Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:15:58.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diagrammatically reducible complexes and Haken manifolds

Part of: Special aspects of infinite or finite groups Topological manifolds Low-dimensional topology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

J. M Corson  and
B. Trace
B. Trace
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics University of AlabamaBox 870350 Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0350USA e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We show that diagrammatically reducible two-complexes are characterized by the property: every finity subconmplex of the universal cover collapses to a one-complex. We use this to show that a compact orientable three-manifold with nonempty boundary is Haken if and only if it has a diagrammatically reducible spine. We also formulate an nanlogue of diagrammatic reducibility for higher dimensional complexes. Like Haken three-manifolds, we observe that if n ≥ 4 and M is compact connected n-dimensional manifold with a traingulation, or a spine, satisfying this property, then the interior of the universal cover of M is homeomorphic to Euclidean n-space.

Keywords

Diagrammatically reducibleManifoldHaken manifoldSpinecollapsecovering spacetwo-complex

MSC classification

Secondary: 57M20: Two-dimensional complexes 57N10: Topology of general $3$-manifolds 20F06: Cancellation theory; application of van Kampen diagrams
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 69 , Issue 1 , August 2000 , pp. 116 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2000

References

[Bk]Brick, S. G., ‘A note on coverings and Kervaire complexes’, Bull. Austral Math. Soc. 46 (1992), 1–21.Google Scholar
[Bn]Brown, M., ‘The monotone union of open n-cells is an open n-cell’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 12 (1961), 812–814.Google Scholar
[Ch]Chillingworth, D. R. J., ’, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 63 (1967), 353–357,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correction: Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 88 (1980), 307–310.Google Scholar
[CCH]Chiswell, I. M., Collins, D. J. and Huebschmann, J., ‘Aspherical group presentations’, Math. Z. 178 (1981), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[CTI]Corson, J. M. and Trace, B., ‘Geometry and algebra of nonspherical 2-complexes’, J. London Math. Soc. 54 (1996), 180–198.Google Scholar
[CT2]Corson, J. M. and Trace, B., ‘The 6-property for simplicial complexes and a combinatorial Cartan-Hadamard Theorem for manifolds’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 126 (1998), 917–924.Google Scholar
[Ge1]Gersten, S. M., ‘Reducible diagrams and equations over groups’, in: Essaya in groups theory (ed. Gersten, S. M.), Publ. Math. Sci. Res. Inst. 8 (Springer, New York, 1987) pp. 15–73.Google Scholar
[Ge2]Gersten, S. M., ‘Branched coverings of 2-complexes and diagrammatic reducibility’, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 303 (1987), 689–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[He]Hempet, J., 3-manifolds, Annals of Mathematics Studies 86 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1976).Google Scholar
[LS]Lyndon, R. C. and Schupp, P. E., Combinatorial group theory, Ergeb. Math. 89 (Springer, New York, 1977).Google Scholar
[RS]Rourke, C. P. and Sanderson, B. J., Introduction to piecewise-linear topology, Ergeb. Math. 69 (Springer, New York, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Ru]Rushing, T. B., Topological embeddings, Pure Appl. Math. 52 (Academic Press, New York and London, 1973).Google Scholar
[Si]Sieradski, A. J., ‘A coloring test for asphericity’, Quart. J. Math. Oxford 34 (1983), 97–106.Google Scholar