Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T09:18:13.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aging and Attentional Control: Examining the Roles of Mind-Wandering Propensity and Dispositional Mindfulness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2018

Stephanie Fountain-Zaragoza Open the ORCID record for Stephanie Fountain-Zaragoza [Opens in a new window] ,
Nicole A. Puccetti ,
Patrick Whitmoyer  and
Ruchika Shaurya Prakash
Stephanie Fountain-Zaragoza
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Nicole A. Puccetti
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Patrick Whitmoyer
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Ruchika Shaurya Prakash*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Ruchika Shaurya Prakash, Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 139 Psychology Building, 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: Aging is associated with declines in performance on certain laboratory tasks of attentional control. However, older adults tend to report greater mindful, present-moment attention and less mind-wandering (MW) than young adults. For older adults, high levels of these traits may be protective for attentional performance. This study examined age-related differences in global (i.e., full-task) and local (i.e., pre-MW) attentional control and explored the variance explained by MW and mindfulness. Methods: Cross-sectional comparisons were conducted on data from a previously reported sample of 75 older adults (ages, 60–75 years) and a new sample of 50 young adults (ages, 18–30 years). All participants completed a Go/No-Go task and a Continuous Performance Task with quasi-random MW probes. Results: There were few age-related differences in attentional control. Although MW was not associated with decrements in global performance, local performance measures revealed deleterious effects of MW, which were present across age groups. Older adults reported higher trait mindfulness and less MW than young adults, and these variables helped explain the lack of observed age-related differences in attentional control. Conclusions: Individual differences in dispositional mindfulness and MW propensity explain important variance in attentional performance across age. Increasing present-moment focus and reducing lapses in attention represent important targets for cognitive rehabilitation interventions. (JINS, 2018, 24, 876–888)

Keywords

AttentionCognitive agingOlder adultsOff-task thoughtIndividual differencesCross-sectional
Type
Regular Research
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 24 , Issue 8 , September 2018 , pp. 876 - 888
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, C.N., Langer, E.J., Newman, R.I., Chandler, H.M., & Davies, J.L. (1989). Transcendental meditation, mindfulness, and longevity: An experimental study with the elderly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 950.Google Scholar
Anicha, C.L., Ode, S., Moeller, S.K., & Robinson, M.D. (2012). Toward a cognitive view of trait mindfulness: Distinct cognitive skills predict its observing and nonreactivity facets. Journal of Personality, 80(2), 255–285.Google Scholar
Anstey, K.J., & Wood, J. (2011). Chronological age and age-related cognitive deficits are associated with an increase in multiple types of driving errors in late life. Neuropsychology, 25(5), 613.Google Scholar
Baer, R.A., Smith, G.T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45.Google Scholar
Beck, A.T., Steer, R.A., & Brown, G. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory II: Manual. San Antonio, TX, US: Psychological Corp.Google Scholar
Berardi, A., Parasuraman, R., & Haxby, J.V. (2001). Overall vigilance and sustained attention decrements in healthy aging. Experimental Aging Research, 27(1), 19–39.Google Scholar
Brache, K., Scialfa, C., & Hudson, C. (2010). Aging and vigilance: Who has the inhibition deficit? Experimental Aging Research, 36(2), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610731003613425.Google Scholar
Braver, T.S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 106–113.Google Scholar
Braver, T.S., Barch, D.M., Keys, B.A., Carter, C.S., Cohen, J.D., Kaye, J.A., & Jagust, W. J. (2001). Context processing in older adults: evidence for a theory relating cognitive control to neurobiology in healthy aging. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 746.Google Scholar
Braver, T.S., Gray, J.R., & Burgess, G.C. (2007). Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In A.R. Conway, J. Christopher, M.J. Kane, A. Miyake & J.N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 76–106). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Braver, T.S., Satpute, A.B., Rush, B.K., Racine, C.A., & Barch, D.M. (2005). Context processing and context maintenance in healthy aging and early stage dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Psychology and Aging, 20(1), 33.Google Scholar
Brown, K.W., & Ryan, R.M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822.Google Scholar
Bugg, J.M. (2014). Evidence for the sparing of reactive cognitive control with age. Psychology and Aging, 29(1), 115.Google Scholar
Carriere, J.S., Cheyne, J.A., Solman, G.J., & Smilek, D. (2010). Age trends for failures of sustained attention. Psychology and Aging, 25(3), 569.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L.L. (1992). Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 7(3), 331–338.Google Scholar
Cheyne, J.A., Carriere, J.S., & Smilek, D. (2006). Absent-mindedness: Lapses of conscious awareness and everyday cognitive failures. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(3), 578–592.Google Scholar
Cheyne, J.A., Solman, G.J., Carriere, J.S., & Smilek, D. (2009). Anatomy of an error: A bidirectional state model of task engagement/disengagement and attention-related errors. Cognition, 111(1), 98–113.Google Scholar
Christensen, H., Mackinnon, A.J., Korten, A.E., Jorm, A.F., Henderson, A.S., & Jacomb, P. (1999). Dispersion in cognitive ability as a function of age: A longitudinal study of an elderly community sample. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 6(3), 214–228.Google Scholar
Deaton, J.E., & Parasuraman, R. (1993). Sensory and cognitive vigilance: Effects of age on performance and subjective workload. Human Performance, 6(1), 71–97.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, G. (2011). Is mindfulness present-centred and non-judgmental? A discussion of the cognitive dimensions of mindfulness. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(01), 41–54.Google Scholar
Fiocco, A.J., & Mallya, S. (2015). The importance of cultivating mindfulness for cognitive and emotional well-being in late life. Journal of Evidence-Based Complementary & Alternative Medicine, 20(1), 35–40.Google Scholar
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198.Google Scholar
Fountain-Zaragoza, S., Londerée, A., Whitmoyer, P., & Prakash, R.S. (2016). Dispositional mindfulness and the wandering mind: Implications for attentional control in older adults. Consciousness and Cognition, 44, 193–204.Google Scholar
Frank, D.J., Nara, B., Zavagnin, M., Touron, D.R., & Kane, M.J. (2015). Validating older adults’ reports of less mind-wandering: An examination of eye movements and dispositional influences. Psychology and Aging, 30(2), 266–278.Google Scholar
Giambra, L.M. (1977). Adult male daydreaming across the life span: A replication, further analyses, and tentative norms based upon retrospective reports. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 8(3), 197–228.Google Scholar
Giambra, L.M. (1979). Sex differences in daydreaming and related mental activity from the late teens to the early nineties. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 10(1), 1–34.Google Scholar
Giambra, L.M. (1989). Task-unrelated thought frequency as a function of age: A laboratory study. Psychology and Aging, 4(2), 136–143.Google Scholar
Goh, J.O., An, Y., & Resnick, S.M. (2012). Differential trajectories of age-related changes in components of executive and memory processes. Psychology and Aging, 27(3), 707.Google Scholar
Goh, J.O., Beason-Held, L.L., An, Y., Kraut, M.A., & Resnick, S.M. (2013). Frontal function and executive processing in older adults: Process and region specific age-related longitudinal functional changes. NeuroImage, 69, 43–50.Google Scholar
Grandjean, J., & Collette, F. (2011). Influence of response prepotency strength, general working memory resources, and specific working memory load on the ability to inhibit predominant responses: A comparison of young and elderly participants. Brain and Cognition, 77(2), 237–247.Google Scholar
Greenwood, P.M., & Parasuraman, R. (2004). The scaling of spatial attention in visual search and its modification in healthy aging. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(1), 3–22.Google Scholar
Greenwood, P.M., Parasuraman, R., & Haxby, J.V. (1993). Changes in visuospatial attention over the adult lifespan. Neuropsychologia, 31(5), 471–485.Google Scholar
Gyurkovics, M., Balota, D. A., & Jackson, J. D. (2017). Mind-wandering in healthy aging and early stage Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 32(1), 89–101.Google Scholar
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R.T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 22, 193–225.Google Scholar
Hayes, A.F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/ public/process2012.pdf Google Scholar
Hayes, A.F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hölzel, B.K., Lazar, S.W., Gard, T., Schuman-Olivier, Z., Vago, D.R., & Ott, U. (2011). How does mindfulness meditation work? Proposing mechanisms of action from a conceptual and neural perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(6), 537–559.Google Scholar
Hultsch, D.F., MacDonald, S.W.S., & Dixon, R.A. (2002). Variability in reaction time performance of younger and older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57, P101–P115.Google Scholar
Ishihara, S. (2010). Ishihara's tests for colour deficiency 2010: 14 plate book concise edition. Atlanta, GA: Graham‐Field Health Products, Inc.Google Scholar
Jackson, J.D., & Balota, D.A. (2012). Mind-wandering in younger and older adults: Converging evidence from the Sustained Attention to Response Task and reading for comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 27(1), 106.Google Scholar
Jackson, J.D., Balota, D.A., Duchek, J.M., & Head, D. (2012). White matter integrity and reaction time intraindividual variability in healthy aging and early-stage Alzheimer disease. Neuropsychologia, 50(3), 357–366.Google Scholar
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156.Google Scholar
Krawietz, S.A., Tamplin, A.K., & Radvansky, G.A. (2012). Aging and mind wandering during text comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 27(4), 951.Google Scholar
Kryla-Lighthall, N., & Mather, M. (2009). The role of cognitive control in older adults’ emotional well-being. In V.L. Bengston, D. Gans, N.M. Putney, & M. Silverstin (Eds.), Handbook of Theories of Aging (pp. 323–344). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Lavie, N. (2010). Attention, distraction, and cognitive control under load. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(3), 143–148.Google Scholar
Lenze, E.J., Hickman, S., Hershey, T., Wendleton, L., Ly, K., Dixon, D., & Wetherell, J.L. (2014). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for older adults with worry symptoms and co-occurring cognitive dysfunction. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 29(10), 991–1000.Google Scholar
Maillet, D., & Rajah, M.N. (2013). Age-related changes in frequency of mind-wandering and task-related interferences during memory encoding and their impact on retrieval. Memory, 21(7), 818–831.Google Scholar
McAvinue, L.P., Habekost, T., Johnson, K.A., Kyllingsbæk, S., Vangkilde, S., Bundesen, C., & Robertson, I.H. (2012). Sustained attention, attentional selectivity, and attentional capacity across the lifespan. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(8), 1570–1582.Google Scholar
McKnight, A.J., & McKnight, A.S. (1999). Multivariate analysis of age-related driver ability and performance deficits. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 31(5), 445–454.Google Scholar
McVay, J.C., Meier, M.E., Touron, D.R., & Kane, M.J. (2013). Aging ebbs the flow of thought: Adult age differences in mind wandering, executive control, and self-evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 142(1), 136–147.Google Scholar
Morone, N.E., Greco, C.M., & Weiner, D.K. (2008). Mindfulness meditation for the treatment of chronic low back pain in older adults: A randomized controlled pilot study. Pain, 134(3), 310–319.Google Scholar
Moynihan, J.A., Chapman, B.P., Klorman, R., Krasner, M.S., Duberstein, P.R., Brown, K.W., & Talbot, N.L. (2013). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for older adults: Effects on executive function, frontal alpha asymmetry and immune function. Neuropsychobiology, 68, 34–43.Google Scholar
Mrazek, M.D., Franklin, M.S., Phillips, D.T., Baird, B., & Schooler, J.W. (2013). Mindfulness training improves working memory capacity and GRE performance while reducing mind wandering. Psychological Science, 24(5), 776–781.Google Scholar
Mrazek, M.D., Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J.W. (2012). Mindfulness and mind-wandering: Finding convergence through opposing constructs. Emotion, 12(3), 442.Google Scholar
Osborne, J.W., & Overbay, A. (2004). The power of outliers (and why researchers should always check for them). Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(6), 1–12.Google Scholar
Park, D.C. (1999). Aging and the controlled and automatic processing of medical information and medical intentions. In D.C. Park, R.W. Morrell & K. Shifren (Eds.), Processing of medical information in aging patients: Cognitive and human factors perspectives (pp. 3–22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Park, D.C., Lautenschlager, G., Hedden, T., Davidson, N.S., Smith, A.D., & Smith, P.K. (2002). Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 17(2), 299.Google Scholar
Paxton, J.L., Barch, D.M., Racine, C.A., & Braver, T.S. (2008). Cognitive control, goal maintenance, and prefrontal function in healthy aging. Cerebral Cortex, 18(5), 1010–1028.Google Scholar
Paxton, J.L., Barch, D.M., Storandt, M., & Braver, T.S. (2006). Effects of environmental support and strategy training on older adults’ use of context. Psychology and Aging, 21(3), 499.Google Scholar
Peebles, D., & Bothell, D. (2004). Modelling performance in the sustained attention to response task. In C.D. Schunn, M.C.Lovett, C. Lebiere, & P. Munro (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth international conference on cognitive modeling (pp. 231–236). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Petersen, S.E., & Posner, M.I. (2012). The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35, 73.Google Scholar
Prakash, R.S., Hussain, M.A., & Schirda, B. (2015). The role of emotion regulation and cognitive control in the association between mindfulness disposition and stress. Psychology and Aging, 30(1), 160.Google Scholar
Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731.Google Scholar
Rabbitt, P. (1979). How old and young subjects monitor and control responses for accuracy and speed. British Journal of Psychology, 70(2), 305–311.Google Scholar
Randall, J.G., Oswald, F.L., & Beier, M.E. (2014). Mind-wandering, cognition, and performance: A theory-driven meta-analysis of attention regulation. Psychological bulletin, 140(6), 1411.Google Scholar
Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85(2), 59.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T.A. (1979). Adult age and the speed-accuracy trade-off. Ergonomics, 22(7), 811–821.Google Scholar
Schirda, B., Valentine, T.R., Aldao, A., & Prakash, R.S. (2016). Age-related differences in emotion regulation strategies: Examining the role of contextual factors. Developmental Psychology, 52(9), 1370.Google Scholar
Seli, P., Cheyne, J.A., & Smilek, D. (2012). Attention failures versus misplaced diligence: Separating attention lapses from speed–accuracy trade-offs. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(1), 277–291.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S.S., & Wilk, M.B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3/4), 591–611.Google Scholar
Smallwood, J., Nind, L., & O’Connor, R.C. (2009). When is your head at? An exploration of the factors associated with the temporal focus of the wandering mind. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(1), 118–125.Google Scholar
Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J.W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132(6), 946–958.Google Scholar
Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J.W. (2015). The science of mind wandering: Empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 487–518.Google Scholar
Starns, J.J., & Ratcliff, R. (2010). The effects of aging on the speed–accuracy compromise: Boundary optimality in the diffusion model. Psychology and Aging, 25(2), 377.Google Scholar
Staub, B., Doignon-Camus, N., Bacon, É., & Bonnefond, A. (2014a). Investigating sustained attention ability in the elderly by using two different approaches: Inhibiting ongoing behavior versus responding on rare occasions. Acta Psychologica, 146, 51–57.Google Scholar
Staub, B., Doignon-Camus, N., Bacon, É., & Bonnefond, A. (2014b). The effects of aging on sustained attention ability: An ERP study. Psychology and Aging, 29(3), 684.Google Scholar
Stawarczyk, D., Majerus, S., Catale, C., & D’Argembeau, A. (2014). Relationships between mind-wandering and attentional control abilities in young adults and adolescents. Acta Psychologica, 148, 25–36.Google Scholar
Tse, C.-S., Balota, D.A., Yap, M.J., Duchek, J.M., & McCabe, D.P. (2010). Effects of healthy aging and early-stage dementia of the Alzheimer’s type on components of response time distributions in three attention tasks. Neuropsychology, 24(3), 300–315.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (1988). MRC Psycholinguistic Database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20(1), 6–10.Google Scholar
Whitmoyer, P., Fountain-Zaragoza, S., Andridge, R., Bredemeier, K., Londeree, A., Zabludovsky, L., & Prakash, R.S. (under review). Mindfulness training and attentional control in older adults: Results of a single-blind, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial.Google Scholar
Yesavage, J.A., Brink, T.L., Rose, T.L., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M., & Leirer, V.O. (1982). Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17(1), 37–49.Google Scholar
Zavagnin, M., Borella, E., & De Beni, R. (2014). When the mind wanders: Age-related differences between young and older adults. Acta Psychologica, 145, 54–64.Google Scholar
Zwahr, M.D., Park, D.C., Eaton, T.A., & Larson, E.J. (1997). Implementation of the patient self-determination act: A comparison of nursing homes to hospitals. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 16(2), 190–207.Google Scholar
Zwahr, M.D., Park, D.C., & Shifren, K. (1999). Judgments about estrogen replacement therapy: The role of age, cognitive abilities, and beliefs. Psychology and Aging, 14(2), 179–191.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Fountain-Zaragoza et al. supplementary material

Fountain-Zaragoza et al. supplementary material 1

Download Fountain-Zaragoza et al. supplementary material(File)
File 79.8 KB