Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:07:25.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing the Unterberger test: introduction of a novel smartphone application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2014

M Whittaker ,
A Mathew ,
R Kanani  and
R G Kanegaonkar
M Whittaker*
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, East Sussex, UK
A Mathew
Affiliation:
King's College Medical School, London, UK
R Kanani
Affiliation:
King's College Medical School, London, UK
R G Kanegaonkar
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr M Whittaker, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Eastern Road, Brighton BN2 5BE, East Sussex, UK E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Peripheral vestibular function is commonly assessed using the Unterberger test. Patients are asked to march on the spot and their extent of rotation is recorded. The sensitivity of this test depends on an assessor accurately estimating the degree of rotation. This study therefore aimed to compare observer estimates with a smartphone application (DplusR Balance) that accurately records rotation.

Method:

Twenty-five participants were asked to estimate the degree of rotation in 10 successive Unterberger tests performed by a volunteer.

Results:

The average difference between estimated and application recorded extent of rotation was 30°.

Conclusion:

Assessors poorly estimate the degree of rotation in this clinical test, to an extent sufficient to affect clinical interpretation and diagnosis. We recommend the use of this application or alternative methods to record the degree of rotation in patients.

Keywords

Postural BalanceVertigoPhysical ExaminationVestibular Apparatus
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 128 , Issue 11 , November 2014 , pp. 958 - 960
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented as a poster at 9th British Society of Neuro-Otology meeting, 11 October 2013, London, UK

References

1Grommes, C, Conway, D. The stepping test: a step back in history. J Hist Neurosci 2011;20:29–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Bonanni, M, Newton, R. Test–retest reliability of the Fukuda Stepping Test. Physioth Res Int 1998;3:58–68Google Scholar
3Honakar, JA, Shepard, NT. Fukuda stepping test: sensitivity and specificity. J Am Acad Audiol 2009;20:311–14Google Scholar
4Hickey, SA, Ford, GR, Buckley, JG, Fitzgerald O'Connor, A. Unterberger stepping test: a useful indicator of peripheral vestibular dysfunction? J Laryngol Otol 1990;104:599–602CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed