Article contents
Uppermost Cambrian slope deposits at Highgate Gorge, Vermont: a minor miscorrelation with major consequences for conodont- and trilobite-based chronocorrelation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 May 2016
Abstract
Uppermost Cambrian and lowest Ordovician slope deposits in Highgate Gorge, northwestern Vermont, yield a succession of conodont faunas (and a few associated trilobite species) similar to that observed in coeval North American carbonate-platform sequences. Decimeter-scale sampling of a 15-m-interval in two sections comprising thin-bedded limestone–shale rhythmites alternating with thick-bedded debris flow conglomerates yielded 60 trilobite specimens and more than 5,000 conodont elements from 48 productive horizons. The new biostratigraphic control does not support earlier claims that the lowest occurrence of Cordylodus proavus in the Gorge Formation and presumably in other slope sequences is significantly older than the base of the C. proavus Zone in platform deposits; rather, it demonstrates the isochronous persistence of this boundary across the North American (Laurentian) shelf margin into Iapetan slope deposits. The common occurrence of the deep, cool-water conodont Eoconodontus alisonae and the agnostoid trilobite Lotagnostus hedini in the Eoconodontus Zone at Highgate Gorge makes it possible to extend the correlation even farther from the Laurentian platform into uppermost Cambrian strata in Kazakhstan and China. This new information greatly strengthens arguments in favor of using this zonal boundary for defining the international boundary between the Cambrian and Ordovician Systems.
In earlier studies of Highgate Gorge strata, composite treatment of biostratigraphic data from similar but non-correlative intervals (Zones 2 and 3) in two sections created an illusion of significant stratigraphic overlap of C. proavus with older faunas and direct association of some trilobite species for which overlap has never been established. Composite treatment of data from Zones 2 and 3 under designations such as “main zone’ or “upper zone’ should be discontinued and species that have been reported as occurring together in the “main zone’ should not be assumed (on the basis of that association alone) to have come from the same stratigraphic level.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Paleontological Society
References
- 5
- Cited by