Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T10:42:55.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On vortex/wave interactions. Part 2. Originating from axisymmetric flow with swirl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

T. Allen ,
S. N. Brown  and
F. T. Smith
T. Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University College, Gower Street, London WC1E6BT, UK
S. N. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University College, Gower Street, London WC1E6BT, UK
F. T. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University College, Gower Street, London WC1E6BT, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Following the study in Part 1 of cross-flow and other non-symmetric effects on vortex/wave interactions in boundary layers, the present Part 2 applies the ideas of Part 1 and related works to an incident axisymmetric flow supplemented by a small swirl or azimuthal velocity. This is with a view to possibly increasing understanding of vortex breakdown. The wave components involved are predominantly inviscid Rayleigh-like ones. The presence of the swirl leads to extra features and complications associated mainly with extra logarithmic contributions but for the dominant interactions essentially the same equations as in Part 1 are found. These dominant nonlinear interactions must be based on azimuthal wavenumbers of ± 1 in the case of the Squire jet with swirl. In contrast to Part 1, which consisted mainly of an analysis of the quasi-bounded solutions, a representative set of numerical solutions of the full integro-differential amplitude equations is presented, for realistic axial and swirl velocity profiles. The work points also to the influence of further increases in the incident swirl.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 325 , 25 October 1996 , pp. 145 - 161
Copyright
© 1996 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K. & Gill, A. E. 1962 Analysis of the stability of axisymmetric jets. J. Fluid Mech. 14, 529–551.Google Scholar
Brown, S. N., Leibovich, S. & Yang, Z. 1990 On the linear instability of the Hall-Stewartson vortex. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 2, 27–46.Google Scholar
Brown, S. N. & Smith, F. T. 1996 On vortex/wave interactions. Part 1. Non-symmetrical input and cross-flow in boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 307, 101–133.Google Scholar
Burggraf, O. R. & Foster, M. R. 1977 Continuation or breakdown in tornado-like vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 80, 685–703.Google Scholar
Churilov, S. M. & Shukhman, I. G. 1994 Nonlinear spatial evolution of helical disturbances to an axial jet. J. Fluid Mech. 281, 371–402.Google Scholar
Davis, D. A. R. & Smith, F. T. 1994 Influence of cross-flow on nonlinear Tollmien—Schlichting/vortex interaction. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 446, 319–340.Google Scholar
Duck, P. W. 1986 The inviscid stability of swirling flows: large wavenumber disturbances. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 37, 340–360.Google Scholar
Foster, M. R. & Smith, F. T. 1988 Stability of Long's vortex at large flow force. J. Fluid Mech. 206, 405–432.Google Scholar
Hall, P. & Smith, F. T. 1991 On strongly nonlinear vortex/wave interactions in boundary-layer transition. J. Fluid Mech. 227, 641–666.Google Scholar
Leibovich, S. & Stewartson, K. 1983 A sufficient condition for instability of columnar vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 126, 335–356.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T., Brown, S. N. & Brown, P. G. 1993 Initiation of three-dimensional nonlinear transition paths from an inflexional profile. Eur. J. Mech. B 12, 447–473 (referred to herein as SBB).Google Scholar