Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T00:29:25.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward an understanding of supersonic modes in boundary-layer transition for hypersonic flow over blunt cones

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2018

Clifton H. Mortensen Open the ORCID record for Clifton H. Mortensen [Opens in a new window]
Clifton H. Mortensen*
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Realistic flight vehicles for reentry into the Earth’s atmosphere are commonly similar to blunted cones. The main reason for blunting a cone is to mitigate high heat loads at the nose. Another reason for blunting the cone is to delay boundary-layer transition. It is commonly understood that the second mode is damped in flow over a cone as the nose radius is increased. This is thought to lead to the delay in transition. Here, a blunted cone at a realistic reentry trajectory point with significant real-gas effects is studied. It is shown, using linear stability theory and direct numerical simulation, that there exist multiple unstable modal instabilities in the boundary layer. One of these modal instabilities is called the supersonic mode, as its phase velocity is supersonic relative to the flow velocity at the edge of the boundary layer. Its growth rate is found to increase with increasing nose radius until a certain nose radius is reached. After this radius, any further increase in nose radius decreases its growth rate. There is adequate agreement between theory and direct numerical simulation for the growth rate, phase velocity and eigenfunction of the supersonic mode. At the reentry conditions tested, the supersonic mode is more likely the cause of boundary-layer transition than the second mode for blunted cones with a small wall-temperature ratio. Initial parametric studies confirm that a decrease in wall temperature amplifies the supersonic mode. Also, the supersonic mode’s growth rate is shown to be a maximum when its phase velocity is aligned with the flow velocity.

JFM classification

Aerodynamics: Aerodynamics Boundary Layers: Boundary layer stability Aerodynamics: High-speed flow
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 846 , 10 July 2018 , pp. 789 - 814
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2018 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bitter, N. & Shepherd, J. 2015 Stability of highly cooled hypervelocity boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 778, 586–620.Google Scholar
Blottner, F., Johnson, M. & Ellis, M.1971 Chemically reacting gas viscous flow program for multi-component gas mixtures. SC-RR–70-754, Sandia National Laboratories.Google Scholar
Chang, C., Vinh, H. & Malik, M.1997 Hypersonic boundary-layer stability with chemical reactions using PSE. AIAA Paper 1997-2012.Google Scholar
Fedorov, A. & Khokhlov, A. 2001 Prehistory of instability in a hypersonic boundary layer. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 14 (6), 359–375.Google Scholar
Fong, K., Wang, X., Huang, Y., Zhong, X., McKiernan, G., Fisher, R. & Schneider, S. 2015 Second mode suppression in hypersonic boundary layer by roughness: design and experiments. AIAA J. 53 (10), 3138–3144.Google Scholar
Hudson, M.1996 Linear stability theory of hypersonic, chemically reacting viscous flow. PhD thesis, North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
Johnson, H., Seipp, T. & Candler, G. 1998 Numerical study of hypersonic reacting boundary layer transition on cones. Phys. Fluids 10 (10), 2676–2685.Google Scholar
Lee, J. 1985 Basic governing equations for the flight regimes of aeroassisted orbital transfer vehicles. In Thermal Design of Aeroassisted Orbital Transfer Vehicles (ed. Nelson, H. F.), vol. 96, pp. 3–53. AIAA.Google Scholar
Lees, L. & Lin, C.1946 Investigation of the stability of the laminar boundary layer in a compressible fluid. NACA TN no. 1115.Google Scholar
Lei, J. & Zhong, X. 2012 Linear stability analysis of nose bluntness effects on hypersonic boundary layer transition. AIAA J. 49 (1), 24–37.Google Scholar
Mack, L.1969 Boundary-layer stability theory. Report 900-277, Rev. A. Jet Propulsion Lab, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA.Google Scholar
Mack, L.1984 Boundary layer linear stability theory. AGARD Rep. No. 709.Google Scholar
Mack, L. 1987 Review of linear compressible stability theory. In Stability of Time Dependent and Spatially Varying Flows, pp. 164–187. Springer.Google Scholar
Malik, M. 2003 Hypersonic flight transition data analysis using parabolized stability equations with chemistry effects. J. Spacecr. Rockets 40 (3), 332–344.Google Scholar
Malik, M., Spall, R. & Chang, C.1990 Effect of nose bluntness on boundary layer stability and transition. AIAA Paper 90-0112.Google Scholar
Mortensen, C. H.2016 Effects of thermochemical nonequilibrium on hypersonic boundary-layer instability in the presence of surface ablation or isolated two-dimensional roughness. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Mortensen, C. H. & Zhong, X. 2014 Simulation of second-mode instability in a real-gas hypersonic flow with graphite ablation. AIAA J. 52 (8), 1632–1652.Google Scholar
Mortensen, C. H. & Zhong, X.2015 Numerical simulation of hypersonic boundary-layer instability in a real gas with two-dimensional surface roughness. AIAA Paper 2015-3077.Google Scholar
Mortensen, C. H. & Zhong, X. 2016 Real-gas and surface-ablation effects on hypersonic boundary-layer instability over a blunt cone. AIAA J. 54 (3), 980–998.Google Scholar
Park, C. 1990 Nonequilibrium Hypersonic Aerothermodynamics. Wiley.Google Scholar
Schneider, S. 2004 Hypersonic laminar–turbulent transition on circular cones and scramjet forebodies. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 40 (1), 1–50.Google Scholar
Softley, E.1968 Transition of the hypersonic boundary layer on a cone: part II – experiments at $M=10$ and more on blunt cone transition. Tech. Rep. R68SD14, General Electric Co.Google Scholar
Stetson, K.1983 Nosetip bluntness effects on cone frustum boundary layer transition in hypersonic flow. AIAA Paper 1983-1763.Google Scholar
Stetson, K. & Rushton, G. 1967 Shock tunnel investigation of boundary-layer transition at M = 5. 5. AIAA J. 5 (5), 899–906.Google Scholar
Stetson, K., Thompson, E., Donaldson, J. & Siler, L.1984 Laminar boundary layer stability experiments on a cone at Mach 8, part 2: blunt cone. AIAA Paper 1984-0006.Google Scholar
Wilke, C. 1950 A viscosity equation for gas mixtures. J. Chem. Phys. 18 (4), 517–519.Google Scholar
Zhong, X. 1998 High-order finite-difference schemes for numerical simulation of hypersonic boundary-layer transition. J. Comput. Phys. 144 (2), 662–709.Google Scholar