Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:48:19.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new species of Branchamphinome (Annelida: Amphinomidae) from the South-western Atlantic, with an emendation of the genus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2017

Rômulo Barroso ,
Natália Ranauro  and
Jerry D. Kudenov
Rômulo Barroso*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Marquês de São Vicente, 255, Gávea, 22451-900 Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil
Natália Ranauro
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Marquês de São Vicente, 255, Gávea, 22451-900 Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil
Jerry D. Kudenov
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alaska Anchorage, 3211 Providence Drive, Anchorage, Alaska 99508-4614, USA
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: R. Barroso, Departamento de Biologia, Pontifícia Universidade, Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Marquês de São Vicente, 255, Gávea, 22451-900 Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The genus Branchamphinome Hartman, 1967 is a moderately understood genus of Amphinomidae that differs morphologically from most other genera in the form of its chevron-shaped caruncle and the presence of branchiae from chaetiger 1. Branchamphinome is presently represented by two deep-water species: B. antarctica, described from the Southern Ocean and B. islandica, from Iceland. We describe a new species of Branchamphinome from shallow South-west Atlantic waters, coast of Brazil. The new taxon revealed the surprising presence of notopodial hooks in chaetiger 1, which was subsequently also found to be present in the lectotype of B. antarctica. Both the genus and Hartman's species are emended to include this morphological feature. Historically, the presence of notopodial hooks has long been considered a diagnostic character for the genus Paramphinome, particularly when distinguishing Paramphinome from Linopherus. Branchamphinome tropicalis sp. nov. was found inhabiting sand sediments at depths of 150 m and temperatures of 16–20°C. Branchamphinome tropicalis sp. nov. differs from its congeners by its characteristic and highly developed pigmentation pattern, shape of the caruncle, branchiae and disposition of prostomial eyes. This is the first report of this genus from shallow tropical waters.

Keywords

BiodiversityPolychaetaAmphinomidafirewormsBrazilCampos Basin
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 97 , Special Issue 5: Proceedings of the 12th International Polychaete Conference Amgueddfa Cymru - National Museum Wales Cardiff, Wales, UK, 1-5 August 2016 , August 2017 , pp. 835 - 842
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amoureux, L. (1982) Annélides Polychètes recueilliess sur la pente continentale de la Bretagne à l'Irlande, campagne 1973 de la Thalassa (suite et fin) avec la description de quatre espèces nouvelles pour la science. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 23, 29–51.Google Scholar
Barroso, R. and Paiva, P.C. (2008) A new deep sea species of Paramphinome (Polychaeta: Amphinomidae) from southern Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 88, 743–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barroso, R. and Paiva, P.C. (2011) A new deep-sea species of Chloeia (Polychaeta: Amphinomidae) from southern Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 91, 419–423.Google Scholar
Borda, E., Kudenov, J.D., Beinhold, C. and Rouse, G.W. (2012) Towards a revised Amphinomidae (Annelida: Amphinomida): description and affinities of a new genus and species from the Nile deep-sea fan, Mediterranean Sea. Zoologica Scripta 41, 307–325.Google Scholar
Borda, E., Kudenov, J.D., Chevaldonné, P., Blake, J.A., Desbruyères, D., Fabri, M-C., Hourdez, S., Pleijel, F., Shank, T.M., Wilson, N.G., Schulze, A. and Rouse, G.W. (2013) Cryptic species of Archinome (Annelida: Amphinomida) from vents and seeps. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 280, 20131876.Google ScholarPubMed
Borda, E., Yáñez-Rivera, B., Ochoa, G.M., Kudenov, J.D., Sanchez-Ortiz, C., Schulze, A. and Rouse, G.W. (2015) Revamping Amphinomidae (Annelida: Amphinomida), with the inclusion of Notopygos . Zoologica Scripta 44, 324–333.Google Scholar
Detinova, N. (1985) Polychaetous annelids of Rejkjanes Ridge (North Atlantic). Trudy Instituta Okeanologii P. P. Shirshova 20, 96–136. [In Russian with an English summary]Google Scholar
Hartman, O. (1967) Polychaetous annelids collected by the USNS Eltanin and Staten Island cruises, chiefly from Antarctic Seas. Allan Hancock Monographs in Marine Biology 2, 1–387.Google Scholar
Kudenov, J.D. (1993) Amphinomidae and Euphrosinidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) principally from Antarctica, the Southern Ocean, and subantarctic regions. Antarctic Research Series, Biology of the Antarctic Seas XXII 58, 93–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudenov, J.D. (1994) The order Amphinomida: a revision of the families (Annelida, Polychaeta). In Dauvin, J.C., Laubier, L. and Reish, D. J. (eds) Actes de la 4ème Conférence internationale des Polychètes, Angers, France. Mémoires du Muséum national d'histoire naturelle. Série A, Zoologie 162, 627–628.Google Scholar
Kudenov, J.D. (1995) Family Amphinomidae Lamarck, 1818. In Blake, J.A., Hilbig, B. and Scott, P.H. (eds) Taxonomic atlas of the benthic fauna of the Santa Maria basin and Western Santa Barbara channel. Santa Barbara, CA: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, pp. 1–377.Google Scholar
Nakamura, K., Tachikawa, Y., Kitamura, M., Ohno, O., Suganuma, M. and Uemura, D. (2008) Complanine, an inflammation inducing substance isolated from the marine fireworm Eurythoe complanata . Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry 6, 2058–2060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nygren, A., Eklöf, J. and Pleijel, F. (2010) Cryptic species of Notophyllum (Polychaeta: Phyllodocidae) in Scandinavian waters. Organism, Diversity and Evolution 10, 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, G. (2014) Amphinomidae Lamarck, 1818. In Read G. and Fauchald, K. (eds) World Polychaeta database. World Register of Marine Species, http://marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=960.Google Scholar
Yañez-Rivera, B. and Carrera-Parra, L.F. (2012) Reestablishment of Notopygos megalops McIntosh, description of N. caribea n. sp. from the Greater Caribbean and barcoding of ‘amphiamerican’ Notopygos species (Annelida, Amphinomidae). ZooKeys 223, 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar