Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T12:23:51.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the relevance of the potential-difference method for turbulence measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

A. Tsinober
Affiliation:
Department of Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, Faculty of Engineering, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel-Aviv, 69978, Israel
E. Kit
Affiliation:
Department of Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, Faculty of Engineering, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel-Aviv, 69978, Israel
M. Teitel
Affiliation:
Department of Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, Faculty of Engineering, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel-Aviv, 69978, Israel

Abstract

Precise theoretical relations between statistical characteristics of turbulent velocity and an electrical field are found for homogeneous and isotropic turbulence in the presence of a uniform magnetic field. These include turbulence intensities, correlations and spectra and relations allowing estimation of the degree of anisotropy of a turbulent flow. The theoretical results are verified by experiments with flow of very dilute salted water past a grid in the presence of a uniform magnetic field. The theoretical and the experimental results are in good agreement. Preliminary results of vorticity measurements are also presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1987 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, R. C. 1971 On the electromagnetic vortex probe. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 4, 99101Google Scholar
Baker, R. C. 1983 A review of recent developments in electromagnetic flow measurement. Prog. Astronaut. Aeronaut. 84, 225259.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1953 The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence. Cambridge University Press.
Batchelor, G. K. & Townsend, A. A. 1947 Decay of vorticity in isotopic turbulence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 190, 534550.Google Scholar
Grossman, L. M., Li, H. & Einstein, H. 1958 Turbulence in civil engineering. Investigation of liquid shear flow by electromagnetic induction. J. Hydraul. Div. ASCE 83. 1–15.Google Scholar
Hinze, T. O. 1974 Turbulence. McGraw Hill.
Kármán, T. von & Howarth, L. 1938 On the statistical theory of isotropic turbulence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 164, 192215.Google Scholar
Kit, L. G. 1970 Turbulent velocity fluctuation measurements using a conduction anemometer with three-electrode probe. Magnetohydrodyn. 6, 480487.Google Scholar
Kolesnikov, Yu. B. & Tsinober, A. B. 1972 Two dimensional turbulent flow behind a circular cylinder. Magnetohydrodyn. 8, 300307.Google Scholar
Lancaster, R. W. 1985 Current profiling in near real time. Sea-Technol. 26, No. 2, 24–28.Google Scholar
Ricou, R. & Vives, C. 1982 Local velocity and mass transfer measurement in molten metals using an incorporated magnet probe. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 25, 15791588.Google Scholar
Shercliff, J. A. 1962 The Theory of Electromagnetic Flow Measurement. Cambridge University Press.
Tan-Atichat, T., Nagib, H. M. & Loehrke, R. L. 1982 Interaction of free-stream turbulence with screens and grids: a balance between turbulence scales. J. Fluid Mech. 114, 501528.Google Scholar
Weissenfluh, T. von 1985 Probes for local velocity and temperature measurements in liquid metal flow. Intl. J. Heat Mass Transfer 28, 15631574.Google Scholar