Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:53:56.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ontogeny of a New Species of the Cambrian Series 3 (Middle Cambrian) Trilobite Genus Liostracina Monke, 1903 from North China and the Taxonomic Position of the Superfamily Trinucleoidea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 October 2015

Tae-Yoon S. Park ,
Ji-Hoon Kihm ,
Imseong Kang  and
Duck K. Choi
Tae-Yoon S. Park
Affiliation:
Division of Polar-Earth System Sciences, Korea Polar Research Institute, Incheon 406–840, Korea, ;
Ji-Hoon Kihm
Affiliation:
Division of Polar-Earth System Sciences, Korea Polar Research Institute, Incheon 406–840, Korea, ;
Imseong Kang
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151–747, Korea, ;
Duck K. Choi
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151–747, Korea, ;
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Order Asaphida was grouped by the presence of a ventral median suture and a globular protaspis. The Superfamily Trinucleoidea has been assigned to the Order Asaphida, based on the recognition of a globular protaspis in the Ordovician representatives of the group, and the presence of a ventral median suture in the middle Cambrian genus Liostracina which has been regarded as a primitive sister-group to the post-Cambrian trinucleoideans. Recent studies demonstrate that the ventral median suture and the globular protaspis could have evolved multiple times in the trilobite evolutionary history, casting doubt on the traditional concept of the Order Asaphida. Inclusion of the Trinucleoidea into the Order Asaphida, therefore, has to be tested. It has recently been revealed that Liostracina simesi Jago and Cooper, 2005 did not possess a ventral median suture, implying that there could have been variable types of ventral suture within the genus Liostracina. Here we report the ontogeny of Liostracina tangwangzhaiensis n. sp. from the Cambrian Series 3 (middle Cambrian) strata of Shandong Province of North China. The material for this study includes protaspides, which are of flat, benthic morphology, contrasting to the globular protaspid morphology of the Ordovician trinucleoideans. The benthic protaspid morphology of L. tangwangzhaiensis indicates an independent evolution of the globular protaspis within the Superfamily Trinucleoidea. Together with the variable types of ventral suture within the genus Liostracina, the benthic protaspid morphology of Liostracina leads us to propose that the Superfamily Trinucleoidea be excluded from the Order Asaphida.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 88 , Issue 2 , March 2014 , pp. 395 - 402
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adrain, J. M. 2011. Class Trilobita Walch, 1771. In Zhang, Z.-Q. (ed.), Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Zootaxa, 3148:104–109.Google Scholar
Adrain, J. M., Peters, S. E., and Westrop, S. R. 2009. The Marjuman trilobite Cedarina Lochman: Thoracic morphology, systematics, and new species from western Utah and eastern Nevada, U.S.A. Zootaxa, 2218:35–58.Google Scholar
Bergeron, J. N. 1899. Étude de quelques trilobites de Chine. Bulletin de la Societé Géologique de France, 3rd Series, 27:499–519.Google Scholar
Brögger, W. C. 1898. Ueber die Verbreitung der Euloma-Niobe Fauna (der Ceratopygen-kalkfauna) in Europa. Nyt Magazin for Naturvidenskaberne, 36:193–240.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E. and Speyer, S. E. 1997. Ontogeny, p. 173–247. In Kaesler, R. L. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. O, Arthropoda 1, Trilobita 1 (Revised). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E., Edgecombe, G.D., Speyer, S. E., Hunt, A.S., and Fortey, R.A. 1994. Ontogeny and relationships of Trinucleoidea (Trilobita). Journal of Paleontology, 68:523–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egorova, L. I., Xiang, L. W., Li, S. J., Nan, R. S., and Guo, Z. M. 1963. Cambrian trilobite faunas of Guizhou and western Hunan. Institute of Geological and Mineral Resources, Special Paper, Series B, Stratigraphy and Palaeontology, 3:1–117.Google Scholar
Endo, R. 1944. Restudies on the Cambrian formations and fossils in Southern Manchoukou. Bulletin of Central National Museum of manchoukou, 7:1–100. (In Japanese) Google Scholar
Endo, R. and Resser, C. E. 1937. The Sinian and Cambrian formations and fossils of southern Manchoukuo. Manchurian Science Museum Bulletin, 1:1–474.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1990. Ontogeny, hypostome attachment and trilobite classification. Palaeontology, 33:529–576.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1997. Classification, p. 289–302. In Kaesler, R. L. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. O, Arthropoda 1, Trilobita 1 (Revised). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1988. Classification of the trilobite suborder Asaphina. Palaeontology, 31:165–222.Google Scholar
Hawle, I. and Corda, A. J. C. 1847. Prodrom einer Monographie der böhmischen Trilobiten. Abhandlungen Koeniglichen boehmischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften. J.G. Calve, Prague, 176 p.Google Scholar
Jago, J. B. and Cooper, R. A. 2005. A Glyptagnostus stolidotus fauna from the Cambrian of northern Victoria Land, Antarctica. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 48:661–681.Google Scholar
Lin, T., Lin, H., and Zhou, T. 1983. Discovery of the Cambrian trilobites in Kunshan of southeast Jiangsu with reference to the faunal provinciality and palaeogeography. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 22:399–412.Google Scholar
Monke, H. 1903. Beiträge zur Geologie von Schantung. Part 1: Obercambrische Trilobiten von Yen-tsy-yai. Jahrbuch der Königliche Preussische Geologische Landesanstalt, Berlin, 23:103–151.Google Scholar
Öpik, A. A. 1967. The Mindyallan fauna of north-western Queensland. Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics (Australia), Bulletin 74, 404 p., 166 pls., 2 vols. Google Scholar
Park, T.-Y. and Choi, D. K. 2009. Post-embryonic development of the Furongian (late Cambrian) trilobite Tsinania canens implications for life mode and phylogeny. Evolution and Development, 11:441–455.Google Scholar
Park, T.-Y. and Choi, D. K. 2010. Ontogeny and ventral median suture of the ptychaspidid trilobite Asioptychaspis subglobosa (Sun, 1924) from the Furongian (upper Cambrian) Hwajeol Formation, Korea. Journal of Paleontology, 84:309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, T.-Y. and Choi, D. K. 2011 a. Ontogeny of the Furongian (late Cambrian) remopleuridioid trilobite Haniwa quadrata Kobayashi, 1933 from Korea: implications for trilobite taxonomy. Geological Magazine, 148:288–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, T.-Y. and Choi, D. K. 2011 b. Constraints on using ontogenetic data for trilobite phylogeny. Lethaia, 44:250–254.Google Scholar
Park, T.-Y. and Choi, D. K. 2011 c. Trilobite faunal successions across the base of the Furongian Series in the Taebaek Group, Taebaeksan Basin, Korea. Geobios, 44:481–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, T.-Y., Moon, S. J., Han, Z., and Choi, D. K. 2008. Ontogeny of the middle Cambrian trilobite Shantungia spinifera Walcott, 1905 from North China and its taxonomic significance. Journal of Paleontology, 82:851–855.Google Scholar
Peng, S.-C., Babcock, L. E., and Lin, H.-L. 2004. Polymerid Trilobites from the Cambrian of Northwestern Hunan, China. Science Press, Beijing, Volume 1 and Volume 2.Google Scholar
Qiu, H.-A., Lu, Y.-H., Zhu, Z.-L., Bi, D.-C., Lin, T.-R., Zhang, Q.-Z., Qian, Y.-Y., Ju, T.-Y., Han, N.-R., and Wei, X.-Z. 1983. Trilobita, p. 28–254. In Palaeontological Atlas of East China, 1: Volume of Early Palaeozoic, Geological Publishing House, Beijing. (In Chinese) Google Scholar
Raymond, P. E. 1937. Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician Trilobita and Ostracoda from Vermont. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 48:1079–1146.Google Scholar
Shaw, F. C. 1968. Early Middle Ordovician Chazy trilobites of New York. New York State Museum and Science Service, Memoir 17, 163 p.Google Scholar
Shergold, J. H., Laurie, J. R., and Shergold, J. E. 2007. Cambrian and Early Ordovician trilobite taxonomy and biostratigraphy, Bonaparte Basin, Western Australia. Memoirs of the Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, 34:17–86.Google Scholar
Speyer, S. E. and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1989. Trilobite larvae and larval ecology. Historical Biology, 3:27–60.Google Scholar
Waisfeld, B. G., Vaccari, N. E., Edgecombe, G. D., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 2011. The Upper Ordovician trinucleoid trilobite Bancroftolithus from the Precordillera of Argentina. Journal of Paleontology, 85:1160–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1905. Cambrian faunas of China. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, 29:1–106.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1913. The Cambrian faunas of China. In Research in China, Volume 3. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 54:3–276.Google Scholar
Webster, M. 2011. The structure of cranidial shape variation in three early ptychoparioid trilobite species from the Dyeran–Delamaran (traditional “lower–middle” Cambrian) boundary interval of Nevada, U.S.A. Journal of Paleontology, 85:179–225.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. 1959. Silicified Middle Ordovician trilobites: Remopleurididae, Trinucleidae, Raphiophoridae, Endymionidae. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 121:371–496.Google Scholar
Whittington, H. B. and Kelly, S. R. A. 1997. Morphological terms applied to Trilobita. p. 313–329. In Kaesler, R. L. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part O, Trilobita (Revised), Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Zelditch, M. L., Swiderski, D. L., Sheet, H. D., and Fink, W. L. 2004. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
Zhang, W.-T. and Jell, P. A. 1987. Cambrian Trilobites of North China, Chinese Cambrian Trilobites Housed in the Smithsonian Institution. Science Press, Beijing.Google Scholar
Zhang, W.-T., Xiang, L.-W., Liu, Y.-H., and Meng, X.-S. 1995. Cambrian Stratigraphy and trilobites from Henan. Palaeontologia Cathayana, 6:1–166.Google Scholar
Zhou, T.-M., Liu, Y.-J., Meng, X.-S., and Sun, Z.-H. 1977. Trilobita, p. 104–266. In Wang, X.-F. (ed.), Palaeontological Atlas of South-central China, Volume 1, Early Palaeozoic. Geological Publishing House, Beijing. (In Chinese) Google Scholar
Zhu, X.-J., Hughes, N. C., and Peng, S.-C. 2010. Ventral structure and ontogeny of the late Furongian (Cambrian) trilobite Guangxiaspis guangxiensis Zhou, 1977 and the diphyletic origin of the median suture. Journal of Paleontology, 84:493–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar