Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:07:15.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sintering of Nanopowders of Amorphous Silicon Nitride Under Ultrahigh Pressure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Ya-Li Li*
Affiliation:
Department of Micro-Crystalline and Laser Processing, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 72 Wenhua Road, Shenyang 110015, People's Republic of China
Yong Liang
Affiliation:
Department of Micro-Crystalline and Laser Processing, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 72 Wenhua Road, Shenyang 110015, People's Republic of China
Fen Zheng
Affiliation:
Department of Micro-Crystalline and Laser Processing, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 72 Wenhua Road, Shenyang 110015, People's Republic of China
Xian-Feng Ma
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ultrahigh Pressure, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 159 Renming Street, Changchun 130022, People's Republic of China
Suo-Jing Cui
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ultrahigh Pressure, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 159 Renming Street, Changchun 130022, People's Republic of China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. Present address: National Institute for Research in Inorganic Materials, Research Center for Advanced Materials, 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Nanopowders of amorphous silicon nitride were densified and sintered without additives under ultrahigh pressure (1.0–5.0 GPa) between room temperature and 1600 °C. The powders had a mean diameter of 18 nm and contained ∼5.0 wt% oxygen that came from air-exposure oxidation. Sintering results at different temperatures were characterized in terms of sintering density, hardness, phase structure, and grain size. It was observed that the nanopowders can be pressed to a high density (87%) even at room temperature under the high pressure. Bulk Si3N4 amorphous and crystalline ceramics (relative density: 95–98%) were obtained at temperatures slightly below the onset of crystallization (1000–1100 °C) and above 1420 °C, respectively. Rapid grain growth occurred during the crystallization leading to a grain size (>160 nm) almost 1 order of magnitude greater than the starting particulate diameters. With the rise of sintering temperature, a final density was reached between 1350 and 1420 °C, which seemed to be independent of the pressure applied (1.0–5.0 GPa). The densification temperature observed under the high pressure is lower by 580 °C than that by hot isostatic pressing sintering, suggesting a significantly enhanced low-temperature sintering of the nanopowders under a high external pressure.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Ziegler, G., Hernrich, J., and Wotting, G., J. Mater. Sci. 22, 3041 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Richerson, D.W., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 52, 560 (1973).Google Scholar
3.Shimada, M., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 65, 1153 (1986).Google Scholar
4.Prochazka, S. and Rocco, W.A., High Temp.-High Press. 10, 87 (1978).Google Scholar
5.Yamada, T., Shimada, M., and Koizumi, M., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 60, 1279 (1981).Google Scholar
6.Shimada, M., Ogawa, N., Koizumi, M., Dachille, F., and Roy, R., Am. Ceram. Bull. 60, 1281 (1981).Google Scholar
7.Tanaka, T., Peztotti, G., Okamoto, T., and Koizumi, M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72, 1656 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Hahn, H., Logas, J., and Averback, R.S., J. Mater. Res. 5, 609 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Mayo, M.J., Hague, D.C., and Chen, D.J., Mater. Sci. Eng. A166, 145 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Danforth, S.C., Symons, W., Nilsen, R.J., and Rimen, R.E., in Advanced Ceramic Processing and Technology, edited by Binner, J.G.P (Noyes, Park Ridge, NJ, 1990), Vol. 1, p. 39.Google Scholar
11.Symons, W. and Danforth, S.C., in Proc. 3rd. Int. Conf. Ceramic Mater. and Components for Engines, edited by Tennery, V.J. (Am. Ceram. Soc., Weterville, OH, 1989), p. 67.Google Scholar
12.Danforth, S.C., Nano. Mater. 1, 197 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Pechenik, A., Diermarini, G.J., and Danforth, S.C., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75, 3283 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Pechenik, A., Piermarini, G.J., and Danforth, S.C., Nanostruct. Mater. 2, 479 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Cannon, W.R., Danforth, S.C., Flint, J.H., Haggerty, J.S., and Mara, R.A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 65, 324 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Cannon, W.R., Danforth, S.C., Flint, J.H., Haggerty, J.S., and Mara, R.A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 65, 330 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Nilsen, K., Danforth, S.C., and Wauter, H., in Advances in Ceramics, Vol 21: Ceramic Powder Science (Am. Ceram. Soc., Westerville, OH, 1987), p. 537.Google Scholar
18.Cui, S.J., Zhao, T.H., Yan, X.W., Ma, X.F., Zhu, Y.B., Chen, J.H., and Zhao, W., Chin. J. High Pressure Phys. 8, 99 (1994).Google Scholar
19.Klug, H.P. and Alexander, L.E., X-Ray Diffraction Procedure of Polycrystalline and Amorphous Materials (John Wiley, New York, 1954), p. 495.Google Scholar
20.Berriche, R. and Holt, R.T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76, 1602 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Weiss, W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 67, 213 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar