Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:43:16.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Community’, semiotic flows, and mediated contribution to activity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2009

Steven L. Thorne
Steven L. Thorne*
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article begins with an overview and problematization of the term community through a brief assessment of its history, diverse uses, core attributes, heterogeneous elements, and collocational companions. Following this, I describe demographics and processes associated with collective engagement in digitally mediated environments. Utilizing select alternatives to the term ‘community’ and incorporating the cultural-historical notions of mediation and activity, I then present research describing exogenous influences affecting educational uses of technology in L2 settings, the use of instant messaging and blogging for out-of-class FL interaction at the secondary school level, and a pedagogically focused example of a remixing text posted to an online fan fiction website. I conclude by proposing bridging activities as an approach for connecting the emergent logics of digital vernaculars with the analytics of formal schooling.

Type
Plenary Speeches
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 81 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barton, D. & Tusting, K. (2005). Introduction. In Barton, & Tusting, (eds.), 1–13.Google Scholar
Barton, D. & Tusting, K. (eds.) (2005a). Beyond communities of practice. New York: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belz, J. & Thorne, S. L. (eds.) (2006). Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston, MA: Heinle.Google Scholar
Black, R. W. (2005). Access and affiliation: The literacy and composition practices of English language learners in an online fanfiction community. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 49, 118–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, R. W. (2006). Language, culture, and identity in online fanfiction. E-learning 3, 170–184.Google Scholar
Black, R. W. (2008). Adolescents and online fan fiction. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. & Hall, K. (2004). Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research. Language in Society 33, 469–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2006). Toward a writing pedagogy of shuttling between language: Learning from multilingual writers. College English 68, 589–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C. & Leu, D. (eds.) (2008). Handbook of research on new literacies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknapp Press.Google Scholar
Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (eds.) (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duff, P. (2007). Second language socialization as sociocultural theory: Insights and issues. Language Teaching 40, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education & Work 14, 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, T. (1997). Social interaction on the net: Virtual community as participatory genre. Proceedings of the Thirtieth Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science (vol. 6). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 23–30.Google Scholar
Gee, P. (2005). Semiotic social spaces and affinity spaces: From the Age of Mythology to today's schools. In Barton, & Tusting, (eds.), 214–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1971). Language in social groups. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, W. (1996). Language and communicative practice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of hope. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Khan, A. (2007). Good to think? Creolization, optimism, and agency. Current Anthropology 48, 653–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinginger, C. (2002). Defining the zone of proximal development in US foreign language education. Applied Linguistics 23, 240–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2006). From communicative competence to symbolic competence. The Modern Language Journal 90, 249–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C. & Thorne, S. L. (2002). Foreign language learning as global communicative practice. In Block, D. & Cameron, D. (eds.), Globalization and language teaching. London: Routledge, 83–100.Google Scholar
Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2007). Sampling ‘the new’ in new literacies. In Knobel, M. & Lankshear, C. (eds.), A new literacies sampler. New York: Peter Lang, 1–24.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the sociogenesis of second language development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMillan, D. W. & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology 14, 6–23.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardi, B. (ed.) (1996). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human–computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project. (2008). Standards for foreign language learning in the 21st century. Yonkers, NY: Allen Press.Google Scholar
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies. Harvard Educational Review 66, 60–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nystrand, M. (1982). What writers know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1992). Indexing gender. In Duranti, A. & Goodwin, C. (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 335–358.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. (1998). Speech community. In Vershueren, J., Östman, J. O., Blommaert, J. & Bulcaen, C. (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–34.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. (2006). Language in late modernity: Interaction in an urban school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Roth, W.-M. & Lee, Y.-J. (2006). Contradictions in theorising and implementing communities in education. Educational Research Review 1, 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23, 193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In Lantolf, J. (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 97–114.Google Scholar
Sykes, J., Oskoz, A. & Thorne, S. L. (2008). Web 2.0, synthetic immersive environments, and mobile resources for language education. CALICO Journal 25, 528–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, S. L. (2000). Beyond bounded activity systems: Heterogeneous cultures in instructional uses of persistent conversation. Proceedings of the Thirty-third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-33). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1–10.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology 7, 38–67.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. L. (2004). Cultural historical activity theory and the object of innovation. In van Esch, K. & John, O. St., (eds.). New insights into foreign language learning and teaching. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 51–70.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. L. (2005). Epistemology, politics, and ethics in sociocultural theory. Modern Language Journal 89, 393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, S. L. (2006). Pedagogical and praxiological lessons from Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education research. In Belz, J. & Thorne, S. L. (eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston, MA: Thomson Heinle Publishers, 2–30.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. L. & Black, R. W. (2008). Language and literacy development in computer-mediated contexts and communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 27, 133–160.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. L. & Lantolf, J. P. (2007). A linguistics of communicative activity. In Makoni, S. & Pennycook, A. (eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 170–195.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. L. & Payne, J. S. (2005). Evolutionary trajectories, Internet-mediated expression, and language education. CALICO Journal 22, 371–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, S. L. & Reinhardt, J. (2008). ‘Bridging activities’, new media literacies and advanced foreign language proficiency. CALICO Journal 25, 558–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, C. & McKay, S. (2003). Profiling ‘new’ communication technologies in adolescence. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 22, 94–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2008). How are humans unique? New York Times, 26 May 2008.Google Scholar
Tönnies, F. (2001 [1887]). Community and civil society (Harris, Jose, ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vološinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S. & Souberman, E., eds.). Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (vol. 1): Problems of general psychology: Including the volume Thinking and speech (Reiber, R. W. & Carton, A. S., eds.). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. (1976). Key words. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar