Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T07:04:03.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adsorbents with sustainable CO2 capture capacity prepared from carboxymethylcellulose

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2014

Qiong Wu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Processing of Forest Production, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
Wei Li*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Processing of Forest Production, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
Linlin Dai
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Processing of Forest Production, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
Yanjiao Wu
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Processing of Forest Production, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
Shouxin Liu*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Processing of Forest Production, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Adsorbents with high specific surface areas, developed porosities, and sustainable CO2 capture capacity (∼180 mg/g at 25 °C, 1 bar) were prepared by KOH activation of hydrothermally carbonized carboxymethylcellulose (CMC). Condensed aromatic carbon materials (CSc) with particle diameters of 2–3 μm and many oxygen-containing groups on their surfaces can be obtained after hydrothermal treatment of CMC; these materials are similar to glucose-derived hydrothermal carbons. The activation conditions, including activation ratio and activation temperature, significantly influence the structure and morphology of the adsorbents. In turn, the pore structures, specific surface areas, and adsorption conditions significantly affect the adsorption capacities of these new adsorbents. For samples with the same activation ratio, those with higher specific surface areas show higher CO2 capture capacities at 25 °C and 1 bar. Under these conditions, for samples with different activation ratios, the capacity is dominated by the microporosity development and, in particular, the high volume of smaller micropores (d = 0.4–0.9 nm); when the adsorption pressure is decreased to 0.1 bar, the CO2 capture ability becomes closely correlated with the number of ultramicropores (d < 0.7 nm).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Rao, A.B. and Rubin, E.S.: A technical, economic, and environmental assessment of amine-based CO2 capture technology for power plant greenhouse gas control. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 4467 (2002).Google Scholar
Zhuang, L.Z., Chen, S.X., Lin, R.J., and Xu, X.Z.: Preparation of a solid amine adsorbent based on polypropylene fiber and its performance for CO2 capture. J. Mater. Res. 28, 2881 (2013).Google Scholar
Sevilla, M., Valle-Vigon, P., and Fuertes, A.B.: N-doped polypyrrole-based porous carbons for CO2 capture. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 2781 (2011).Google Scholar
Jacobs, P.A., Van Cauwelaert, F.H., Vansant, E.F., and Uytterhoeven, J.B.: Surface probing of synthetic faujasites by adsorption of carbon dioxide. Part 1. – Infra-red study of carbon dioxide adsorbed on Na-Ca-Y and Na-Mg-Y zeolites. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1, 1056 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montanari, T. and Busca, G.: On the mechanism of adsorption and separation of CO2 on LTA zeolites: An IR investigation. Vib. Spectrosc. 46, 45 (2008).Google Scholar
Bae, Y.S., Mulfort, K.L., Frost, H., Ryan, P., Punnathanam, S., Broadbelt, L.J., Hupp, J.T., and Snurr, R.Q.: Separation of CO2 from CH4 using mixed-ligand metal-organic frameworks. Langmuir 24, 8592 (2008).Google Scholar
Zhao, Z., Li, Z., and Lin, Y.S.: Adsorption and diffusion of carbon dioxide on metal-organic framework (MOF-5). Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48, 10015 (2009).Google Scholar
Zhao, C.W., Chen, X.P., Zhao, C.S., and Liu, Y.K.: Carbonation and hydration characteristics of dry potassium-based sorbents for CO2 capture. Energy Fuels 23, 1766 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yi, C.K., Jo, S.H., Seo, Y., Lee, J.B., and Ryu, C.K.: Continuous operation of the potassium-based dry sorbent CO2 capture process with two fluidized-bed reactors. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 1, 31 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansón, A., Callejas, M.A., Benito, A.M., Maser, W.K., Izquierdo, M.T., and Rubio, B.: Hydrogen adsorption studies on single wall carbon nanotubes. Carbon 42, 1243 (2004).Google Scholar
Yang, Z.X., Du, G.D., Guo, Z.P., Yu, X.B., Chen, Z., Zhang, P., Chen, G., and Liu, H.: Easy preparation of SnO2@carbon composite nanofibers with improved lithium ion storage properties. J. Mater. Res. 25, 1516 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevilla, M. and Fuertes, A.B.: Sustainable porous carbons with a superior performance for CO2 capture. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 1765 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falco, C., Marco-Lozar, J.P., Salinas-Torres, D., Morallon, E., Cazorla-Amoros, D., Titirici, M.M., and Lozano-Castello, D.: Tailoring the porosity of chemically activated hydrothermal carbons: Influence of precursor and hydrothermal carbonization temperature. Carbon 62, 346 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, X.Z., Zeng, M.F., and Qi, C.: One-step synthesis of carbon functionalized with sulfonic acid groups using hydrothermal carbonization. Carbon 48, 1844 (2010).Google Scholar
Wang, R., Li, W., and Liu, S.X.: A porous carbon foam prepared from liquefied birch sawdust. J. Mater. Sci. 47, 1977 (2012).Google Scholar
Xiao, L.P., Shi, Z.J., Xu, F., and Sun, R.C.: Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 118, 619 (2012).Google Scholar
Li, M., Li, W., and Liu, S.X.: Control of the morphology and chemical properties of carbon spheres prepared from glucose by a hydrothermal method. J. Mater. Res. 27, 1117 (2012).Google Scholar
Lv, Y.Y., Zhang, F., Dou, Y.Q., Zhai, Y.P., Wang, J.X., and Liu, H.J.: A comprehensive study on KOH activation of ordered mesoporous carbons and their supercapacitor application. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 93 (2012).Google Scholar
Baccar, R., Bouzid, J., Feki, M., and Montiel, A.: Preparation of activated carbon from Tunisian olive-waste cakes and its application for adsorption of heavy metal ions. J. Hazard. Mater. 162, 1525 (2009).Google Scholar
Wang, L.L., Guo, Y.P., Zou, B., and Wang, Z.C.: High surface area porous carbons prepared from hydrochars by phosphoric acid activation. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 1947 (2011).Google Scholar
Song, J., Shen, W.Z., Wang, J.G., and Fan, W.B.: Superior carbon-based CO2 adsorbents prepared from poplar anthers. Carbon 69, 255 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevilla, M., Falco, C., Titirici, M.M., and Fuertes, A.B.: High-performance CO2 sorbents from algae. RSC Adv. 2, 12792 (2012).Google Scholar
Falco, C., Sieben, J.M., Brun, N., Sevilla, M., van der Mauelen, T., Morallon, E., Cazorla-Amoros, D., and Titirici, M.M.: Hydrothermal carbons from hemicelluloses-derived aqueous hydrolysis products as electrode materials for supercapacitors. ChemSusChem 6, 374 (2013).Google Scholar
Alcaniz-Monge, J. and Illan-Gomez, M.J.: Insight into hydroxides-activated coals: Chemical or physical activation?. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 318, 35 (2008).Google Scholar
Raymundo-pinero, E., Azais, P., Cacciaguerra, T., Cazorla-Amoros, D., Linares-Solano, A., and Beguin, F.: KOH and NaOH activation mechanism of multiwalled carbon nanotubes with different structural organization. Carbon 43, 786 (2005).Google Scholar
de Souza, L.K.C., Wickramaratne, N.P., Ello, A.S., Costa, M.J.F., da Costa, C.E.F., and Jaroniec, M.: Enhancement of CO2 adsorption on phenolic resin-based mesoporous carbons by KOH activation. Carbon 65, 334 (2013).Google Scholar
Lozano-Castello, D., Calo, J.M., Cazorla-Amoros, D., and Linares-Solano, A.: Carbon activation with KOH as explores by temperature programmed techniques, and the effect of hydrogen. Carbon 45, 2529 (2007).Google Scholar
Ding, L.L., Zou, B., Liu, H.Q., Li, Y.N., Wang, Z.C., Su, Y., Guo, Y.P., and Wang, X.F.A new route for conversion of corncob to porous carbon by hydrolysis and activation. Chem. Eng. J. 225, 300 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casco, M.E., Martinez-Escandell, M., Silvestre-Albero, J., and Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.: Effect of the porous structure in carbon materials for CO2 capture at atmospheric and high-pressure. Carbon 67, 230 (2014).Google Scholar
Dawson, R., Stockel, E., Holst, J.R., Adams, D.J., and Cooper, A.I.: Microporous organic polymers for carbon dioxide capture. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 4239 (2011).Google Scholar
Liu, Q.L., Pham, T., Porosoff, M.D., and Lobo, R.F.: ZK-5: A CO2-selective zeolite with high working capacity at ambient temperature and pressure. ChemSusChem 5, 2237 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, C. and Ahn, W.S.: CO2 capture using mesoporous alumina prepared by a sol-gel process. Chem. Eng. J. 166, 646 (2011).Google Scholar