Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T08:35:47.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stopping power in nonideal plasmas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

K. Morawetz
K. Morawetz
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, AG “Theoretische Vielteilchenphysik” an der Universität Rostock, 18055 Rostock, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The stopping power of dense nonideal plasmas is calculated in different many-body approximations. The T-matrix approximation of binary collisions is compared with the random phase approximation (RPA) approximation of dielectric fluctuations. It is found that RPA contributions are more important for dense plasmas at low temperatures. Within a microscopic model, the dynamical evolution of the velocity of the projectile is calculated. It reproduces experimental values well for the stopping of fast heavy ions at times after a pinch discharge. Further improvements due to memory effects and relaxation fields are discussed. A renormalization of the effective energy transfer by memory effects is presented.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 611 - 624
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brouwer, H.H. et al. 1990a Contrib. Plasma Phys. 30, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, H.H. et al. 1990b Contrib. Plasma Phys. 30, 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, C. 1992 Laser Part. Beams 10, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, C. 1995 Phys. Rev. E 51, 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, D.H.H. et al. 1990 Phys. Rev. A 42, 2313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichimaru, S. 1973 Basic Principles in Plasma Physics (Benjamin, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
Kraeft, W.D. & Strege, B. 1988 Physica A 149, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morawetz, K. 1994 Phys. Rev. E 50, 4625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morawetz, K. 1995 Phys. Lett. A 199, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morawetz, K. & Jauho, A.P. 1994 Phys. Rev. E 50, 474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morawetz, K. & Kremp, D. 1993 Phys. Lett. A 173, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morawetz, K. & Röpke, G. 1995 Phys. Rev. E 51, 4246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morawetz, K. & Röpke, G. 1996 Phys. Rev. E 54, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morawetz, K. et al. 1994 Phys. Lett. A 190, 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peter, T. & Meyer-Ter-Vehn, J. 1991 Phys. Rev. A 43, 1989.Google Scholar
Röpke, G. & Redmer, R. 1989 Phys. Rev. A 39, 907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetzler, H. et al. 1995 in High Energy Density in Matter (GSI-Jahresbericht 1994, GSI Darmstadt), p. 11.Google Scholar
Zwicknagel, G. 1994 Ph.D. thesis, University Erlangen.Google Scholar
Zwicknagel, G. et al. 1995 Laser Part. Beams 13, 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar