Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:44:11.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ossicular Implants (Prosthesis) – from Infancy to Maturity

Presenting Author: Mario Milkov

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2016

Mario Milkov
Affiliation:
Prof. Paraskev Stoyanov Medical University of Varna Faculty of Dental Medicine
Georgi Marinov
Affiliation:
Prof. Paraskev Stoyanov Medical University of Varna Faculty of Dental Medicine
Robert Guidoin
Affiliation:
Laval University, Quebec, Canada
Stefan Mirchev
Affiliation:
Medical University of Pleven, Bulgaria
Hamaputra Vijayendra
Affiliation:
Vijaya E.N.T. care Centre, Belgaum, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstracts
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2016 

Learning Objectives: The idea of ossicular chain reconstruction emerges and develops as a result from the creation of Wulstein and Zollner's concept of tympanoplasty. Initially, doing the ossicular reconstruction a transposition of incus mainly is performed. Bone or cartilage material has been used as a material. In 1956 Wulstein reported the use of a vinyl-acrylic device as acoustic transmitter between the mobile footplate and the tympanic membrane graft. However, the results were poor. Shea moved from the concept of a graft to that of a bioprosthesis. Shea first began a successful series of ossicular reconstructions. Shea first implanted Teflon prosthesis on a 48-year-old female patient who had widespread otosclerosis, throughout the oval window rim and footplate. As a result, the patient's hearing improved. Today the implantation of ossicular prostheses to replace non-functional and pathologically altered ossicular chain is a well-accepted surgical technique. The limited graft applications in the reconstructive auditory-chain surgery stimulated the search for new prosthetic medical device. Several questions are of paramount interest for solving this problem: 1. Biomaterial selection for the ossicular implants (prosthesis) construction; 2. Design of the ossicular implants (prosthesis); 3. Validation of the ossicular implants (prosthesis); 4. Monitoring of the patients with implanted ossicular prostheses. In modern otosurgery, a large variety of biomaterials were made use. None of them is, however, useful for any applications. In general, the biomaterials used for ossicular chain reconstruction should possess a good biocompatibility and biostability. They must be well osteointegrated, with minimal risk of ankylosis. Surface properties, particularly structural characteristics, critically influence the quality of the implant-biological interface. The biomaterials need to be easily processed and retain their shape already acquired. A proper sound transmission requires biomaterials of low mass and high hardness. None of them is, however, useful for any applications. In the literature available, usage of different animals for biomaterial validations has been reported. In experiments on the guinea pigs bulla mastoidea model, introduced in the experimental medical practice from Assoc. Prof. Mario Milkov, MD, Ph.D., gold, Teflon, hydroxyapatite, and ceromer were used convincing us in the good qualities of the guinea pig to serve as a model for testing the ossicular prostheses.

The idea of ossicular chain reconstruction emerges and develops as a result from the creation of Wulstein and Zollner's concept of tympanoplasty. Initially, doing the ossicular reconstruction a transposition of incus mainly is performed. Bone or cartilage material has been used as a material. In 1956 Wulstein reported the use of a vinyl-acrylic device as acoustic transmitter between the mobile footplate and the tympanic membrane graft.Shea first began a successful series of ossicular reconstructions. Today the implantation of ossicular prostheses to replace non-functional and pathologically altered ossicular chain is a well-accepted surgical technique. The limited graft applications in the reconstructive auditory-chain surgery stimulated the search for new prosthetic medical device. Several questions are of paramount interest for solving this problem:

  1. 1. Biomaterial selection for the ossicular implants (prosthesis) construction;

  2. 2. Design of the ossicular implants (prosthesis);

  3. 3. Validation of the ossicular implants (prosthesis);

  4. 4. Monitoring of the patients with implanted ossicular prostheses.

In modern otosurgery, a large variety of biomaterials were made use. None of them is, however, useful for any applications. In general, the biomaterials used for ossicular chain reconstruction should possess a good biocompatibility and biostability. Surface properties, particularly structural characteristics, critically influence the quality of the implant-biological interface. The biomaterials need to be easily processed and retain their shape already acquired. A proper sound transmission requires biomaterials of low mass and high hardness. None of them is, however, useful for any applications. In the literature available, usage of different animals for biomaterial validations has been reported. In experiments on the guinea pigs bulla mastoidea model, introduced in the experimental medical practice.