Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:29:41.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE BESTVINA–BRADY CONSTRUCTION REVISITED: GEOMETRIC COMPUTATION OF [sum ]-INVARIANTS FOR RIGHT-ANGLED ARTIN GROUPS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1999

KAI-UWE BUX
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Room 233, 155 S, 1400 E, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84122-0090, USA; [email protected]
CARLOS GONZALEZ
Affiliation:
Fachbereich Mathematik, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, D-60054 Frankfurt-am-Main, Germany; [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The starting point of our investigation is the remarkable paper [2] in which Bestvina and Brady gave an example of an infinitely related group of type FP2. The result about right-angled Artin groups behind their example is best interpreted by means of the Bieri–Strebel–Neumann–Renz Σ-invariants.

For a group G the invariants Σn(G) and Σn(G, ℤ) are sets of non-trivial homomorphisms χ[ratio ]G→ℝ. They contain full information about finiteness properties of subgroups of G with abelian factor groups. The main result of [2] determines for the canonical homomorphism χ, taking each generator of the right-angled Artin group G to 1, the maximal n with χ ∈ Σn(G), respectively χ ∈ Σn(G, ℤ).

In [6] Meier, Meinert and VanWyk completed the picture by computing the full Σ-invariants of right-angled Artin groups using as well the result of Bestvina and Brady as algebraic techniques from Σ-theory. Here we offer a new account of their result which is totally geometric. In fact, we return to the Bestvina–Brady construction and simplify their argument considerably by bringing a more general notion of links into play. At the end of the first section we re-prove their main result. By re-computing the full Σ-invariants, we show in the second section that the simplification even adds some power to the method. The criterion we give provides new insight on the geometric nature of the ‘n-domination’ condition employed in [6].

Type
Notes and Papers
Copyright
The London Mathematical Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)