Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T01:57:11.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Polymer mixing in shear-driven turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2007

T. VAITHIANATHAN
Affiliation:
Sibley School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853–7501, USA
ASHISH ROBERT
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical & Nuclear Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
JAMES G. BRASSEUR
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical & Nuclear Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
LANCE R. COLLINS*
Affiliation:
Sibley School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853–7501, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. [email protected]

Abstract

We investigate numerically the influence of polymer mixing on shear-driven turbulence. Of particular interest is the suppression of mixing that accompanies drag reduction with dilute polymer solutions. The simulations use the finite extensible nonlinear elastic model with the Peterlin closure (FENE-P) to describe the polymer stresses in the momentum equation, with polymer concentration allowed to vary in space and time. A thin slab of concentrated polymer was placed in an initially Newtonian homogeneous turbulent shear flow on a plane perpendicular to the mean velocity gradient, and allowed to mix in the gradient direction while actively altering the turbulence. The initially higher concentration of polymer near the centreplane suppressed production of turbulent kinetic energy and Reynolds stress in that region, while turbulence outside the polymer-rich region remained shear-dominated Newtonian turbulence. The rate of mixing in the shear direction was severely damped by the action of the polymer compared to a passive scalar in the corresponding Newtonian turbulent shear flow. This, in part, was a result of the same damping of vertical velocity fluctuations by the polymer that leads to the suppression of momentum flux. However, the cross-correlation between the polymer concentration and vertical velocity fluctuations was also suppressed, indicating that the explanation for the reduction in polymer mixing involves both the suppression of vertical velocity fluctuations and an alteration of turbulence structure by the polymer–turbulence interactions.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Present address: Clear Science Corp., 663 Owego Hill Rd., Harford, NY 13784-0233, USA

References

REFERENCES

Bewersdorff, H. W., Gry, A., Hoyer, K. & Tsinobėr, A. 1993 An investigation of possible mechanisms of heterogeneous drag reduction in pipe and channel flows. Rheologica Acta 32, 140149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, R. B., Armstrong, R. C. & Hassager, O. 1987 Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids, 2nd edn, Volume 2. Wiley.Google Scholar
Bonn, D., Amarouchene, Y., Wagner, C., Douady, S. & Cadot, O. 2005 Turbulent drag reduction by polymers. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17, S1195S1202.Google Scholar
Cadot, O., Bonn, D. & Douday, S. 1998 Turbulent drag reduction in a closed flow system: Boundary layer versus bulk effects. Phys. Fluids 10, 426436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, Y. I. & Hartnett, J. P. 1982 Heat transfer in flows with drag reduction. Adv. Heat Transfer 15, 59139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Angelis, E., Casciola, C. M., Benzi, R. & Piva, R. 2005 Homogeneous isotropic turbulence in dilute polymers. J. Fluid Mech. 531, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delo, C. D., Kelso, R. M. & Smits, A. J. 2004 Three-dimensional structure of a low-Reynolds-number turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 512, 4783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitropoulos, C. D., Dubief, Y., Shaqfeh, E. S. G., Moin, P. & Lele, S. K. 2005 Direct numerical simulation of polymer-induced drag reduction in turbulent boundary layer flow. Phys. Fluids 17, 011705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitropoulos, C. D., Dubief, Y., Shaqfeh, E. S. G., Moin, P. & Lele, S. K. 2006 Direct numerical simulation of polymer-induced drag reduction in turbulent boundary layer flow of inhomogeneous polymer solutions. J. Fluid Mech. 566, 153162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubief, Y., White, C. M., Terrapon, V. E., Shaqfeh, E. S. G., Moin, P. & Lele, S. K. 2004 On the coherent drag-reducing and turbulence-enhancing behaviour of polymers in wall flows. J. Fluid Mech. 514, 271280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, V. K., Sureshkumar, R. & Khomami, B. 2005 Passive scalar transport in polymer drag-reduced turbulent channel flow. AIChE J. 51, 19381950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M. J., Kim, J. & Moin, P. 1990 Structure of turbulence at high shear rate. J. Fluid Mech. 216, 561583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
L'vov, V. S., Pomyalov, A., Procaccia, I. & Tiberkevich, V. 2004 Drag reduction by polymers in wall bounded turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 244503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McComb, W. D. & Rabie, L. H. 1982 Local drag reduction due to injection of polymer solutions into turbulent flow in a pipe. AIChE J. 28, 547557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Min, T., Yoo, J. Y., Choi, H. & Joseph, D. D. 2003 Drag reduction by polymer additives in a turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 486, 213238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterlin, A. 1961 Streaming birefringence of soft linear macromolecules with finite chain length. Polymer 2, 257264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrie, H. L. & Fontaine, A. A. 1996 Comparison of turbulent boundary layer modification with slot-injected and homogeneous drag-reducing polymer solutions. In ASME Fluid Engineering Division Summer Meeting, FED 237, pp. 205–210.Google Scholar
Ptasinski, P. K., Boersma, B. J., Nieuwstadt, F. T. M., Hulsen, M. A., Van den Brule, B. H. A. A. & Hunt, J. C. R. 2003 Turbulent channel flow near maximum drag reduction: Simulations, experiments and mechanisms. J. Fluid Mech. 490, 251291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert, A., Vaithianathan, T., Collins, L. R. & Brasseur, J. G. 2007 Fundamental physics underlying polymer drag reduction from DNS of homogeneous turbulence with the FENE-P model. J. Fluid Mech. (in review).Google Scholar
Rogallo, R. S. 1981 Numerical experiments in homogeneous turbulence. Technical Report 81315. NASA.Google Scholar
Somandepalli, V. S. R. 2006 Combined PIV and PLIF measurements in a polymer drag reduced turbulent boundary layer. PhD thesis Stanford University.Google Scholar
Sureshkumar, R. & Beris, A. N. 1995 Effect of artificial stress diffusivity on the stability of numerical calculations and the flow dynamics of time-dependent viscoelastic flows. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 60, 5380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sureshkumar, R., Beris, A. N. & Handler, R. A. 1997 Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow of a polymer solution. Phys. Fluids 9, 743755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaithianathan, T. & Collins, L. R. 2003 Numerical approach to simulating turbulent flow of a viscoelastic polymer solution. J. Comput. Phys. 187, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaithianathan, T., Robert, A., Brasseur, J. G. & Collins, L. R. 2006 An improved algorithm for simulating three-dimensional, viscoelastic turbulence. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 140, 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virk, P. S. 1975 Drag reduction fundamentals. AIChE J. 21, 625656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeung, P. K., Brasseur, J. G. & Bell, D. M. 1993 Evolution of passive scalar sources in a numerically simulated boundary layer. In Near Wall Turbulent Flows (ed. So, R. M. C., Speziale, C. G. & Launder, B. E.), pp. 307316. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Yeung, P. K., Sykes, M. C. & Vedula, P. 2000 Direct numerical simulation of differential diffusion with Schmidt number up to 4.0. Phys. Fluids 12, 16011604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, H. K. & Ghajar, A. J. 1987 Heat eddy diffusivity for viscoelastic turbulent pipe flow. Intl Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 14, 237249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar