Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T18:17:02.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responses of Bingham-plastic muddy seabed to a surface solitary wave

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2009

I-CHI CHAN  and
PHILIP L.-F. LIU
I-CHI CHAN
Affiliation:
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
PHILIP L.-F. LIU*
Affiliation:
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA Institute of Hydrological and Oceanic Sciences, National Central University, Jhongli, Taiwan
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the dynamics of muddy-seabed motions induced by a surface solitary wave. The muddy seabed is characterized as Bingham-plastic mud. We focus our attention on the situations where the horizontal scale of the wave-induced mud flow is much larger than the vertical scale. The thickness of the mud layer is also assumed to be much smaller than the water depth above. With these simplifications, the dynamic pressure in the mud column remains a constant and the vertical displacement of the water–mud interface is negligible. The horizontal gradient of the wave-induced dynamic pressure along the water–seabed interface drives the motions in the mud bed. For a Bingham-plastic muddy seafloor, the mud moves either like a solid (plug flow) or like a viscous fluid (shear flow) depending on whether the magnitude of shear stress is in excess of the yield stress. Velocities inside these two different flow regimes and the location(s) of the yield surface(s) vary in time as functions of water–mud interfacial pressure gradient and the properties of the Bingham-plastic mud. A semi-analytical approach is developed in this paper to analyse the motions inside the mud bed under a surface solitary wave loading. Three possible scenarios are discussed to illustrate the complexity of the seafloor responses. The formula for the damping rate caused by the energy dissipation inside the muddy seabed is also derived. Using realistic values of the physical parameters, the present results for damping rate agree qualitatively with the available field observations.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 618 , 10 January 2009 , pp. 155 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balmforth, N. J. & Craster, R. V. 1999 A consistent thin-layer theory for Bingham plastics. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 84, 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balmforth, N. J. & Craster, R. V. 2001 Geophysical aspects of non-Newtonian fluid mechanics. In Geomorphological Fluid Dynamics (ed. Provencale, A. & Balmforth, N.). Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 582, pp. 34–51. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balmforth, N. J., Forterre, Y. & Pouliquen, O. 2008 The viscoplastic Stokes layer. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalrymple, R. A. & Liu, P. L.-F. 1978 Waves over soft muds: a two layer model. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 8, 1121–1131.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgar, S. & Raubenheimer, B. 2008 Wave dissipation by muddy seafloors. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L07611, doi:10.1029/2008GL033245.Google Scholar
Forristall, G. Z. & Reece, A. M. 1985 Measurements of wave attenuation due to a soft bottom: the SWAMP experiment. J. Geophys. Res. 90, 3367–3380.Google Scholar
Gade, H. G. 1958 Effects of a non-rigid, impermeable bottom on plane surface waves in shallow water. J. Mar. Res. 16, 61–82.Google Scholar
Healy, T., Wang, Y. & Healy, H.-J. 2002 Muddy Coasts of the World: Processes, Deposits and Function. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Krone, R. B. 1963 A study of rheologic properties of estuarial sediments. Tech. Bull. No. 7, Committee on Tidal Hydraulics, U S Army Corps of Engineers.Google Scholar
Liu, P. L.-F., Park, Y. S. & Cowen, E. A. 2007 Boundary layer flow and bed shear stress under a solitary wave. J. Fluid Mech. 574, 449–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, P. L.-F. & Chan, I-C. 2007 On long-wave propagation over a fluid-mud seabed. J. Fluid Mech. 579, 467–480.Google Scholar
MacPherson, H. 1980 The attenuation of water waves over a non-rigid bed. J. Fluid Mech. 97, 721–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massel, S. R. 1996 Ocean Surface Waves: Their Physics and Prediction. World Scientific.Google Scholar
Mathew, J., Baba, M. & Kurian, N. 1995 Mudbanks of the southwest coast of India I: Wave characteristics. J. Coastal Res. 11, 168–178.Google Scholar
Mei, C. C. 1995 Mathematical Analysis in Engineering. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mei, C. C. & Liu, K.-F. 1987 A Bingham-plastic model for a muddy seabed under long waves. J. Geophys. Res. 92, 14581–14594.Google Scholar
Mei, C. C., Liu, K.-F. & Yuhi, M. 2001 Mud flows – slow and fast. In Geomorphological Fluid Dynamics (ed. Provencale, A. & Balmforth, N.). Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 582, pp. 548–578. Springer.Google Scholar
Mei, C. C., Stiassnie, M. & Yue, D. K.-P. 2005 Theory and Applications of Ocean Surface Waves. World Scientific.Google Scholar
Ng, C.-O. 2000 Water waves over a muddy bed: a two-layer Stokes' boundary layer model. Coastal Engng. 40, 221–242.Google Scholar
Park, Y. S., Liu, P. L.-F. & Clark, S. 2008 Viscous flows in a muddy seabed induced by a solitary wave. J. Fluid Mech. 598, 383–392.Google Scholar
Wells, J. T. & Coleman, J. M. 1981 Physical processes and fine-grained sediment dynamics, coast of Surinam, South America. J. Sed. Pet. 51, 1053–1068.Google Scholar
Winterwerp, J. C., de Graf, R. F., Groeneweg, J. & Luojendijk, A. P. 2007 Modeling of wave damping at Guyana mud coast. Coastal Engng 54, 249–261.Google Scholar