarians; also, a new and favorable political scenario had emerged, in which the support of the main right-wing parties was not necessary for the reform to pass. Second, we maintain that the reform sought mainly to resolve problems affecting the parties of the governing coalition related to negotiations of coalition lists for elections. As a complementary objective, the reform promoted a general interest by establishing rules that allowed a “fairer” system of representation and improved competitive conditions.

Type
Country Note
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , Winter 2016 , pp. 126 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bachelet, Michelle. 2014a. Mensaje de S.E. la Presidenta de la República con el que inicia un proyecto de ley que sustituye el sistema electoral binominal por un sistema electoral proporcional inclusivo y fortalece la representatividad del congreso nacional. http://www.camara.cl/pley/pley_detalle.aspx?prmID=9742&prmBL=9326-07. Accessed April 1, 2015.Google Scholar
Bachelet, Michelle. 2014b. Programa de gobierno 2014–18. www.michellebachelet.cl. Accessed April 1, 2015.Google Scholar
Cámara de Diputados de Chile. 2014. Informe de la Comisión de Constitución sobre proyecto de reforma electoral. Boletín 9326-07. www.camara.cl Google Scholar
Carey, John. 2015. Malapportionment and Ideological Bias in Chilean Electoral Districts. http://sites.dartmouth.edu/jcarey/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooperativa. 2012. Census 2012. www.cooperativa.cl/noticias/site/artic/20130425/asocfile/20130425190105/resultados_censo_2012_poblacion_vivienda_tomosiyii.pdf. Accessed December 15, 2015.Google Scholar
Farrell, David. 2001. Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Gamboa, Ricardo. 2009. Los proyectos legislativos de reforma al sistema binominal. In Reforma al sistema electoral chileno, ed. Fontaine, Arturo, Larroulet, Cristián, Walker, Ignacio, and Navarrete, Jorge. Santiago: CEP/PNUD. 245–61.Google Scholar
Garretón, Manuel. 1991. La redemocratización política en Chile. Transición, inauguración y evolución. Estudios Públicos 42:101–33.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark, Alles, Santiago, and Tchintian, Carolina. 2012. Cuotas de género, leyes electorales y elección de legisladoras en América Latina. Revista de Ciencia Política 32, 2: 331–57.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loosemore, John, and Hanby, Victor. 1971. The Theoretical Limits of Maximum Distortion: Some Analytical Expressions for Electoral Systems. British Journal of Political Science 1:467–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Mercurio (Santiago). 2014. Gobierno logra acuerdo para cambiar el binominal al asegurar votos de Amplitud e independientes. June 30. http://www.emol.com/noticias/nacional/2014/06/30/667682/gobierno-por-binominal.html. Accessed April 5, 2015.Google Scholar
El Mercurio (Santiago) 2015. Alianza critica reforma al binominal: le regala de 8 a 10 parlamentarios a la Nueva Mayoría. January 14. http://www.emol.com/noticias/nacional/2015/01/14/699053/alianza-y-reforma-al-binominal.html. Accessed April 5, 2015.Google Scholar
Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (PNUD). 2014. Auditoría a la democracia. Más y mejor democracia para un Chile inclusivo. Santiago: PNUD.Google Scholar
República de Chile. Senado. Election data. www.senado.cl Google Scholar
Rivas, Sebastián. 2014. Calculadora en mano. Revista Qué Pasa, April 30. http://www.quepasa.cl/articulo/politica/2014/04/19-14308-9-calculadora-en-mano.shtml/ Google Scholar
Servicio Electoral de Chile (Servel). various years. Election data. www.servel.cl Google Scholar
La Tercera (Santiago). 2014. Gobierno logra alinear al oficialismo en reforma al binominal. August 8. http://www.latercera.com/noticia/politica/2014/08/674-591292-9-gobierno-logra-alinear-al-oficialismo-en-reforma-al-binominal.shtml. Accessed April 5, 2015.Google Scholar
Tribunal Constitucional. 2015. Sentencia causa rol 2777-15, 3.30.2015.Google Scholar
Zapata, Patricio. 2015. Attorney, Pdc. Author interview. Santiago, September 4.Google Scholar