Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T03:46:33.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical Study of the Influence of Combustion Models and Kinetic Schemes When Predicting the Diffusion Flames

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2012

A. Khelil ,
S. Nechad ,
H. Naji ,
L. Loukarfi ,
M. Braikia  and
M. Beriache
A. Khelil
Affiliation:
University Hassiba Benbouali, B.P. 151, 2000 Chlef, Algeria
S. Nechad
Affiliation:
University Hassiba Benbouali, B.P. 151, 2000 Chlef, Algeria
H. Naji*
Affiliation:
LGCgE, Université d'Artois/FSA de Béthune, F-62400, France; Université Lille Nord de France, F-59000 Lille, France
L. Loukarfi
Affiliation:
University Hassiba Benbouali, B.P. 151, 2000 Chlef, Algeria
M. Braikia
Affiliation:
University Hassiba Benbouali, B.P. 151, 2000 Chlef, Algeria
M. Beriache
Affiliation:
LGCgE, Université d'Artois/FSA de Béthune, F-62400, France; Université Lille Nord de France, F-59000 Lille, France University Hassiba BenboualiB.P. 151, 2000 Chlef, Algeria
*
* Corresponding author ([email protected])
Get access

Abstract

This article aims to study numerically three-dimensional (3D) reactive turbulent flow in a combustion chamber of a gas turbine by solving a steady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) )and energy equations. The Reynolds stress model (RSM) is coupled with the probability density function (PDF), laminar flamelet and Chemistry models to describe the turbulent flow and turbulence–chemistry interaction. Numerical computations are conducted to exhibit thermal and concentration behaviour under a quite number of factors, which influence the combustion process. Their influence are examined and compared favourably with available experimental results. Concentration of some radicals as O and OH are obtained assuming the partial-equilibrium assumption and using a PDF in terms of temperature. The 3D simulations demonstrate that the use of RSM, PDF and flamelet model allow simulating velocity and thermochemical fields.

Keywords

Combustion chamberDiffusion flameSwirling turbulent flowChemical kinetics models
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 701 - 713
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Guo, Z. M., Zhang, H. Q., Chan, C. K. and Lin, W. Y., “Presumed Joint Probability Density Function Model for Turbulent Combustion,” Fuel, 82, pp. 1091–1101 (2003).Google Scholar
2.Collazo, J., Porteiro, J., Patino, D., Migueze, J. L., Granada, E. and Moran, J., “Simulation and Experimental Validation of a Methanol Burner,” Fuel, 88, pp. 326–334 (2009).Google Scholar
3.Hossain, M. and Malalasekera, W., “A Combustion Model Sensitivity Study for CH4/H2 Bluff-Body Stabilized Flame,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 221, pp. 1377–1385 (2007).Google Scholar
4.Ma, C. Y., Mahmud, T., Gaskell, P. H. and Hampartsouian, E., “Numerical Predictions of a Turbulent Diffusion Flame in a Cylindrical Combustor Using Eddy Dissipation and Flamelet Combustion Models,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 213, pp. 697–705 (1999).Google Scholar
5.Ravikanti, M., Malalasekera, W., Hossain, M. and Mahmud, T., “Flamelet Based NOx-Radiation Integrated Modelling of Turbulent Non-premixed Flame using Reynolds-stress Closure,” Flow Turbulence Combustion, 81, pp. 301–319 (2008).Google Scholar
6.Khelil, A., Naji, H., Loukarfi, L. and Mompean, G., “Prediction of a High Swirled Natural Gas Diffusion Flame Using a PDF Model,” Fuel, 88, pp. 374–381 (2009).Google Scholar
7.Meier, W., Keck, O., Noll, B., Kunz, O. and Stricker, W., “Investigation in the TECFLAM Swirling Diffusion Flame: Laser Raman Measurements and CFD Calculations,” Applied Physics, B71, pp. 725–731 (2000).Google Scholar
8.Landenfeld, T., Kremer, A., Hassel, E. P., Janicka, J., Schäfer, T., Kazenwadel, J. and Schulz, C. J., “Laser-Diagnostic and Numerical Study of Strongly Swirling Natural Gas Flames,” Twenty-Seventh Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, pp. 1023–1029 (1998).Google Scholar
9.Gupta, A. K., Lilley, D. G. and Syred, N., Swirl Fows, Abacus Press, London (1984)Google Scholar
10.Leuckel, W., “Combustion Fundamentals and Concept of Advanced Burner Technology,” 6th European Conference on Industrial Furnaces and Boilers – INFUB,Estoril,Portugal (2002).Google Scholar
11.Meier, W., Keck, O., Noll, B., Kunz, O. and Stricker, W., “Investigation in the TECFLAM Swirling Diffusion Flame: Laser Raman Measurements and CFD Calculations,” Applied Physics, B71, pp. 725–731 (2000).Google Scholar
12.Meier, W., Noll, B., Bockhorn, H., Leuckel, W., Schulz, C., Wolfrum, J., Schneider, C., Repp, S., Sadiki, A., Dreizler, A. and Janicka, J., “Confined TECFLAM Swirl Burner: Experimental Investigations and Numerical Simulations,” 5th International Workshop on Measurement and Computation of Turbulent Nonpremixed Flames (TNF5 Workshop),July 26-28, 2000,Delft,Holland, Editor R. Barlow, pp. 142–173 (2000).Google Scholar
13.Pesenti, B., “Numerical and Experimental Characterization of a Gas Burner with Variable Swirl: Languid Flame, Heat Transfer and Production of NOx,” Thesis, Polytechnic Faculty of Mons (2006)Google Scholar
14.Zhou, X., Sun, Z., Bernner, G. and Durst, F., “Combustion Modelling of Turbulent Jet Diffusion H2/Air Flame with Detailed Chemistry,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 43, pp. 2075–2088 (2000).Google Scholar
15.German, A. E. and Mahmud, T., “Modelling of Non-Premixed Swirl Burner Flows Using a Reynolds-Stress Turbulence Closure,” Fuel, 84, pp. 583–594 (2005).Google Scholar
16.Yapici, H., Kayatas, N., Albayrak, B. and Basturk, G., “Numerical Calculation of Local Entropy Generation in a Methane-Air Burner,” Energy Conversion and Management, 46, pp. 1885–1919 (2005).Google Scholar
17.Repp, S., Sadiki, A., Schneider, C., Hinz, A., Landenfeld, T. and Janicka, J., “Prediction of Swirling Confined Diffusion Flame with a Monte Carlo and a Presumed-PDF-Model,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 45, pp. 1271–1285 (2002).Google Scholar
18.Hossain, M. and Malalasekera, W., “Modelling of a Bluff-Body Stabilized CH4/H2 Flame Based on a Laminar Flamelet Model with Emphasis on NO Prediction,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical, Part A: Power and Energy, 217, pp. 201–210 (2003).Google Scholar
19.Habibi, A., Merci, B. and Roekaerts, D., “Turbulence Radiation Interaction in Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations of Nonpremixed Piloted Turbulent Laboratory-Scale Flames,” Combustion and Flame, 151, pp. 303–320 (2007).Google Scholar
20.Merci, B., Naud, B. and Roekaerts, D., “Flow and Mixing Fields for Transported Scalar PDF Simulation of a Piloted Jet Diffusion Flame, Flow,” Turbulence and Combustion, 74, pp. 239–272 (2005).Google Scholar
21.Hossain, M. and Malalasekera, W., “Simulation Study Bluff-Body Non-Premixed Flame Structures Using Laminar Flamelet Model,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical, Part A: Power and Energy, 219, pp. 361–370 (2005).Google Scholar
22.Frassoldati, A., Frigerio, S., Colombo, E., Inzoli, F. and Faravelli, T., “Determination of Nox Emissions from Strong Swirling Confined Flames with an Integrated CFD-Based Procedure,” Chemical Engineering Science, 60, pp. 2851–2869 (2005).Google Scholar
23.Faravelli, T., Bua, L., Frassoldati, A., Antifora, A., Tognotti, L. and Ranzi, E., “A New Procedure for Predicting Nox Emissions from Furnaces,” Computers & Chemical Engineering, 25, pp. 613–618 (2001).Google Scholar
24.Khelil, A., Naji, H. and Loukarfi, L., “Numerical Study of Swirling Confined Non-Premixed Flames with Determination of Pollutant Emissions,” International Review of Mechanical Engineering, 6, pp. 618–627 (2007).Google Scholar
25.Keck, O., Meier, W., Stricker, W. and Aigner, M., “Establishment of a Confined Swirling Natural Gas/Air Flame as a Standard Flame: Temperature and Species Distributions from Laser Raman Measurements,” Combustion Science and Technology, 174, pp. 117–151 (2002).Google Scholar
26. Fluent 6.0 User's Guide.Google Scholar
27.Launder, B. E., “Second-Moment Closure and its Use in Modelling Turbulent Industrial Flows,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 9, pp. 963–985 (1989).Google Scholar
28.Peters, N., “Laminar Diffusion Flamelet Models in Non Premixed Combustion,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 10, pp. 319–339 (1984).Google Scholar
29.Peters, N., “Laminar Flamelet Concepts in Turbulent Combustion,” Twenty-first Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, pp. 1231–1250 (1988).Google Scholar
30.Bray, K. N. and Peters, N., “Laminar Flamelets in Turbulent Flames,” Turbulent Reacting Flows, Academic Press, pp. 63–114 (1994).Google Scholar
31.Westbrook, C. K. and Dryer, F. L., “Chemical Kinetic Modelling of Hydrocarbon Combustion,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 10, pp. 1–57 (1984).Google Scholar
32.Smooke, M. D., Puri, I. K. and Seshadri, K., “A Comparison Between Numerical Calculations and Experimental Measurements of the Structure of a Counter Flow Diffusion Flame Burning Diluted Methane in Diluted Air,” Twenty-first Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, pp. 1783–1792 (1988).Google Scholar
33.Yang, W. P. and Zhang, J., “Simulation of Swirling Turbulent Combustion in the TECFLAM Combustor,” Computer and Chemical Engineering, 32, pp. 2280–2289 (2008).Google Scholar
34.Yang, W. P. and Zhang, J., “Simulation of Methane Turbulent Swirling Flame in the TECFLAM Combustor,” Computer and Chemical Engineering, 33, pp. 2818–2830 (2009).Google Scholar
35.Schmittel, P., Gunther, B., Lenze, B., Leuckel, W. and Bockhorn, H., “Turbulent Swirling Flames: Experimental Investigation of the Flow Field and Formation of Nitrogen Oxide,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 28, pp. 303–309 (2000).Google Scholar