Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:24:51.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stabilization and destabilization of turbulent shear flow in a rotating fluid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

D. J. Tritton
D. J. Tritton
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Newcastle upon Tyne. NE1. 7RU. UK Present address: Institut de Mécanique de Grenoble, Domaine Universitaire, B. P. 53X, 38041 Grenoble, France.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider turbulent shear flows in a rotating fluid, with the rotation axis parallel or antiparallel to the mean flow vorticity. It is already known that rotation such that the shear becomes cyclonic is stabilizing (with reference to the non-rotating case), whereas the opposite rotation is destabilizing for low rotation rates and restabilizing for higher. The arguments leading to and quantifying these statement are heuristic. Their status and limitations require clarification. Also, it is useful to formulate them in ways that permit direct comparison of the underlying concepts with experimental data.

An extension of a displaced particle analysis, given by Tritton & Davies (1981) indicates changes with the rotation rate of the orientation of the motion directly generated by the shear/Coriolis instability occurring in the destabilized range.

The ‘simplified Reynolds stress equations scheme’, proposed by Johnston, Halleen & Lezius (1972), has been reformulated in terms of two angles, representing the orientation of the principal axes of the Reynolds stress tensor (αa) and the orientation of the Reynolds stress generating processes (αb), that are approximately equal according to the scheme. The scheme necessarily fails at large rotation rates because of internal inconsistency, additional to the fact that it is inapplicable to two-dimensional turbulence. However, it has a wide range of potential applicability, which may be tested with experimental data. αa and αb have been evaluated from numerical data for homogeneous shear flow (Bertoglio 1982) and laboratory data for a wake (Witt & Joubert 1985) and a free shear layer (Bidokhti & Tritton 1992). The trends with varying rotation rate are notably similar for the three cases. There is a significant range of near equality of αa and αb. An extension of the scheme, allowing for evolution of the flow, relates to the observation of energy transfer from the turbulence to the mean flow.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 241 , August 1992 , pp. 503 - 523
Copyright
© 1992 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alfredsson, P. H. & Persson H. 1989 J. Fluid Mech. 202, 543.
Andersson, H. I. & Nilsen P. J. 1989a Norwegian Inst. Tech., Div. Appl. Mech., Rep. 89:01.
Andersson, H. I. & Nilsen P. J. 1989b ASME Fluids Engng Spring Conf., San Diego: Forum on Turbulent Flows.
Aupoix B. 1987 AGARD Rep. 755, 3–1.
Bertoglio J. P. 1982 Am. Inst. Aero. Astro. J. 20, 1175.
Bertoglio J. P., Charnay G., Gence, J. N. & Mathieu J. 1978 C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris A 286, 957.
Bertoglio J. P., Charnay, G. & Mathieu J. 1980 J. MeAc. Appl. 4, 421.
Bidokhti, A. A. & Tritton D. J. 1990 University of Newcastle upon Tyne. Dept. Phys., Rep. GFD 90/1.
Bidokhti, A. A. & Tritton D. J. 1992 J. Fluid Mech. 241, 469.
Bradshaw P. 1969 J. Fluid Mech. 36, 177.
Cousteix, J. & Aupoix B. 1982 Rotation and curvature effects on Reynolds stresses in boundary layers. ONERA Rep.Google Scholar
Hide R. 1977 Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 103, 1.
Johnston J. P., Halleen, R. M. & Lezius D. K. 1972 J. Fluid Mech. 56, 533.
Lakshminarayana B. 1986 Am. Inst. Aero. Astro. J. 24, 1900.
Launder B. E., Tselepidakis, D. P. & Younis B. A. 1987 J. Fluid Mech. 183, 63.
Lesieur M., Yanase, S. & MeAtais O. 1991 Phys. Fluids A 3, 403.
Rose, W. G. 1966 J. Fluid Mech. 25, 97.
Savill A. M. 1987 Ann. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 19, 531.
Speziale C. G. 1989 Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 1, 3.
Speziale C. G., Sarkar, S. & Gatski T. B. 1990 NASA Contractor Rep., ICASE Rep. 90–5.
Townsend A. A. 1976 J. Fluid Mech. 41, 13.
Townsend A. A. 1976 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.
Townsend A. A. 1980 J. Fluid Mech. 98, 171.
Tritton D. J. 1978 In Rotating Fluids in Geophysics (ed. P.H. Roberts & A. M. Soward), p. 105. Academic.
Tritton D. J. 1981 Phys. Fluids 24, 1921.
Tritton, D. J. & Davies P. A. 1981 In Hydrodynamic Instabilities and the Transition to Turbulence (ed. H. L. Swinney & J. P. Gollub), p. 229. Springer.
Warfield, M. J. & Lakshminarayana B. 1987 Am. Inst. Aero. Astro. J. 25, 957.
Watmuff J. H., Witt, H. T. & Joubert P. N. 1985 J. Fluid Mech. 157, 405.
Witt H. T. 1986 Effects of rotation on turbulent boundary layers and wakes. Ph.D. thesis. University of Melbourne.
Witt, H. T. & Joubert P. N. 1985 Proc. 5th Symp. on Turbulent shear flows. Cornell Univ., p. 21, 25.