Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:40:45.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contralateral auditory brainstem response abnormalities in acoustic neuroma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

D. A. Moffat*
Affiliation:
Cambridge
D. M. Baguley
Affiliation:
Cambridge
D. G. Hardy
Affiliation:
Cambridge
Y. N. Tsui
Affiliation:
Cambridge
*
D. A. Moffat F.R.C.S., Department of Otolaryngology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ

Abstract

Contralateral Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) findings in a series of 79 patients with unilateral acoustic neuroma are presented. Sixty-four patients (81 per cent) had a normal contralateral ABR, thirteen (16.4 per cent) had latency abnormalities contralaterally and in two patients (206 per cent) no consistent responses could be recorded despite good hearing. Abnormalities in the contralateral ABR were analysed and five patients had abnormal III-V interwave intervals, in seven patients the I-III intervals were abnormal and in one patient, only the fifth wave was present and of abnormal latency. The tumour size was assessed by computed axial tomography (CT) and the relationship between tumour size and contralateral ABR findings established. Large tumours (>2.5 cm.) were associated with contralateral ABR abnormalities in 25.6 per cent of the patients, medium tumours (1.0-2.5 cm.) with ABR abnormalities in 14 per cent and there were no abnormalities in the small group (intracanalicular). The implications for interpretation of ABR recordings contralateral to an acoustic neuroma are discussed in relation to brainstem compression and its effect on the wave generator sites.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baguley, D. M., Moffat, D. A. and Nigam, A. (1988) Disposable electrodes in audiometory. British Journal of Audiology, 22, 3, 219222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrs, D. M., Brackmann, D. E., Olson, J. E. and House, W. F. (1985) Changing concepts of acoustic neuroma diagnosis. Archives of Otolaryngology, 111: 1721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bridger, M. W. M. and Farkashidy, J. (1980) The distribution of neuroglia and Schwann cells in the VIIIth nerve of man. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 94: 13531362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croxson, G. R., Moffat, D. A. and Baguley, D. M. (1988) Bruns bidirectional nystagmus in cerebellopontine angle tumours. Clinical Otolaryngology, 13: 153157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, J. W. (1983) Auditory brainstem response audiometry. In Jerger, J. (ed), Hearing disorders in adults: current trends. College Hill Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. W. and Selters, W. A. (1987) Audiological evaluation for neurotological diagnosis. In House, J. W. and O'Connor, A. F. (eds) Handbook of Neurotological Diagnosis, Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, p. 6582.Google Scholar
Lynne, G. E. and Verma, N. P. (1985) ABR in upper brainstem lesions. In Jacobson, J. T. (ed) The auditory brainstem response, Taylor and Francis, London, p. 203218.Google Scholar
Moffat, D. A., Hardy, D. G., Baguley, D. M. (1989) The strategy and benefits of acoustic neuroma searching. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 103: 5159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moller, M. B. and Moller, A. R. (1983) Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in patients with cerebellopontine angle tumours. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 92: 645650.Google Scholar
Musiek, F. E. (1982) ABR In eighth nerve and brainstem disorders. American Journal of Otology, 3, 3: 243248.Google Scholar
Musiek, F. E. and Kibbe, K. (1986) Auditory brainstem response wave IV-V abnormalities form the ear opposite large cerebellopontine lesions. American Journal of Otology, 7, 4: 253257.Google Scholar
Nodar, R. H. and Kinney, S. E. (1980) The contralateral effects of large tumours on brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Laryngoscope, 90: 17621768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfleiderer, A. G., Evans, K. L., Grace, A. R. H. and Lloyd, G. A. S. (1988) A screening protocol used for the detection of acoustic neuromas: a clinical evaluation. Clinical Otolaryngology, 13: 145151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenhamer, H. (1981) ABR in cerebellopontine angle tumours. Scandinavian Audiology, Supplement 13: 116.Google Scholar
Selters, W. and Brackmann, D. (1977) Acoustic tumour detection with brainstem electric response audiometry. Archives of Otolaryngology, 103: 181187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zapulla, R. A., Greenblat, E. and Karmel, B. Z. (1982) The effects of acoustic neuromas on ipsilateral and contralateral brainstem auditory evoked potentials during stimulation of the unaffected ear. American Journal of Otology, 4: 118122.Google Scholar