Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:26:53.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Populist parties shifting the political discourse? A case study of the Economic Freedom Fighters in South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2021

Marine Fölscher ,
Nicola de Jager  and
Robert Nyenhuis
Marine Fölscher*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Stellenbosch, Arts Building, Cnr. Merriman Ave. and Ryneveld St., Stellenbosch7600, South Africa
Nicola de Jager*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Stellenbosch, Arts Building, Cnr. Merriman Ave. and Ryneveld St., Stellenbosch7600, South Africa
Robert Nyenhuis*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, California State University, 3801 W. Temple Avenue, Building 94, Room 303, Pomona, CA91768-4055, USA
*
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the use of populist discourse in South African politics. We investigate speeches of leaders from the ruling African National Congress (ANC) and opposition parties, the Democratic Alliance (DA) and the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF). We find that the EFF consistently employs populist appeals, while both the incumbent ANC and official opposition DA largely refrain. Our longitudinal analysis allows an examination of fluctuation across party leaders and electoral cycles, and illustrates that neither the ANC nor the DA have modified their political discourses in light of a rising populist challenger. However, there is some evidence that the two most dominant parties have reformed their programmatic offerings and behaviour in an attempt to compete with the EFF's popular appeal. The South African case offers important insights into the study of oppositional populism on the African continent, and a window into how major political parties may respond to emerging populist contenders.

Keywords

PopulismSouth Africaoriginal datadiscourse analysispolitical partiesANCDAEFF
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Modern African Studies , Volume 59 , Issue 4 , December 2021 , pp. 535 - 558
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akkerman, A., Mudde, C. & Zaslove, A.. 2014. ‘How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters’, Comparative Political Studies 47, 9: 1324–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, N. 2018. ‘DA to report Malema to Equality Court over ‘hate speech’.’ <https://www.thesouthafrican.com/da-report-malema-equality-court-hate-speech/>, accessed 20.1.2020.,+accessed+20.1.2020.>Google Scholar
Barr, R. 2003. ‘The persistence of neopopulism in Peru? From Fujimori to Toledo’, Third World Quarterly 24, 6: 1161–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, R. 2009. ‘Populists, outsiders and anti-establishment politics’, Party Politics 15, 1: 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, F.H. 1979. Dependency and Development in Latin America [Dependencia y Desarrollo en América Latina]. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Citizen. 2014. ‘DA reveals blue beret.’ 3 March. <https://citizen.co.za/news/south-africa/137022/da-reveals-blue-beret/>..>Google Scholar
De Jager, N. (ed.). 2015. ‘Apartheid to democracy’, in South African Politics: An Introduction. Cape Town: Oxford University Press Southern Africa, 76–94.Google Scholar
De Jager, N. & Steenekamp, C.. 2018. ‘Political radicalism: responding to the legitimacy gap in South Africa,’ in Van Beek, U., ed. Democracy under Threat: a crisis of legitimacy? London: Palgrave, 147–69.Google Scholar
De la Torre, C. 2014. The Promise and Perils of Populism: global perspectives. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar
Di Tella, T.S. 1965. Populism and Reform in Latin America. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Drake, P.W. (ed.). 1982. ‘Conclusion: requiem for populism?’ In Latin American Populism in Comparative Perspective. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, 217–46.Google Scholar
Dubow, S. 2000. The African National Congress. Gloucestershire: Sutton Publishing.Google Scholar
Fisher, M. 2014. ‘EFF members a no-show at parliamentary disciplinary hearing.’ <http://ewn.co.za/2014/10/08/EFF-members-refuse-to-show-up-at-disciplinary-hearing.>, accessed 20.1.2021.,+accessed+20.1.2021.>Google Scholar
Germani, G. 1978. Authoritarianism, Fascism, and National Populism. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Grootes, S. 2019. ‘DA unveils “pro-all South Africans” manifesto that is decidedly anti-expropriation.’ Daily Maverick, 23 February. <https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2019-02-23-da-unveils-pro-all-south-africans-manifesto-that-is-decidedly-anti-expropriation/>, accessed 22.7.2019.,+accessed+22.7.2019.>Google Scholar
Gumede, W.M. 2019. ‘How the EFF has shifted SA politics to the left.’ News24, 28 May. <https://www.news24.com/Columnists/GuestColumn/how-the-eff-has-shifted-sa-politics-to-the-left-20190528>, accessed 3.6.2019.,+accessed+3.6.2019.>Google Scholar
Hadiz, V.R. & Chryssogelos, A.. 2017. ‘Populism in world politics: a comparative cross-regional perspective’, International Political Science Review 38, 4: 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haffajee, F. 2020. From schoolyard bullies to emerging fascists: the EFF's unstoppable politics of violence. The Daily Maverick, 13 September. <https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2020-09-13-from-schoolyard-bullies-to-emerging-fascists-the-effs-unstoppable-politics-of-violence/>, accessed 20.1.2021., accessed 20.1.2021.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Haffajee,+F.+2020.+From+schoolyard+bullies+to+emerging+fascists:+the+EFF's+unstoppable+politics+of+violence.+The+Daily+Maverick,+13+September.+,+accessed+20.1.2021.>Google Scholar
Harris, M. 2014. The supporter profiles of SA's three largest parties – Ipsos. PoliticsWeb, 5 February. <https://web.archive.org/web/20140222022154/http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page72308?oid=534039&sn=Marketingweb+detail&pid=90389>, accessed 9.10.2019., accessed 9.10.2019.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Harris,+M.+2014.+The+supporter+profiles+of+SA's+three+largest+parties+–+Ipsos.+PoliticsWeb,+5+February.+,+accessed+9.10.2019.>Google Scholar
Hawkins, K.A. 2009. ‘Is Chávez populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective’, Comparative Political Studies 42, 8: 1040–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, K.A. 2010. Venezuela's Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, K.A. & Rovira Kaltwasser, C.. 2019. ‘Introduction: the ideational approach’, in Hawkins, K.A., Carlin, R.E., Littvay, L. & Rovira Kaltwasser, C., eds. The Ideational Approach to Populism. New York, NY: Routledge, 1–24.Google Scholar
Hawkins, K.A., Aguilar, R., Castanho Silva, B., Jenne, E.K., Kocijan, B. & Rovira Kaltwasser, C.. 2019 a. ‘Measuring Populist Discourse: The Global Populism Database.’ Paper presented at the 2019 EPSA Annual Conference in Belfast, UK, 20–22 June.Google Scholar
Hawkins, K.A., Carlin, R.E., Littvay, L. & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (eds). 2019 b. The Ideational Approach to Populism: concept, theory, and analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R.F. & Norris, P.. 2016. ‘Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: economic have-nots and cultural backlash.’ Harvard Kennedy School of Government: Faculty Research Working Paper Series.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ionescu, G. & Gellner, E. (eds). 1969. Populism: its meaning and national characteristics. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kimenyi, M.S. 2006. ‘Ethnicity, governance and the provision of public goods’, Journal of African Economies 15, 1: 62–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laclau, E. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S. & Loxton, J.. 2013. ‘Populism and competitive authoritarianism in the Andes’, Democratization 20, 1: 107–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangcu, X. 2012. ‘African modernity and the struggle for people's power: from protest and mobilization to community organizing’, The Good Society 21, 2: 279–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melber, H. 2018. ‘Populism in Southern Africa under liberation movements as governments’, Review of African Political Economy 45, 158: 678–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, B. 2015. ‘How to perform crisis: a model for understanding the key role of crisis in contemporary populism’, Government and Opposition 50, 2: 189–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, B. & Tormey, S.. 2014. ‘Rethinking populism: politics, mediatisation and political style’, Political Studies 62, 2: 381–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Msomi, S. 2016. Mmusi Maimane: prophet or puppet? Cape Town: Jonathan Ball Publishers.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. 2004. ‘The populist zeitgeist’, Government and Opposition 39, 4: 541–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C. & Rovira Kaltwasser, C.. 2013. ‘Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America’, Government and Opposition 48, 2: 147–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C. & Rovira Kaltwasser, C.. 2017. Populism: a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C. & Rovira Kaltwasser, C.. 2018. ‘Studying populism in comparative perspective: reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda’, Comparative Political Studies 51, 3: 1667–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, J.W. 2016. What is Populism? Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuman, W.L. 2011. Social Research Methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Seventh edition. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Ostiguy, P. 2017. ‘A socio-cultural approach’, in Ostiguy, P., Kaltwasser, C.R., Taggart, P. & Espejo, P.O., eds. Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 74–96.Google Scholar
Resnick, D. 2014. Urban Poverty and Party Populism in African Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Resnick, D. 2018. ‘The influence of populist leaders on African democracy’, in Torre, C.D.L., ed. Routledge Handbook of Global Populism. New York, NY: Routledge, 263–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, L. 2013. Handling Qualitative Data: a practical guide. Fourth edition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Roberts, K.M. 2006. ‘Populism, political conflict, and grass-roots organization in Latin America’, Comparative Politics 38, 2: 127–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. 2014. ‘The economic freedom fighters: birth of a giant?’, in Schulz-Herzenberg, C. & Southall, R., eds. Election 2014 South Africa: the campaigns, results and future prospects. Auckland Park: Jacana Media, 72–88.Google Scholar
Rooduijn, M. & T. Pauwels. 2011. ‘Measuring populism: comparing two methods of content analysis’, West European Politics 34, 6: 1272–83.Google Scholar
Singer, M. 2018. ‘The meaning, origin, and consequences of populist politics’, in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, A. 2016. An Introduction to African Politics. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hauwaert, S.M. & S. Van Kessel. 2018. ‘Beyond protest and discontent: a cross-national analysis of the effect of populist attitudes and issue positions on populist party support’, European Journal of Political Research 57, 1: 68–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, K. 2001. ‘Clarifying a contested concept: populism in the study of Latin American politics’, Comparative Politics 34, 1: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, K. 2017. ‘A political-strategic approach,’ in Ostiguy, P., Kaltwasser, C.R., Taggart, P. & Espejo, P.O., eds. Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 26–48.Google Scholar
Weyland, K. 2018. ‘Populism and authoritarianism’, in Torre, C.D.L., ed. Routledge Handbook of Global Populism. New York, NY: Routledge, 319–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakaria, F. 1997. ‘The rise of illiberal democracy’, Foreign Affairs 76, 6: 22–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar