Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:19:34.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Partisanship and tax competition in the American states

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2015

John C. Davis  and
Sean Nicholson-Crotty
John C. Davis
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Arkansas at Monticello, USA E-mail: [email protected]
Sean Nicholson-Crotty
Affiliation:
School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, USA E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Existing research identifies partisan differences in taxing choices made by state governments. Research has also found that, even when controlling for intrastate characteristics such as party, jurisdictions respond to the taxing decisions of their neighbours, particularly when citizens can easily cross-border shop. These studies treat political and competitive factors as independent influences on taxes. We suggest they are more likely to interact in taxing decisions. We argue that the political costs of cross-border shopping are higher for Republicans, and the threat of it should have a greater negative impact on taxes when that party controls major state policy-making institutions. Our analyses of state cigarette taxes between 1980 and 2011 confirm that a higher threat of cross-border shopping has a larger negative impact on taxes under Republican governors. We conclude that, by missing the interaction between partisanship and the threat of fiscal mobility, previous work misestimates key influences on tax competition.

Keywords

cross-border shoppingpartisanshipstate politicstax competition
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 437 - 456
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdel-Rahman, H. M. (1990) Agglomeration Economies, Types, and Sizes of Cities. Journal of Urban Economics 27: 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiura, H. and Ogawa, H. (2013) Unit Tax Versus Valorem Tax: A Tax Competition Model with Cross-Border Shopping. Journal of Public Economics 105: 30–38.Google Scholar
Alt, J. E. and Lowry, R. (2000) A Dynamic Model of State Budget Outcomes Under Divided Partisan Government. Journal of Politics 62: 1035–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aston, G. (1989) Warning: Cigarette Dealers Call Tax Hazardous. St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 22 May.Google Scholar
Bailey, M. A. and Rom, M. C. (2004) A Wider Race? Interstate Competition Across Health and Welfare Programs. Journal of Politics 66(2): 326–347.Google Scholar
Baybeck, B., Berry, W. D. and Siegel, D. A. (2011) A Strategic Theory of Policy Diffusion Via Intergovernmental Competition. Journal of Politics 73(1): 232–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berch, N. (1995) Explaining Changes in Tax Incidence in the States. Political Research Quarterly 48: 629–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, F. S. and Berry, W. D. (1992) Tax Innovation in the States: Capitalizing on Political Opportunity. American Journal of Political Science 36: 715–742.Google Scholar
Berry, W. D. and Baybeck, B. (2005) Using Geographic Information Systems to Study Interstate Competition. American Political Science Review 99(4): 505–519.Google Scholar
Besley, T. and Case, A. (1995) Incumbent Behavior: Vote-Seeking, Tax-Setting, and Yardstick Competition. American Economic Review 85: 25–45.Google Scholar
Beyle, T. (1983) Governors. In Gray V., Jacobs H. and Vines K. (eds.), Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis. Canada: Little, Brown and Company, 192–229.Google Scholar
Boehmke, F. J. and Witmer, R. (2004) Disentangling Diffusion: The Effects of Social Learning and Economic Competition on State Policy Innovation and Expansion. Political Research Quarterly 57(1): 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burden, B. C. and Sanberg, J. N. R. (2003) Budget Rhetoric in Presidential Campaigns from 1952 to 2000. Political Behavior 25: 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, G. and Piper, B. (2012) Strategic Fiscal Interdependence: County and Municipal Adoptions of Local Option Sales Taxes. National Tax Journal 65: 387–416.Google Scholar
Burge, G. and Rogers, C. (2011) Local Option Sales Taxes and Consumer Spending Patterns: Fiscal Interdependence Under Multi-Tiered Local Taxation. Regional Science and Urban Economics 41: 46–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, B. (2001) Has Leviathan Been Bound? A Theory of Imperfectly Constrained Government with Evidence from the States. Southern Economic Journal 67: 825–847.Google Scholar
Case, A. (1993) Interstate Tax Competition After TRA86. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 12: 136–148.Google Scholar
Center for Responsive Politics (2013) US Chamber of Commerce, http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.php?id=D000019798&cycle=A (accessed 15 November 2013).Google Scholar
Christansen, V. (1994) Cross-Border Shopping and the Optimum Commodity Tax in a Competitive and a Monopoly Market. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 96: 329–341.Google Scholar
Davies, D. G. (1986) United States Taxes and Tax Policy . New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devereux, M. P., Lockwood, B. and Redoano, M. (2006) Horizontal and Vertical Indirect Tax Competition: Theory and Some Evidence from the USA. Journal of Public Economics 91: 459–479.Google Scholar
Eadington, W. R. (1999) The Economics of Casino Gaming. Journal of Economic Perspectives 13: 173–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federation of Tax Administrators (2011) The Tax Burden on Tobacco. Volume 46. Federation of Tax Administrators, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
Fotheringham, A. S. (1985) Spatial Competition and Agglomeration in Urban Modeling. Environment and Planning A 17: 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossback, L. J., Nicholson-Crotty, S. and Peterson, D. A. (2004) Ideology and Learning in Policy Diffusion. American Politics Research 32(5): 521–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, S. B. (1983) The Politics of Taxation: Revenue Without Representation. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kone, S. L. and Winters, R. F. (1993) Taxes and Voting: Electoral Retribution in the American States. Journal of Politics 55: 22–40.Google Scholar
Ladd, H. F. (1992) Mimicking of Local Tax Burden Among Neighboring Counties. Public Finance Quarterly 20: 450–467.Google Scholar
Leal, A., Lopez-Laborda, J. and Rodrigo, F. (2009) Prices, Taxes and Automotive Fuel Cross-Border Shopping. Energy Economics 31: 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leal, A., Lopez-Laborda, J. and Rodrigo, F. (2010) Cross-Border Shopping: A Survey. International Advances in Economic Research 16: 135–148.Google Scholar
Long, R. (2013) Plans to Hike Tobacco Taxes Could Cause Shoppers to Go Elsewhere, Storeowners Say. Bangor Daily News, 6 May. http://bangordailynews.com/2013/05/06/news/state/public-health-advocates-push-for-higher-tobacco-taxes-in-maine/ (accessed 3 July 2013).Google Scholar
Lowry, R. C., Alt, J. E. and Ferree, K. E. (1998) Fiscal Policy Outcomes and Electoral Accountability in American States. American Political Science Review 92: 759–774.Google Scholar
Luke, D. A. and Krauss, M. (2004) Where There’s Smoke There’s Money: Tobacco Industry Campaign Contributions and U.S. Congressional Voting. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 27: 363–372.Google Scholar
Mikesell, J. L. (1978) Election Periods and State Tax Policy Cycles. Public Choice 33: 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikesell, J. L. (2007) Changing State Fiscal Capacity and Tax Effort in an Era of Devolving Government, 1981–2003. Publius 37: 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, M. A. (2002) Using Excise Taxes to Finance State Government: Do Neighboring State Taxation Policy and Cross-Border Markers Matter? Journal of Regional Science 42: 731–752.Google Scholar
Oppewal, H. and Holyoake, B. (2004) Bundling and Retail Agglomeration Effects on Shopping Behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 11: 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poterba, J. M. (1994) State Responses to Fiscal Crises: The Effects of Budgetary Institutions and Politics. Journal of Political Economy 102: 799–821.Google Scholar
Poterba, J. M. (1996) Budget Institutions and Fiscal Policy in the U.S. States. American Economic Review 86: 395–400.Google Scholar
Reed, R. W. (2006) Democrats, Republicans, and Taxes: Evidence that Political Parties Matter. Journal of Public Economics 90: 725–750.Google Scholar
Revelli, F. (2002) Local Taxes, National Politics, and Spatial Interactions in English District Election Results. European Journal of Political Economy 18: 281–299.Google Scholar
Rork, J. C. (2003) Coveting Thy Neighbors’ Taxation. National Tax Journal 56: 775–787.Google Scholar
Stults, B. G. and Winters, R. F. (2000) The Political Economy of Taxes and the Vote. Presented at the Annual Conference on State Politics and Policy, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 26–27 May 2002.Google Scholar
Tiebout, C. (1956) A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64: 416–424.Google Scholar
Trask, M. (2012) Supporters of Missouri’s Prop. B Not Ready to Try Again. Missouri Lawyers Media, 8 November.Google Scholar
Volden, C. (2006) States as Policy Laboratories: Emulating Success in the Children’s Health Insurance Program. American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 294–312.Google Scholar
Walker, J. L. (1969) The Diffusion of Innovations Among the American States. American Political Science Review 63(3): 880–899.Google Scholar
Winters, R. F. (1996) The Politics of Taxing and Spending. In Gray V. and Jacob H. (eds.), Politics in the American States, 6th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 304–348.Google Scholar