Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:55:16.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Foreign body reaction mimicking a second primary tumour of the oesophagus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2007

J Pollock  and
N Beasley
J Pollock
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
N Beasley*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr Nigel Beasley, Consultant Head and Neck Surgeon, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. Fax: 0115 970 9748 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To present a significant complication of pharyngolaryngeal reconstruction, which resulted in diagnostic confusion as it mimicked a second primary tumour of the head and neck.

Methods:

Case report and review of the world literature.

Case report:

A 61-year-old man developed a granulomatous foreign body reaction, mimicking a second primary tumour, at the distal end of a salivary bypass tube, following pharyngolaryngectomy and reconstruction using a tubed anterolateral thigh flap. Clinically and radiologically, this was felt to represent a second primary tumour of the oesophagus, but biopsies revealed full thickness inflammation of the mucosa and granulation tissue. Repeat oesophagoscopy two weeks after removal of the tube showed complete resolution.

Conclusion:

No record of an oesophageal foreign body reaction to a Montgomery salivary bypass tube has previously been reported in the world literature. This report highlights the potential for such a lesion to cause diagnostic confusion with a second primary tumour.

Keywords

GranulomaForeign Body ReactionSecond Primary NeoplasmOesophagus
Type
Clinical Records
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 122 , Issue 12 , December 2008 , pp. 1401 - 1403
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Leon, X, Ferlito, A, Myer, CM, Saffioti, U, Shaha, AR, Bradley, PJ et al. Second primary tumors in head and neck cancer patients. Acta Otolaryngol 2002;122:765–78CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Houghton, DJ, Hughes, ML, Garvey, C, Beasley, NJ, Hamilton, JW, Gerlinger, I et al. Role of chest CT scanning in the management of patients presenting with head and neck cancer. Head Neck 1998;20:614–183.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Varvares, MA, Cheney, ML, Gliklich, RE, Boyd, JM, Goldsmith, T, Lazor, J et al. Use of the radial forearm fasciocutaneous free flap and Montgomery salivary bypass tube for pharyngoesophageal reconstruction. Head Neck 1999;22:463–83.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Laor, T, Barnewolt, CE. Nonradiopaque penetrating foreign body: “a sticky situation”. Pediatr Radiol 1999;29:702–4Google Scholar
5Mayoral, W, Fleischer, D, Salcedo, S, Roy, P, Al-Kawas, F, Benjamin, S. Non malignant obstruction is a common problem with metal stents in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:556–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Kyriakou, G, Kalahanis, N, Kyrouli-Voulgari, A, Zeras, A, Mitropoulos, D. Extravesical foreign body presenting as a bladder tumor. Urol Int 2000;65:224–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Bhalla, RK, Murphy, J, Jones, TM, Roland, NJ. Foreign body reaction to calcium alginate fibre mimicking recurrent tumour of the submandibular salivary gland. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;40:172–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed