Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:29:27.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Demosponges and hexactinellid sponges from the Lower Devonian Ross Formation of west-central Tennessee

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

J. Keith Rigby  and
Craig R. Clement
J. Keith Rigby
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602-4660
Craig R. Clement
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 37919
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A fauna of eight taxa of demosponges and hexactinellid sponges has been collected from the Lower Devonian (Lochkovian) Ross Formation, largely out of the upper Birdsong Shale Member in Benton, Decatur, and Perry Counties in west-central Tennessee. The Upper Birdsong Shale (“bryozoan zone”) in which the sponges are most common appears to have been deposited below normal wave base in a quiet marine environment, and represents a terrigenous clastic sediment influx onto a carbonate shelf that had existed in the area from at least the middle Silurian. Benton Quarry in Benton County was the most productive locality for fossil sponges.

The new demosponge genera and species Ginkgospongia foliata and Coniculospongia radiata occur with the new species Haplistion lobatum and skeletal mats of fine spicules, along with moderately rare specimens of Hindia sphaeroidalis Duncan. The new hexactinellid genus and species Stiodermiella amanita and Stiodermiella tetragona are characterized by peculiar ornamented papillose, swollen spicules that produce a massive, armored layer on the upper part of the sponge. The latter are associated with the new hexactinellid species Twenhofelella bulbulus, which has relatively normal-appearing hexactines, and with an indeterminate hexactinellid genus, which has spinose hexactines in irregular orientation in a small, platelike fragment. Root tufts of probable hexactine origin also occur.

Swollen spicules in Stiodermiella are reminiscent of swollen spicules in the family Stiodermatidae Finks, largely from the Permian of western Texas, but elements of the family are also known from Lower Carboniferous to Permian rocks in Europe and North America.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 69 , Issue 2 , March 1995 , pp. 211 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, S. F. 1985. Early Devonian continental positions and climate. A framework for paleophytogeography, p. 93–127. In Tiffney, B. H. (ed.), Geological Factors and the Evolution of Plants. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Barrick, J. E. 1983. Wenlockian (Silurian) conodont biostratigraphy, biofacies, and carbonate lithologies, Wayne Formation, central Tennessee. Journal of Paleontology, 57:208–239.Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1865. Palaeozoic fossils, containing descriptions and figures of new or little known species of organic remains from Silurian rocks. Geology of Canada, Volume 1, Geological Survey of Canada, 426 p.Google Scholar
Broadhead, T. W., Cappaccioli, D. A., McComb, R. M., Reid, S. R., and Walker, K. R. 1989. Late Silurian and Early Devonian marine sedimentation near the southern margin of the North American craton, p. 197–207. In McMillan, N. J., Embry, A. F., and Glass, D. J. (eds.), Devonian of the World, Volume II, Sedimentation. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 14.Google Scholar
Cappaccioli, D. A. 1987. Biostratigraphy, petrology, and paleodepositional environments of the Ross Formation, Upper Silurian-Lower Devonian, west-central Tennessee. Unpubl. , University of Texas, Austin, 125 p.Google Scholar
Carter, H. J. 1878. Mr. James Thomson's fossil sponges from the Carboniferous system of the south-west of Scotland. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 5, 1:128–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, H. J. 1880. On fossil sponge spicules from the Carboniferous strata of Ben Bulben near Sligo. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 5, 6:209–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clement, C. R. 1989. Echinoderm faunas of the Decatur Limestone and Ross Formation (Upper Silurian to Lower Devonian) of west-central Tennessee. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 365 p.Google Scholar
Dunbar, C. O. 1918. Stratigraphy and correlation of the Devonian of western Tennessee. American Journal of Science, Series 4, 46:732–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, C. O. 1919. Stratigraphy and correlation of the Devonian of western Tennessee. Tennessee State Geological Survey Bulletin, 21:1–127.Google Scholar
Duncan, P. M. 1879. On some spheroidal lithistid Spongida from the Upper Silurian formation of New Brunswick. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 5, 4:84–91.Google Scholar
Dunikowski, E. 1884. Ueber Permo-Carbon Schwämme von Spitzbergen. Handlingar Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps—Akademiens, Series 4, 21:1–18.Google Scholar
Finks, R. M. 1960. Late Paleozoic sponge faunas of the Texas region. The siliceous sponges. American Museum of Natural History Bulletin, 120, Article 1, 160 p.Google Scholar
Gerth, H. 1929. Die Spongien aus dem Perm von Timor. Paläontologie von Timor, XVI: Lieferung, Abhandlungen XXVII, 35 p.Google Scholar
Gibson, M. A. 1988. Paleogeography, depositional environments, paleoecology, and biotic interactions in Rockhouse Limestone and Birdsong Shale Members of the Ross Formation (Lower Devonian), western Tennessee. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 423 p.Google Scholar
Hinde, G. J. 1883. Catalogue of Fossil Sponges of the British Museum (Natural History). London, 248 p.Google Scholar
Hinde, G. J. 1887. A monograph of the British fossil sponges. Palaeontological Society of London, Part I, 40:1–92.Google Scholar
Hinde, G. J. 1888. A monograph of the British fossil sponges. Palaeontological Society of London, Part II, 41:93–188.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. P. 1814. Suite de Polypieres empâtés: Téthie, Alcyon, Géodie, Botrylle, et Polycycle. Mémoire Muséum National d'Histoire naturelle (Paris), 1:69–80, 162–168, 331–334.Google Scholar
Laubenfels, M. W. de. 1955. Porifera, p. E21–E112. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part E. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Lendenfeld, R. von. 1887. On the systematic position and classification of the sponges. Zoological Society of London, Proceedings, 1886:558–667.Google Scholar
McComb, R. 1987. Petrology, paleodepositional environments, biostratigraphy, and paleoecology of the Decatur and Rockhouse Limestones (Upper Silurian–Lower Devonian). Unpubl. , University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 309 p.Google Scholar
McComb, R., and Broadhead, T. W. 1980. Silurian–Devonian correlation in eastern United States. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 12:479.Google Scholar
Miller, S. A. 1889. Class Porifera, p. 152–167. In Miller, S. A., North American Geology and Paleontology. Cincinnati (published by the author).Google Scholar
Rauff, H. 1893. Palaeospongiologie. Palaeontographica, 40:1–232.Google Scholar
Rauff, H. 1894. Palaeospongiologie. Palaeontographica, 41:233–346.Google Scholar
Reid, R. E. H. 1968. Microscleres in demosponge classification. University of Kansas Paleontology Contribution, Paper 35, 37 p.Google Scholar
Reid, S. R. 1983. Petrology, paleodepositional environment, and paleoecology of the Lower Devonian Ross Formation, west-central Tennessee. Unpubl. , University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 143 p.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1967. Two new early Paleozoic sponges and the sponge-like organism, Gaspespongia basalis Parks, from the Gaspe Peninsula, Quebec. Journal of Paleontology, 41:766–775.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1970. Two new Upper Devonian sponges from Alberta. Journal of Paleontology, 44:7–16.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1974. Vaurealispongia and Twenhofelella, two new brachiospongid hexactinellid sponges from the Ordovician and Silurian of Anticosti Island, Quebec. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 11:1343–1349.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1986. Sponges of the Burgess Shale (Middle Cambrian), British Columbia. Palaeontographica Canadiana No. 2, 105 p.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., and Bryant, T. L. P. 1979. Fossil sponges of the Mississippian Fort Payne Chert in northeastern Alabama. Journal of Paleontology, 53:1005–1012.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1989. Middle Silurian Ludlovian and Wenlockian sponges from Baillie-Hamilton and Cornwallis Islands, Arctic Canada. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 391, 69 p.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., Keyes, R. Jr., and Horowttz, A. 1979. Two new Mississippian sponges from northwestern Alabama. Journal of Paleontology, 53:709–719.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K., and Webby, B. D. 1988. Late Ordovician sponges from the Malongulli Formation of central New South Wales, Australia. Palaeontographica Americana, 56, 147 p.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O. 1870. Grundzüge einer Spongien-fauna des atlantischen Gebietes. Leipzig, 88 p.Google Scholar
Schrammen, A. 1924. Die Kieselspongien der oberen Kreide von Nordwestdeutschland, III, und letzter Teil. Monographien zür Geologie und Palaeontologie, Berlin, 2(1), 159 p.Google Scholar
Schulze, F. E. 1887. Report on the Hexactinellida collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76. The Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger, Zoology, 21, 514 p.Google Scholar
Scotese, C. R., Van Der Voo, R., and Barrett, S. F. 1985. Silurian and Devonian base maps. Royal Society of London Philosphical Transactions, B, 309:57–77.Google Scholar
Sollas, W. J. 1875. Sponges, p. 451. In Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed.Google Scholar
Sollas, W. J. 1888. Report on the Tetractinellida collected by H. M. S. Challenger during the years 1873–1876, p. 1–458. In Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H. M. S. Challenger during 1873–1876, London, Zoology, 25.Google Scholar
Stuckenberg, A. 1895. Korallen und Bryozoen der Steinkohlenablagerungen des Ural und des Timan. Mémoires du Comité Géologique, St.-Pétersbourg, 10(3), 244 p.Google Scholar
Tschernyschew, T. 1898. Ueber die Artinsk-und Carbon-Schwämme vom Ural und vom Timan. Bulletin de l'Academie des Sciences de St.-Pétersbourg, Series 5, 9:1–36.Google Scholar
Twenhofel, W. H. 1928. Geology and Paleontology of the Mingan Islands. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 11, 132 p.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. 1889. Preliminary description of new Lower Silurian sponges. American Geologist, 3:233–248.Google Scholar
Ulrich, E. O. 1890. American Paleozoic sponges. Geological Survey of Illinois, 8(2, Section 3):209–241, 701–706.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1920. Middle Cambrian Spongiae. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 67:261–364.Google Scholar
Weller, J. M. 1930. Siliceous sponge spicules of Pennsylvanian age from Illinois and Indiana. Journal of Paleontology, 4:233–251.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. W. 1949. Pre-Chattanooga stratigraphy in central Tennessee. Tennessee Division of Geology Bulletin 56, 407 p.Google Scholar
Young, J., and Young, J. 1877. On a Carboniferous Hyalonema and other sponges from Ayrshire. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 4, 20:425–432.Google Scholar
Zittel, K. A. von. 1878. Studien über fossile Spongien, Zweiter Abteilung, Lithistidae; Dritte Abteilung. Monactinellidae, Tetractinellidae und Calcispongiae. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: Mathematische-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, 13(2):91–138.Google Scholar