No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
page 293 note 1 Among the features of the language of this work noted by Dr. Thomas is substitution of neuters for masculines, e.g. āsavāni, upāyāni, dēvālayāni, mantrāṇi. As he has elsewhere (JRAS., 1922, p. 82) maintained that a few precisely similar forms found in the dramas of “Bhāsa” are archaic Prakrit accusative masculines, this variety of view is interesting.