Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:34:35.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quality Control and Chronology: Response to Inomata and Colleagues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2019

Michael Love Open the ORCID record for Michael Love [Opens in a new window]
Michael Love*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, California State University, Northridge, Northridge, CA 91330–8244, USA
*
([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I thank my colleagues for their comments, but I disagree with their assessment.

Agradezco a mis colegas por sus comentarios, pero estoy en desacuerdo con su evaluación.

Keywords

MesoamericapreclassicchronologyMesoaméricacronologíapreclásico
Type
Comment
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , March 2019 , pp. 227 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 by the Society for American Archaeology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Arroyo, Barbara, Pereira, Karen, Cossich, Margarita, Paiz, Lorena, Arévalo, Edgar, de León, Mónica, Alvarado, Carlos, and Quiroa, Fabiola 2007 Proyecto de Rescate Naranjo: Nuevos Datos del Preclásico en el Valle de Guatemala. In XX Simposio de Investigaciones Arqueológicas en Guatemala, edited by Laporte, Juan Pedro, Arroyo, Bárbara, and E. Mejía, Héctor, pp. 861–874. Ministerio de Cultura y Deportes, Guatemala City.Google Scholar
Inomata, Takeshi, Raúl Ortiz, Bárbara Arroyo and Robinson, Eugenia J. 2014 Chronological Revision of Preclassic Kaminaljuyú, Guatemala: Implications for Social Process in the Southern Maya Area. Latin American Antiquity 25:377–408.Google Scholar
Love, Michael 2018 Kaminaljuyu Chronology and Ceramic Analysis: An Alternative View. Latin American Antiquity 29: 260–278.Google Scholar