Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:44:07.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quarrying Evidence at the Quispisisa Obsidian Source, Ayacucho, Peru

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Nicholas Tripcevich  and
Daniel A. Contreras
Nicholas Tripcevich
Affiliation:
Archaeological Research Facility, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 ([email protected])
Daniel A. Contreras
Affiliation:
Archaeology Center, Stanford University, P.O. Box 20446, Stanford, CA 94309 (dcontre@ Stanford .edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Artifacts made from Quispisisa obsidian are widely disseminated in the Peruvian Andes, but the geological source of the Quispisisa geochemical type was only recently located in southern Ayacucho. Following the positive identification of the source in 1999 by Richard Burger and colleagues, we found evidence of broad quarrying activities in unexplored portions of the source area. We describe 34 quarry pits, some as large as 80 m across, together with evidence of early-stage lithic reduction at the source. We encountered high concentrations of reduction debris associated with more extensive knapping in two localities, but our preliminary evaluation of surface evidence suggests that much of the material quarried was removed from the area as intact nodules or after minimal reduction at the source area.

Resumen

Resumen

Los estudios geoquímicos de la obsidiana en los Andes Centrales han demostrado que la gran mayoría de los artefactos prehispánicos hechos de obsidiana se produjeron utilizando materia prima de ocho fuentes, cada una de las cuales es distinta en términos de composición geoquímica. De las ocho fuentes, material de Alca, Chivay, y Quispisisa predomina en las colecciones de todas las épocas prehispánicas. El tipo geoquímico de obsidiana llamado Quispisisa ocupa una posición importante en la historia del Perú prehispánico, pues herramientas hechas de este material se han encontrado en muchos sitios de la costa y sierra de la parte norcentral del país. Esos sitios se caracterizan por encontrarse dispersos en un amplio marco espacial y temporal, pues algunos se ubican en lugares distantes de la fuente y corresponden a épocas diversas, inclusive, algunas de ellas tan antiguas como el Precerámico Temprano. A pesar de esa importancia evidente, hasta la fecha solo se había ubicado la fuente, y faltaba cualquier exploración y registro detallado de los afloramientos de obsidiana y de los rasgos de explotación humana de la zona. A partir del año 2007 Tripcevich y Contreras visitaron la fuente ubicada por Richard Burger y sus colegas en la zona de Huanca Sancos, Ayacucho; posteriormente en el año 2009 los autores, con el apoyo de unas colegas, ampliaban las investigaciones y como producto de ello han revelado que el área geográfica que abarca la fuente de obsidiana tipo Quispisisa es mucho más extensa de lo que se había pensado. Asimismo, han logrado documentar la existencia de varios rasgos de explotación de la fuente tales como: pozos de cantera, lascas de reducción inicial de material, y caminos, los mismos que evidencian la presencia de la actividad de la cantería de obsidiana a una escala única en los Andes.

Type
Articles
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 121 - 136
Copyright
Copyright ©2011 by the Society for American Archaeology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Bencic, Catherine M. 2000 Industrias líticas de Huari y Tiwanaku. In Huari y Tiwanaku: Modelos vs. evidencias, edited by Peter Kaulicke and William H. Isbell, pp. 89–118. Boletín de Arqueología PUCP Vol. 4. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú Fondo Editorial, Lima.Google Scholar
Burger, Richard L. 1984 Archaeological Areas and Prehistoric Frontiers: The Case of Formative Peru and Ecuador. In Social and Economic Organization in the Prehispanic Andes, edited by David L. Browman, Richard L. Burger, and Mario Rivera, pp. 33–71. BAR International Series Vol. 194.Google Scholar
Burger, Richard L. 2007 Late Paracas Obsidian Tools from Animas Altas, Peru. Andean Past 8:477–492.Google Scholar
Burger, Richard L., and Asaro, Frank 1977 Trace Element Analysis of Obsidian Artifacts from the Andes: New Perspectives on Pre-Hispanic Economic Interaction in Peru and Bolivia—LBL6343. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley. Electronic document, http://escholarship.org/uc/item/2kr0k9c1 Google Scholar
Burger, Richard L., and Asaro, Frank 1979 Análisis de rasgos significativos en la Obsidiana de los Andes Centrales. Revista del Museo Nacional–Lima 43:281–326.Google Scholar
Burger, Richard L., Asaro, Frank, Michael, Helen V., and Stross, Fred H. 1984 The Source of Obsidian Artifacts at Chavín de Huántar. Appendix E. In The Prehistoric Occupation of Chavín de Huántar, Peru, edited by Richard L. Burger, Vol. 14:263–270. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Burger, Richard L., and Glascock, Michael D. 2000 Locating the Quispisisa Obsidian Source in the Department of Ayacucho, Peru. Latin American Antiquity 11(3):258–268.Google Scholar
Burger, Richard L., and Glascock, Michael D. 2002 Tracking the Source of Quispisisa Type Obsidian from Huancavelica to Ayacucho. In Andean Archaeology I: Variations in Sociopolitical Organization, edited by William H. Isbell and Helaine Silverman, pp. 341–368. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, Richard L., and Glascock, Michael D. 2009 Intercambio prehistórico de obsidiana a larga distancia en el norte peruano. Revista del Museo de Arqueología, Antropología e Historia 11:17-50.Google Scholar
Burger, Richard L., Lau, George F., Ponte, Víctor M., and Glascock, Michael D. 2006 The History of Prehispanic Obsidian Procurement in Highland Ancash. In La Complejidad Social en la Sierra de Ancash, edited by Alexander Herrera, Carolina Orsini, and Kevin Lane, pp. 103–120. Castello Sforzesco, Raccolte Extraeuropee, Milan.Google Scholar
Burger, Richard L., Mohr Chávez, Karen L., and Chávez, Sergio J. 2000 Through the Glass Darkly: Prehispanic Obsidian Procurement and Exchange in Southern Peru and Northern Bolivia. Journal of World Prehistory 14(3):267–362.Google Scholar
Burton, John 1984 Quarrying in a Tribal Society. World Archaeology 16(2):234–247.Google Scholar
Castillo, Luis Jaime 2000 La presencia de Wari en San José de Moro. In Huari y Tiwanaku: modelos vs. evidencias, edited by Peter Kaulicke and William H. Isbell, pp. 143–179. Boletín de Arqueología PUCP Vol. 4. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú Fondo Editorial, Lima.Google Scholar
José, Castillo M., and Javier, Barreda A. 1973 Mapa geológico del cuádrangulo de Santa Ana (29-ñ). INGEMMET, República del Perú, Sector Energía y Metalúrgico, Lima.Google Scholar
José, Castillo M., Javier, Barreda A., and Churchill, Vela V. 1993 Geología de los cuadrángulos de Laramate y Santa Ana. Boletín No. 45. INGEMMET, República del Perú, Sector Energía y Metalúrgico, Lima.Google Scholar
Clark, John E. 2003 A Review of Twentieth-Century Mesoamerican Obsidian Studies. In Mesoamerican Lithic Technology: Experimentation and Interpretation, edited by Kenneth G. Hirth, pp. 15–54. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Cobean, Robert H. 2002 A World of Obsidian: The Mining and Trade of a Volcanic Glass in Ancient Mexico. Serie Arqueología de México. Institute Nacional de Antropología e Historia/University of Pittsburgh, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Darras, Véronique 1999 Tecnologías prehispánicas de la obsidiana: Los centros de producción de la región de Zináparo-Prieto, Michoacán, México. Centre Français d’Études Mexicaines et Centramériaines, Mexico City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, Carolyn 2006 Rethinking Apacheta. Ñawpa Pacha 28:93-108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eerkens, Jelmer W., Vaughn, Kevin J., Carpenter, Tim R., Conlee, Christina A., Grados, Moises Linares, and Schreiber, Katharina 2008 Obsidian Hydration Dating on the South Coast of Peru. Journal of Archaeological Science 35:2231-2239.Google Scholar
Eerkens, Jelmer W., Vaughn, Kevin J., Linares-Grados, Moises, Conlee, Christina A., Schreiber, Katharina, Glascock, Michael D., and Tripcevich, Nicholas 2010 Spatio-Temporal Patterns in Obsidian Consumption in the Southern Nasca Region, Peru. Journal of Archaeological Science 37:825-832.Google Scholar
Ericson, Jonathon E. 1984 Towards the Analysis of Lithic Production Systems. In Prehistoric Quarries and Lithic Production, edited by Jonathon E. Ericson and Barbara A. Purdy, pp. 1-10. New Directions in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Glascock, Michael, Speakman, Robert J., and Burger, Richard L. 2007 Sources of Archaeological Obsidian in Peru: Descriptions and Geochemistry. In Archaeological Chemistry: Analytical Techniques and Archaeological Interpretation, edited by Michael Glascock, Robert J. Speakman, and Rachel S. Popelka-Filcoff, pp. 522-552. Oxford University Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Healan, Dan M. 1997 Pre-Hispanic Quarrying in the Ucareo-Zinapécuaro Obsidian Source Area. Ancient Mesoamerica 8:77-100.Google Scholar
Holmes, William Henry 1919 Handbook of Aboriginal American Antiquities, Pt.1: Introductory: The Lithic Industries. Bulletin of American Ethnology 60. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Jennings, Justin, and Glascock, Michael D. 2002 Description and Method of Exploitation of the Alca Obsidian Source, Peru. Latin American Antiquity 13(1):107-118.Google Scholar
Jett, Stephen C. 1994 Cairn Trail Shrines in Middle and South America. Yearbook, Conference of Latin Americanist Geographers 20:1-8.Google Scholar
Klink, Cynthia, and Aldenderfer, Mark 2005 A Projectile Point Chronology for the South-Central Andean Highlands. In Advances in Titicaca Basin Archaeology—1, edited by Charles Stanish, Amanda Cohen, and Mark Aldenderfer, pp. 25-54. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Kuznar, Lawrence A. 2001 An Introduction to Andean Religious Ethnoarchaeology: Preliminary Results and Future Directions. In Ethnoarchaeology of Andean South America: Contributions to Archaeological Method and Theory, edited by Lawrence A. Kuznar, pp. 38-66. Ethnoarchaeological Series Vol. 4. International Monographs in Prehistory, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
MacNeish, Richard. S. 1983 Ayacucho Preceramic as a Sequence of Cultural Energy-Flow Systems. In Prehistory of the Ayacucho Basin, Peru: Preceramic Way of Life, edited by R. S. MacNeish, R. K. Vierra, A. Nelken-Terner, R. Lurie, and A. G. Cook, Vol. 4:236-280. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
MacNeish, Richard. S., Vierra, R. K., Nelken-Terner, A., and Phagan, C. J. (editors) 1980 Prehistory of the Ayacucho Basin, Peru: Nonceramic Artifacts. 3. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yuichi, and Palomino, Yuri Cavero 2008 Campañayuq Rumi: Un centra ceremonial en forma de “U” en Vilcashuamán, Ayacucho, sierra centro-sur. In VI simposio internacional de arqueología PUCP: El periodo Formativo: Enfoques y evidencias recientes, Lima, Perú.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yuichi, and Palomino, Yuri Cavero 2009 Campañayuq Rumi: Perspectives on the Southern Frontier of the Chavín Sphere of Interaction. In The 37th Annual Midwest Conference on Andean and Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Nado, Kristin 2007 Trade, Culture, and Power in Prehistoric Peru: The Chemical Characterization of Obsidian from Chavín de Huántar. Unpublished B.A. honors thesis, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
Nash, Donna J. 2002 The Archaeology of Space: Places of Power in the Wari Empire. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida.Google Scholar
Owen, Bruce D., and Goldstein, Paul S. 2001 Tiwanaku en Moquegua: Interacciones regionales y colapso. In Horizonte Medio, edited by Peter Kaulicke, pp. 169-188. Boletín de Arqueología PUCP Vol. 2. Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima.Google Scholar
Pastrana, Alejandro 1998 La explotación azteca de la obsidiana en la Sierra de las Navajas. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Rademaker, Kurt 2006 Geoarchaeological Investigations of the Waynuna Site and the Alca Obsidian Source. Manuscript on file, University of Maine.Google Scholar
Rademaker, Kurt, Sandweiss, Dan, Malpass, Michael, Umire, Adam, de la Vera Cruz, Pablo, Fortin, Louis, and Morris, Ben 2004 Preceramic Utilization of the Alca Obsidian Source: Recent Results. Paper presented at the Northeast Conference on Andean Archaeology and Ethnohistory, Yale University, New Haven.Google Scholar
Stone, Jane 1983 The Socio-Economic Implications of Lithic Evidence from Huari, Peru. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York.Google Scholar
Torrence, Robin 1986 Production and Exchange of Stone Tools Prehistoric Obsidian in the Aegean. New Studies in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tripcevich, Nicholas 2007 Quarries, Caravans, and Routes to Complexity: Prehispanic Obsidian in the South-Central Andes. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Tripcevich, Nicholas, and Mackay, Alex 2011 Archaic and Formative Period Obsidian Procurement at the Chivay Source, Arequipa, Peru. World Archaeology: New Approaches to Stone Mines and Quarries 43(2), in press.Google Scholar
Vaughn, Kevin J., and Glascock, Michael D. 2005 Exchange of Quispisisa Obsidian in the Nasca Region: New Evidence from Marcaya. Andean Past 7:93-110.Google Scholar
Vining, Benjamin R. 2005 Social Pluralism and Lithic Economy at Cerro Baúl, Peru. BAR International Series, 1461. Hedges, Oxford.Google Scholar
Williams, Patrick Ryan, Dussubieux, Laure, and Nash, Donna J. 2011 Provenance of Peruvian Wari Obsidian: Comparing INAA, LA-ICP-MS, and Portable XRF. In The Dating and Provenance of Volcanic and Ancient Manufactured Glasses—A Global Overview, edited by Ioannis Liritzis and Chris Stevenson. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, in press.Google Scholar