Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:03:07.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stability of flow through deformable channels and tubes: implications of consistent formulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2018

Ramkarn Patne
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, 208016, India
V. Shankar*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, 208016, India
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

The present study is aimed at assessing the existing results concerning the stability of canonical shear flows in channels and tubes with deformable walls, in light of consistent formulations of the nonlinear solid constitutive model and linearised interface conditions at the fluid–solid interface. We show that a class of unstable shear-wave modes at low Reynolds number, predicted by previous studies for pressure-driven flows through neo-Hookean tubes and channels, is absent upon use of consistent interfacial conditions. Furthermore, we analyse the consequences of the change in solid model on the stability of the canonical shear flows by using both neo-Hookean and Mooney–Rivlin models. We show that the salient features of the stability of the system are adequately captured by a consistent formulation of the neo-Hookean solid model, thus precluding the need to employ more detailed solid models. The stability analysis of planar flows past a neo-Hookean solid subjected to three-dimensional disturbances showed that two-dimensional disturbances are more unstable than the corresponding three-dimensional disturbances within the consistent formulations. We show that prior inconsistent formulations of the solid constitutive equation predict a physically spurious spanwise instability in disagreement with experiments thereby demonstrating their inapplicability to predict instabilities in flow past deformable solid surfaces. Using the consistent formulation, the present work provides an accurate picture, over a range of Reynolds numbers, of the stability of canonical shear flows through deformable channels and tubes. Importantly, it is shown how inconsistencies in either the bulk constitutive relation or in the linearisation of the interface conditions can separately lead to physically spurious instabilities. The predictions of this work are relevant to experimental studies in flow through deformable tubes and channels in the low and moderate Reynolds number regime.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© 2018 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenbach, D. J. 1973 Wave Propagation in Elastic Solids. North-Holland.Google Scholar
Anand, L. 1986 Moderate dformations in extension-torsion of incopmressible isotropic elastic materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 34, 293304.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. & Gill, A. E. 1962 Analysis of the stability of axisymmetric jets. J. Fluid Mech. 14, 529551.Google Scholar
Benjamin, B. 1963 The threefold classification for unstable disturbances in flexible surfaces bounding inviscid flows. J. Fluid Mech. 16, 436450.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1957 Wave formation in laminar flow down an inclined plane. J. Fluid Mech. 2, 554574.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1960 Effect of a flexible surface on boundary layer stability. J. Fluid Mech. 9, 513532.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. P. 2001 Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods, 2nd edn. Dover.Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. W. & Garrad, A. D. 1985 The hydrodynamic stability of flows over kramer-type compliant surfaces. Part 1. Tollmien-Schlichting instabilities. J. Fluid Mech. 155, 465510.Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. W. & Garrad, A. D. 1986 The hydrodynamic stability of flows over kramer-type compliant surfaces. Part 2. Flow induced surface instabilities. J. Fluid Mech. 170, 199232.Google Scholar
Chokshi, P. & Kumaran, V. 2008a Weakly nonlinear analysis of viscous instability in flow past a neo-Hookean surface. Phys. Rev. E 77, 056303.Google Scholar
Chokshi, P. & Kumaran, V. 2008b Weakly nonlinear stability analysis of a flow past a neo-Hookean solid at arbitrary Reynolds numbers. Phys. Fluids 20, 094109.Google Scholar
Davies, C. & Carpenter, P. W. 1997 Instabilities in a plane channel flow between compliant walls. J. Fluid Mech. 352, 205243.Google Scholar
Drazin, P. G. & Reid, W. H. 1981 Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drazin, P. G. & Howard, L. N. 1966 Hydrodynamic stability of parallel flow of a inviscid fluid. In Adv. Appl. Mech. (ed. Chernyi, G. G.), vol. 9, pp. 190. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Eggert, M. D. & Kumar, S. 2004 Observations of instability, hysterisis, and oscillation in low-Reynolds number flow past polymer gels. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 278, 234242.Google Scholar
Gajjar, J. S. B. & Sibanda, P. 1996 The hydrodynamic stability of channel flow with compliant boundaries. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 8, 105129.Google Scholar
Gaurav & Shankar, V. 2009 Stability of fluid flow through deformable neo-Hookean tubes. J. Fluid Mech. 627, 291322.Google Scholar
Gaurav & Shankar, V. 2010 Stability of pressure-driven flow in a deformable neo-Hookean channel. J. Fluid Mech. 659, 318350.Google Scholar
Giribabu, D. & Shankar, V. 2017 Stability of plane Couette flow of a power-law fluid past a neo-Hookean solid at arbitrary Reynolds number. Phys. Fluids 29, 074106.Google Scholar
Gkanis, V. & Kumar, S. 2003 Instability of creeping couette flow past a neo-Hookean solid. Phys. Fluids 15, 28642871.Google Scholar
Gkanis, V. & Kumar, S. 2005 Stabilty of pressure-driven creeping flows in channels lined with a nonlinear elastic solid. J. Fluid Mech. 524, 357375.Google Scholar
Grotberg, J. B. & Jensen, O. E. 2004 Biofluid mechanics in flexible tubes. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 121147.Google Scholar
Hains, F. D. & Price, J. F. 1962 Effect of a flexible wall on the stability of Poiseuille flow. Phys. Fluids 5, 365.Google Scholar
Holzapfel, G. A. 2000 Nonlinear Solid Mechanics. Wiley.Google Scholar
Joseph, D. D. & Saut, J. C. 1990 Short-wave instabilities and ill-posed initial value problems. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 1, 191227.Google Scholar
Krindel, P. & Silberberg, A. 1979 Flow through gel-walled tubes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 71, 3450.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V. 1995a Stability of the flow of a fluid through a flexible tube at high Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 302, 117139.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V. 1995b Stability of the viscous flow of a fluid through a flexible tube. J. Fluid Mech. 294, 259281.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V. 2000 Classification of instabilities in the flow past flexible surfaces. Curr. Sci. 79, 766773.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V. 2015 Experimental studies on the flow through soft tubes and channels. Sadhana 40, 911923.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V., Fredrickson, G. H. & Pincus, P. 1994 Flow induced instability of the interface between a fluid and a gel at low Reynolds number. J. Phys. II Paris 4, 893904.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V. & Muralikrishnan, R. 2000 Spontaneous growth of fluctuations in the viscous flow of a fluid past a soft interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 33103313.Google Scholar
Macosko, C. W. 1994 Rheology: Principles, Measurements, and Applications. VCH.Google Scholar
Malvern, L. E. 1969 Introduction to the Mechanics of a Continuous Medium. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Neelamegam, R., Giribabu, D. & Shankar, V. 2014 Instability of viscous flow over a deformable two-layered gel: experiment and theory. Phys. Rev. E 90, 043004.Google Scholar
Neelamegam, R. & Shankar, V. 2015 Experimental study of the instability of laminar flow in a tube with deformable walls. Phys. Fluids 27, 024102.Google Scholar
Neelmegam, R., Giribabu, D. & Shankar, V. 2014 Instability of viscous flow over a deformable two-layered gel: experiment and theory. Phys Rev E 90, 043004.Google Scholar
Patne, R., Giribabu, D. & Shankar, V. 2017 Consistent formulations for stability of fluid flow through deformable channels and tubes. J. Fluid Mech. 827, 3166.Google Scholar
Patne, R. & Shankar, V. 2017 Absolute and convective instability in combined Couette-Poiseuille flow past a neo-Hookean solid. Phys. Fluids 29, 124104.Google Scholar
Shankar, V. 2015 Stability of fluid flow through deformable tubes and channels: an overview. Sadhana 40, 925943.Google Scholar
Shankar, V. & Kumaran, V. 1999 Stability of non-parabolic flow in a flexible tube. J. Fluid Mech. 395, 211236.Google Scholar
Shankar, V. & Kumaran, V. 2000 Stability of fluid flow in a flexible tube to non-axisymmetric disturbances. J. Fluid Mech. 408, 291314.Google Scholar
Shankar, V. & Kumaran, V. 2002 Stability of wall modes in fluid flow past a flexible surface. Phys. Fluids 14, 23242338.Google Scholar
Shrivastava, A., Cussler, E. L. & Kumar, S. 2008 Mass transfer enhancement due to a soft elastic boundary. Chem. Engng Sci. 63, 43024305.Google Scholar
Srinivas, S. S. & Kumaran, V. 2017 Effect of viscoelasticity on the soft-wall transition and turbulence in a microchannel. J. Fluid Mech. 812, 10761118.Google Scholar
Theofilis, V. 2011 Global linear instability. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 319352.Google Scholar
Verma, M. K. S. & Kumaran, V. 2012 A dynamical instability due to fluid-wall coupling lowers the transition Reynolds number in the flow through a flexible tube. J. Fluid Mech. 705, 322347.Google Scholar
Verma, M. K. S. & Kumaran, V. 2013 A multifold reduction in the transition Reynolds number, and ultra-fast mixing, in a micro-channel due to a dynamical instability induced by a soft wall. J. Fluid Mech. 727, 407455.Google Scholar
Verma, M. K. S. & Kumaran, V. 2015 Stability of flow in a soft tube deformed due to applied pressure gradient. Phys. Rev. E 91, 043001.Google Scholar
Weideman, J. A. & Reddy, S. C. 2000 A Matlab differentiation matrix suite. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 26, 465519.Google Scholar
Yeo, K. S. & Dowling, A. P. 1987 The stability of inviscid flows over passive compliant walls. J. Fluid Mech. 183, 265292.Google Scholar