No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
1 Mr. Taw Sein Ko has cited the record as if it gives also the double dates “Anno Buddhae 1708, Sakkarāj 526” = A.D. 1164, and “Anno Buddhae 1714, Sakkarāj 532” = A.D. 1170. But it does not do so. After the date A.B. 1601, Sakkarāj 419, it says (ibid., pp. 17, 151):— “At 107 years after that, in Sakkarāj 526”: and:āj 532”.