Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:39:38.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

(F.) Brommer Die Giebel des Parthenon. Eine Einführung. Main: Philipp von Zabern. 1959. Pp. 52. 40 plates. DM 10.80. - (P. E.) Corbett The Sculpture of the Parthenon. (King Penguin Books, 76.) Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. 1959. Pp. 39. 40 plates. 7 text figures. 5s.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notices of Books
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cf. Brommer, , AM 69/70 (1954/1955), p. 55Google Scholar f. and Taf. VII.

2 Cf. AM 69/70 (1954/1955). pp. 50–60; AM 71 (1956), p. 237 f.

3 Such as ‘a snake or an attribute’ (AM, 69/70, p. 60).

4 AM 71, Beil. 129. In the same article, p. 237 and n. 17a, Brommer adduces a drawing by H. W. Williams, dating from 1813–1818, as ‘confirming’ Smirke; in this the fragment certainly looks more like a sculpture, but does not seem to be in the same position as that in which Smirke saw it.

5 How uninterested Smirke was in the contents of the pediments, as opposed to the architecture, can be seen from his sketchy and distorted rendering of the ‘Cecrops’.

6 In the regular Parthenon attitude for this movement; cf. North Frieze, Slabs XI, no. 43, and XVII, no. 58 (indistinguishable in attitude from the pedimental Athena, so far as she is preserved); West Frieze, Slab XIV, no. 27.

7 So most recently Fuchs, W., die Vorbilder der neuattischen Reliefs (1959), pp. 142–3.Google Scholar