Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T01:14:14.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variation of Initial Soil Suction with Compaction Conditions for Clayey Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2012

S.-R. Yang*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung, Taiwan 91201, R.O.C.
H.-D. Lin
Affiliation:
Department of Construction Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan 10672, R.O.C.
W.-H. Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan County, Taiwan 32054, R.O.C.
*
*Corresponding author ([email protected])
Get access

Abstract

In this study, the initial soil suction of as-compacted clayey soils was evaluated for various compaction conditions, covering a wide range of compaction energy and molding water content. The soil specimens were prepared by impact compaction under three levels of compaction energy. The filter paper method was used to measure the initial soil suction of as-compacted specimens. Test results indicate that the relationship between the soil suction and the molding water content is bilinear under three different compaction energies. However, the effect of compaction energy on soil suction is different for the soils with different amounts of clay fraction and is elucidated by the macro soil properties. The change of soil suction due to different compaction energies can be predicted by the void ratio and the degree of saturation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Miller, C. J., Yesiller, N., Yaldo, K. and Merayyan, S., “Impact of Soil Type and Compaction Conditions on Soil Water Characteristic,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 128, pp. 733742 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Chen, Y. J. and Yu, P. J., “Pore Pressure Dissipation Features of an Unsaturated Compacted Soil,” Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Unsaturated Soils, Balkema, Paris, France, pp. 439445 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Cui, Y. J. and Delage, P., “Yielding and Plastic Behaviour of an Unsaturated Compacted Silt,” Geotechnique, 46, pp. 291311 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Alonso, E. E., Vaunat, J. and Gens, A., “Modelling the Mechanical Behaviour of Expansive Clays,” Engineering Geology, 54, pp. 173183 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Wheeler, S. J. and Sivakumar, V., “Influence of Compaction Procedure on the Mechanical Behaviour of an Unsaturated Compacted Clay. Part 2: Shearing and Constitutive Modelling,” Geotechnique, 50, pp. 369376 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Ng, C. W. W. and Chiu, C. F., “Behaviour of a Loosely Compacted Unsaturated Volcanic Soil,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 127, pp. 10271036 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Rao, S. M. and Revanasiddappa, K., “Role of Soil Structure and Soil Suction in Collapse of a Compacted Clay Soil,” Geotechnical Testing Journal, 26, pp. 19 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Cokca, E., Erol, O. and Armangil, F., “Effect of Compaction Moisture Content on the Shear Strength of an Unsaturated Clay,” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 22, pp. 285297 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Yang, S. R., Lin, H. D., Kung, J. H. S. and Huang, W. H., “Suction-Controlled Laboratory Test on Resilient Modulus of Compacted Subgrade Soils,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 134, pp. 13751384 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Yang, S. R. and Lin, H. D., “Influence of Soil Suction on Small-Strain Stiffness of Compacted Residual Subgrade Soil,” Transportation Research Record 2101, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., pp. 6371 (2009).Google Scholar
11. Yang, S. R., Huang, W. H. and Tai, Y. T., “Variation of Resilient Modulus with Soil Suction for Compacted Subgrade Soils,” Transportation Research Record 1913, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., pp. 99106 (2005).Google Scholar
12. Kung, H. S. Johnson., Lin, H. D., Yang, S. R. and Huang, W. H., “Resilient Modulus and Plastic Strain of Unsaturated Cohesive Subgrade Soils,” Unsaturated Soils 2006—Geotechnical Special Publication 147, ASCE, pp. 541552 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Chu, T. Y. and Mou, C. H., “Soil-Suction Approach for Evaluation of Swelling Potential,” Transportation Research Record 790, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., pp. 5460 (1981).Google Scholar
14. Marinho, F. A. M. and Stuermer, M. M., “Influence of the Compaction Energy on the SWCC of a Residual Soil,” Geotechnical Special Publication 99, ASCE, pp. 25141 (2000).Google Scholar
15. Rao, S. M. and Revanasiddappa, K., “Role of Soil Suction in Collapse of Compacted Clay Soil,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 126, pp. 8590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Tripathy, S., Leong, E. C. and Rahardjo, H., “Suction of Compacted Residual Soils,” Proceedings of the International Conference: From Experimental Evidence Towards Numerical Modeling of Unsaturated Soils, Weimar, Germany, pp. 111122 (2003).Google Scholar
17. Romero, E., Gens, A. and Lloret, A., “Water Permeability, Water Retention and Microstructure of Unsaturated Compacted Boom Clay,” Engineering Geology, 54, pp. 117127 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Fredlund, D. G. and Rahardjo, H., Soil Mechanics for Unsaturated Soils, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1993).Google Scholar
19. Likos, W. J. and Lu, N., “Filter Paper Technique for Measuring Total Soil Suction,” Transportation Research Record 1786, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., pp. 120128 (2002).Google Scholar
20. Bulut, R., Lytton, R. L. and Wray, W. K., “Soil Suction Measurements by Filter Paper,” Geotechnical Special Publication 115, ASCE, pp. 243261 (2001).Google Scholar