No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
page 575 note 1 See J.R.A.S., 1901, p. 579.Google Scholar The results of the researches of Professor Bühler and of Professor Kielhorn (whose death deprives us of one of the greatest of Sanskrit scholars) are not affected by later work (e.g., J.R.A.S., 1903, p. 186; 1904, p. 166). It is impossible to doubt that Vatsabhaṭṭi (A.D. 472) knew the Meghadūta and Ṛtusaṃhāra, and for reasons given by Bühler that Kālidāsa was not. a contemporary of Vatsabhaṭṭi.Google Scholar