Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:35:44.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Good Enough Heart: Kant and the Cultivation of Emotions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2017

Krista K. Thomason*
Affiliation:
Swarthmore College

Abstract

One way of understanding Kant’s views about moral emotions is the cultivation view. On this view, emotions play a role in Kantian morality provided they are properly cultivated. I evince a sceptical position about the cultivation view. First, I show that the textual evidence in support of cultivation is ambiguous. I then provide an account of emotions in Kant’s theory that explains both his positive and negative views about them. Emotions capture our attention such that they both disrupt the mind’s composure and serve as a surrogate for reason. As such, Kant cannot recommend that we cultivate our emotions.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Kantian Review 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baron, Marcia (1995) Kantian Ethics Almost Without Apology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Baxley, Anne Margaret (2010) Kant’s Theory of Virtue: The Value of Autocracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Borges, Maria (2004) ‘What Can Kant Teach us about Emotions?’. Journal of Philosophy, 101, 140158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borges, Maria (2008) ‘Physiology and the Controlling of Affects in Kant’s Philosophy’. Kantian Review, 13, 4666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Alix (2016) ‘The Role of Feelings in Kant’s Account of Moral Education’. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 50, 511523.Google Scholar
Deimling, Wiebke (2014) ‘Kant’s Pragmatic Concept of Emotions’. In Alix Cohen (ed.) Kant on Emotion and Value (New York: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 108125.Google Scholar
Denis, Lara (2000) ‘Kant’s Cold Sage and the Sublimity of Apathy’. Kantian Review, 4, 4873.Google Scholar
Fahmy, Melissa Seymour (2009) ‘Active Sympathetic Participation: Reconsidering Kant’s Duty of Sympathy’. Kantian Review, 14, 3152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, Patrick (2014a) ‘Affective Normativity’. In Alix Cohen (ed.) Kant on Emotion and Value (New York: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 166190.Google Scholar
Frierson, Patrick (2014b) ‘Affects and Passions’. In Alix Cohen (ed.) Kant’s Lectures on Anthropology: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 94113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, Ido (2011) ‘Rational Feelings and Moral Agency’. Kantian Review, 16, 283308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (1993) Kant and the Experience of Freedom. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2000) Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2008) Knowledge, Reason and Taste: Kant’s Response to Hume. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2010) ‘Moral Feelings in the Metaphysics of Morals. In Lara Denis (ed.), Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 130152.Google Scholar
Herman, Barbara (1993) The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1996) Practical Philosophy. Trans. and ed. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1997) Lectures on Ethics. Ed. Peter Heath and J. B. Schneewind, trans. Peter Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2000) Critique of the Power of Judgment. Ed. Paul Guyer, trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2007) Anthropology, History, and Education, Ed. Gunter Zoller and Robert Louden trans. Mary Gregor, Paul Guyer, Robert Louden, Holly Wilson, Allen W. Wood, Gunter Zoller and Arnulf Zweig. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2012) Lectures on Anthropology. Ed. Allen W. Wood and Robert B. Louden, trans. Robert R. Clewis, Robert B. Louden, G. Felicitas Munzel and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papish, Laura (2007) ‘The Cultivation of Sensibility in Kant’s Moral Philosophy’. Kantian Review, 12, 128146.Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews (1989) ‘Kant’s Theory of Moral Sensibility: Respect for the Law and the Influence of Inclination’. Kant-Studien, 80, 284302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schapiro, Tamar (2009) ‘The Nature of Inclinations’. Ethics, 119, 229256.Google Scholar
Sherman, Nancy (1997) Making a Necessity of Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, Nancy (2014) ‘The Place of Emotions in Kantian Morality’. In Alix Cohen (ed.) Kant on Emotion and Value (New York: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 1132.Google Scholar
Sorensen, Kelly (2002) ‘Kant’s Taxonomy of Emotions’. Kantian Review, 6, 109128.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (2008) Kantian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Michael (2003) ‘The Motive of Duty and the Nature of the Emotions: Kantian Reflections on Moral Worth’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 33, 183202.Google Scholar
Weber, Michael (2007) ‘More on the Motive of Duty’. Journal of Ethics, 11, 6586.Google Scholar