Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T14:13:52.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental effects on the structure of polychaete feeding guilds on the beaches of Sepetiba Bay, south-eastern Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2012

Gustavo Mattos ,
Ricardo S. Cardoso  and
André Souza Dos Santos
Gustavo Mattos*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia Marinha, Departamento de Ecologia e Recursos Marinhos, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, CEP 22290-240, Brazil Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, CEP 21949-900, Brazil
Ricardo S. Cardoso
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia Marinha, Departamento de Ecologia e Recursos Marinhos, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, CEP 22290-240, Brazil
André Souza Dos Santos
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Invertebrados Paulo Young, Departamento de Sistemática e Ecologia, Centro de Ciências Exatas e da Natureza, Universidade Federal da Paraíba Campus I, CEP 58059-900, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: G. Mattos, Laboratório de Ecologia Marinha, Departamento de Ecologia e Recursos Marinhos, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, CEP 22290-240, Brazil email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several studies have been conducted to explain patterns of the abundance, richness and diversity of sandy-beach macrofauna; however, such analyses have ignored the overall functional structure of macrofauna communities. Few studies have examined polychaete feeding guilds on sandy beach environments. To examine the effects of environmental factors on polychaete feeding guilds on sandy beaches, 12 sandy beaches from five islands in Sepetiba Bay were sampled. A total of 24 polychaete morphospecies, grouped among 21 families, were identified in these sandy beaches. The polychaete species were classified into 10 feeding guilds, and the SDT guild (suspended-deposit feeders, discretely motile, with tentacles) was the most abundant feeding guild, with 34.2% of total number of organisms. The highest trophic importance index and index of trophic diversity values were recorded on the sheltered beaches. A canonical correspondence analysis showed that the exposure rate, beach length, and grain size of the beach sediment significantly affected the polychaete feeding guild distribution and abundance. We can conclude that sheltered beaches have a higher diversity of feeding guilds than exposed beaches and that the biological descriptors of the feeding guilds are directly associated with the grain size of the sediment.

Keywords

polychaetetrophic guildssandy beachesintertidal
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 93 , Issue 4 , June 2013 , pp. 973 - 980
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arruda, E.A., Domaneschi, O. and Amaral, A.C.Z. (2003) Mollusc feeding guilds on sandy beaches in São Paulo State, Brazil. Marine Biology 143, 691–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azevedo, M.C.C., Araújo, F.G., Cruz-Filho, A.G., Pessanha, A.L.M.Silva, M.A. and Guedes, A.P.P. (2007) Demersal fishes in a tropical bay in southeastern Brazil: partitioning the spatial, temporal and environmental components of ecological variation. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 75, 468–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergamino, L., Lercari, D. and Defeo, O. (2011) Food web structure of sandy beaches: temporal and spatial variation using stable isotope analysis. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 91, 536–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergamino, L., Muniz, P. and Defeo, O. (2009) Effects of a freshwater canal discharge on polychaete assemblages inhabiting an exposed sandy beach in Uruguay. Ecological Indicators 9, 584–587. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.07.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ter Braak, C.J.F. and Smilauer, P. (1998) CANOCO reference manual and user's guide to Canoco for Windows: software for canonical community ordination (Version 4). New York: Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, 351 pp.Google Scholar
Caetano, C.H.S., Cardoso, R.S., Braga, C.M. and Mattos, G. (2008) Marine molluscs from Flexeiras beach, Rio de Janeiro State, south-eastern Brazil. Strombus 15, 1–7.Google Scholar
Cardoso, R.S., Mattos, G., Caetano, C.H.S., Cabrini, T.M.B., Galhardo, L.B. and Meireis, F. (2012) Effects of environmental gradients on sandy beach macrofauna of a semi-enclosed bay. Marine Ecology 33, 106–116. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0485.2011.00457.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castanedo, N.D., Alcánta Solís-Weiss, V. and Barba, A.G. (in press) Distribution of polychaete feeding guilds in sedimentary environments of the Campeche Bank, southern Gulf of Mexico. Helgoland Marine Research. DOI 10.1007/s10152-011-0283-y.Google Scholar
Cheung, S.G., Lam, N.W.Y., Wu, R.S.S. and Shin, P.K.S. (2008) Spatio-temporal changes of marine macrobenthic community in sub-tropical waters upon recovery from eutrophication. II. Life-history traits and feeding guilds of polychaete community. Marine Pollution Bulletin 56, 297–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collet, L.C., Hutchings, P.A., Gibbs, P.J. and Collins, A.J. (1984) A comparative study of the macrobenthic fauna of Posidonia australis seagrass meadows in New South Wales. Aquatic Botany 18, 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colombini, I., Brilli, M., Fallaci, M., Gagnarli, E. and Chelazzi, L. (2011) Food webs of a sandy beach macroinvertebrate community using stable isotopes analysis. Acta Oecologica 37, 422–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damianidis, P. and Chintiroglou, C.C. (2000) Structure and functions of polychaetofauna living in Mytilus galloproincialis assemblages in Thermaikos Gulf (north Aegean Sea). Oceanologica Acta 23, 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defeo, O. and McLachlan, A. (2005) Patterns, processes and regulatory mechanisms in sandy beach macrofauna: a multi-scale analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 295, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defeo, O. and McLachlan, A. (2011) Coupling between macrofauna community structure and beach type: a deconstructive meta-analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 433, 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defeo, O. and Rueda, M. (2002) Spatial structure, sampling design and abundance estimates in sandy beach macroinfauna: some warnings and new perspectives. Marine Biology 140, 1215–1225.Google Scholar
Denadai, M.R. and Amaral, A.C.Z. (1999) A comparative study of intertidal molluscan communities in sandy beaches, São Sebastião Channel, São Paulo State, Brazil. Bulletin of Marine Science 65, 91–103.Google Scholar
Dexter, D.M. (1992) Sandy beach community structure: the role of exposure and latitude. Journal of Biogeography 19, 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emery, K.O. (1961) A simple method of measuring beach profiles. Limnology and Oceanography 6, 90–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauchald, K., Jumars, P.A., Johnson, B.A. and Boudreau, B.B. (1979) The diet of worms: a study of polychaete feeding guilds. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 17, 193–284.Google Scholar
Fitzhardinge, R. (1983) Comparisons of the invertebrate faunas colonizing soft sediments in two different habitats. Bulletin of Marine Science 33, 745–752.Google Scholar
Folk, R.L. and Ward, W.C. (1957) Brazos River bar, a study in significance of grain size parameters. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 27, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gambi, M.C. and Giangrande, A. (1985) Caratterizzazione e distribuzione delle categorie trofiche dei policheti nei fondi mobili del Golfo di Salerno. Oebalia 11, 223–240.Google Scholar
Gray, J.S. (1981) The ecology of marine sediments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heip, C., Vincx, M. and Vranken, G. (1985) The ecology of marine nematodes. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 23, 399–489.Google Scholar
Lercari, D., Bergamino, L. and Defeo, O. (2010) Trophic models in sandy beaches with contrasting morphodynamics: comparing ecosystem structure and biomass flow. Ecological Modelling 221, 2751–2759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longbottom, M.R. (1970) The distribution of Arenicola marina (L.) with particular reference to the effects of particle size and organic matter of the sediments. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 5, 138–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, D. and Leatham, W. (1981) Polychaete feeding guilds from Georges Bank, USA. Marine Biology 62, 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, A. (1980) The definition of sandy beaches in relation to exposure: simple rating system. South African Journal of Science 76, 137–138.Google Scholar
McLachlan, A., DeRuyck, A. and Hacking, N. (1996) Community structure on sandy beaches: patterns of richness and zonation in relation to tide range and latitude. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 69, 451–467.Google Scholar
McLachlan, A. and Dorvlo, A. (2005) Global patterns in sandy beach macrobenthic communities. Journal of Coastal Research 21, 674–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, A. and Brown, A.C. (2006) The ecology of sandy shores. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 373 pp.Google Scholar
McQuaid, C.D. and Dower, K.M. (1990) Enhancement of habitat heterogeneity and species richness on rocky shores inundated by sand. Oecologia 84, 142–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muniz, P. and Pires, A.M.S. (1999) Trophic structure of polychaetes in the São Sebastião Channel (southeastern Brazil). Marine Biology 134, 517–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagliosa, P.R. (2005) Another diet of worms: the applicability of polychaete feeding guilds as a useful conceptual framework and biological variable. Marine Ecology 26, 246–254. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0485.2005.00065.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paiva, P.C. (1993) Trophic structure of a shelf polychaete taxocoenosis in southern Brazil. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 35, 39–55.Google Scholar
Papageorgiou, N., Arvanitidis, C. and Eleftheriou, A. (2006) Multicausal environmental severity: a flexible framework for microtidal sandy beaches and the role of polychaetes as an indicator taxon. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 70, 643–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pessanha, A.L.M and Araújo, F.G. (2003) Spatial, temporal and diel variations of fish assemblages at two sandy beaches in the Sepetiba Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 57, 817–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porras, R., Bataller, J.V., Murgui, E. and Torregrosa, M.T. (1996) Trophic structure and community composition of polychaetes inhabiting some Sabellaria alveolata (L.) reefs along the Valencia Gulf coast, western Mediterranean. Marine Ecology 17, 583–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putman, R. and Wratten, S.D. (1984) Principles of ecology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 388 pp.Google Scholar
Root, R.B. (1967) The niche exploitation pattern of the blue gray gnatoeatcher. Ecological Monographs 37, 317–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, H. (1958) Benthic studies in Buzzards Bay: animal–sediment relationships. Limnology and Oceanography 3, 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summerson, H.C. and Peterson, C.H. (1984) Role of predation in organizing benthic communities of a temperate-zone seagrass bed. Marine Ecology 15, 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, G.F., Robertson, A.I. and Littlejohn, M.J. (1984) Invertebrate macrobenthos of the seagrass communities in Western Port, Victoria. Aquatic Botany 18, 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, R.M. (1982) The partitioning of secondary production among species in benthic communities. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 16, 1–17. DOI: 10.1016/0077-7579(82)90012-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Mattos supplementary material

Mattos supplementary material

Download Mattos supplementary material(File)
File 31.7 KB