Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T17:58:02.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dense shallow granular flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2014

V. Kumaran*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

Simplified equations are derived for a granular flow in the ‘dense’ limit where the volume fraction is close to that for dynamical arrest, and the ‘shallow’ limit where the stream-wise length for flow development ($\def \xmlpi #1{}\def \mathsfbi #1{\boldsymbol {\mathsf {#1}}}\let \le =\leqslant \let \leq =\leqslant \let \ge =\geqslant \let \geq =\geqslant \def \Pr {\mathit {Pr}}\def \Fr {\mathit {Fr}}\def \Rey {\mathit {Re}}L$) is large compared with the cross-stream height ($h$). The mass and diameter of the particles are set equal to 1 in the analysis without loss of generality. In the dense limit, the equations are simplified by taking advantage of the power-law divergence of the pair distribution function $\chi $ proportional to $(\phi _{ad} - \phi )^{- \alpha }$, and a faster divergence of the derivative $\rho (\mathrm{d} \chi / \mathrm{d} \rho ) \sim (\mathrm{d} \chi / \mathrm{d} \phi )$, where $\rho $ and $\phi $ are the density and volume fraction, and $\phi _{ad}$ is the volume fraction for arrested dynamics. When the height $h$ is much larger than the conduction length, the energy equation reduces to an algebraic balance between the rates of production and dissipation of energy, and the stress is proportional to the square of the strain rate (Bagnold law). In the shallow limit, the stress reduces to a simplified Bagnold stress, where all components of the stress are proportional to $(\partial u_x/\partial y)^2$, which is the cross-stream ($y$) derivative of the stream-wise ($x$) velocity. In the simplified equations for dense shallow flows, the inertial terms are neglected in the $y$ momentum equation in the shallow limit because the are $O(h/L)$ smaller than the divergence of the stress. The resulting model contains two equations, a mass conservation equations which reduces to a solenoidal condition on the velocity in the incompressible limit, and a stream-wise momentum equation which contains just one parameter $\mathcal{B}$ which is a combination of the Bagnold coefficients and their derivatives with respect to volume fraction. The leading-order dense shallow flow equations, as well as the first correction due to density variations, are analysed for two representative flows. The first is the development from a plug flow to a fully developed Bagnold profile for the flow down an inclined plane. The analysis shows that the flow development length is $(\bar{\rho }h^3 / \mathcal{B})$, where $\bar{\rho }$ is the mean density, and this length is numerically estimated from previous simulation results. The second example is the development of the boundary layer at the base of the flow when a plug flow (with a slip condition at the base) encounters a rough base, in the limit where the momentum boundary layer thickness is small compared with the flow height. Analytical solutions can be found only when the stream-wise velocity far from the surface varies as $x^F$, where $x$ is the stream-wise distance from the start of the rough base and $F$ is an exponent. The boundary layer thickness increases as $(l^2 x)^{1/3}$ for all values of $F$, where the length scale $l = \sqrt{2 \mathcal{B}/ \bar{\rho }}$. The analysis reveals important differences between granular flows and the flows of Newtonian fluids. The Reynolds number (ratio of inertial and viscous terms) turns out to depend only on the layer height and Bagnold coefficients, and is independent of the flow velocity, because both the inertial terms in the conservation equations and the divergence of the stress depend on the square of the velocity/velocity gradients. The compressibility number (ratio of the variation in volume fraction and mean volume fraction) is independent of the flow velocity and layer height, and depends only on the volume fraction and Bagnold coefficients.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2014 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, M. P. & Tildesley, D. J. 1992 Computer Simulation of Liquids. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Baran, O., Ertas, D., Halsey, T. C., Grest, G. S. & Lechman, J. B. 2006 Velocity correlations in dense gravity-driven granular chute flow. Phys. Rev. E 74, 051302.Google ScholarPubMed
Berzi, D. & Jenkins, J. T. 2011 Surface flows of inelastic spheres. Phys. Fluids 23, 013303.Google Scholar
Brey, J. J., Ruiz-Montero, M. J. & Moreno, F. 2001 Hydrodynamics of an open vibrated granular system. Phys. Rev. E 63, 061305; 061314.Google ScholarPubMed
Campbell, C. S. 2002 Granular shear flows at the elastic limit. J. Fluid Mech. 465, 261291.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. S. 2005 Stress-controlled elastic granular shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 539, 273297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, C. S. 2011 Clusters in dense-inertial granular flows. J. Fluid Mech. 687, 341359.Google Scholar
Chialvo, S., Sun, J. & Sundaresan, S. 2012 Bridging the rheology of granular flows in three regimes. Phys. Rev. E 85, 021305.Google Scholar
Cole, D. M. & Peters, J. F. 2007 A physically based approach to granular media mechanics: grain-scale experiments, initial results and implications to numerical modeling. Granul. Matt. 9, 309321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, D. M. & Peters, J. F. 2008 Grain-scale mechanics of geologic materials and lunar simulants under normal loading. Granul. Matt. 10, 171185.Google Scholar
Cundall, P. A. & Strack, O. D. L. 1979 A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29, 4765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ertas, D. & Halsey, T. C. 2002 Granular gravitational collapse and chute flow. Europhys. Lett. 60, 931937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GDR MiDi,   2004 On dense granular flows. Eur. Phys. J. E 14, 341365.Google Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T., Wieland, M. & Hutter, K. 1999 Gravity driven free surface flow of granular avalanches over complex basal topography. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 455, 18411874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halsey, T. C. 2009 Motion of packings of frictional grains. Phys. Rev. E 80, 011303.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. T. 2006 Dense shearing flows of inelastic disks. Phys. Fluids 18, 103307.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. T. 2007 Dense inclined flows of inelastic spheres. Granul. Matt. 10, 4752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J. T. & Richman, M. W. 1985 Grad’s 13-moment system for a dense gas of inelastic spheres. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 87, 355377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J. T. & Savage, S. B. 1983 A theory for the rapid flow of identical, smooth, nearly elastic particles. J. Fluid Mech. 130, 186202.Google Scholar
Jop, P., Forterre, Y. & Pouliquen, O. 2006 A constitutive law for dense granular flows. Nature 441, 727730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khakhar, D. V., Orpe, A., Andersen, P. & Ottino, J. M. 2001 Surface flow of granular materials: model and experiments in heap formation. J. Fluid Mech. 441, 255264.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V. 1998 Temperature of a granular material fluidised by external vibrations. Phys. Rev. E 57, 56605664.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V. 2004 Constitutive relations and linear stability of a sheared granular flow. J. Fluid Mech. 506, 143.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V. 2006a The constitutive relations for the granular flow of rough particles, and its application to the flow down an inclined plane. J. Fluid Mech. 561, 142.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V. 2006b Kinetic theory for the density plateau in the granular flow down an inclined plane. Europhys. Lett. 73, 17.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V. 2006c Velocity autocorrelations and the viscosity renormalisation in sheared granular flows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 258002.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V. 2008 Dense granular flow down an inclined plane – from kinetic theory to granular dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 599, 120168.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V. 2009a Dynamics of dense sheared granular flows. Part I: structure and diffusion. J. Fluid Mech. 632, 109144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumaran, V. 2009b Dynamics of dense sheared granular flows. Part II: the relative velocity distribution. J. Fluid Mech. 632, 145198.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V. 2009c Dynamics of a dilute sheared inelastic fluid. I. Hydrodynamic modes and the velocity correlation functions. Phys. Rev. E 79, 011301.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V. 2009d Dynamics of a dilute sheared inelastic fluid. II. The effect of correlations. Phys. Rev. E 79, 011302.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V. & Bharathraj, S. 2013 The effect of base roughness on the development of a dense granular flow down an inclined plane. Phys. Fluids 25, 070604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumaran, V. & Maheshwari, S. 2012 Transition due to base roughness in the dense granular flow down an inclined plane. Phys. Fluids 24, 053302.Google Scholar
Lagree, P.-Y., Staron, L. & Popinet, S. 2011 The granular column collapse as a continuum: validity of a two-dimensional Navier–Stokes model with a $\mu (I)$ rheology. J. Fluid Mech. 686, 378408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louge, M.-Y. 2003 Model for dense granular flows down bumpy surfaces. Phys. Rev. E 67, 061303.Google Scholar
Louge, M.-Y. 2012 ‘Phonon’ conductivity along a column of spheres in contact. Granul. Matt. 14, 203208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louge, M.-Y. & Keast, S. C. 2001 On dense transition due to base roughness in the dense granular flow down an inclined plane. Phys. Fluids 24, 053302.Google Scholar
Lun, C. K. K., Savage, S. B., Jeffrey, D. J. & Chepurniy, N. 1984 Kinetic theories for granular flow: inelastic particles in Couette flow and slightly inelastic particles in a general flow field. J. Fluid Mech. 140, 223256.Google Scholar
Maheshwari, S. & Kumaran, V. 2012 The effect of base dissipation on the granular flow down an inclined plane. Granul. Matt. 14, 209213.Google Scholar
Orpe, A. V. & Khakhar, D. V. 2007 Rheology of surface granular flows. J. Fluid Mech. 571, 132.Google Scholar
Orpe, A. V., Kumaran, V., Reddy, K. A. & Kudrolli, A. 2008 Fast decay of the velocity autocorrelation function in dense shear flow of inelastic hard spheres. Europhys. Lett. 84, 64003.Google Scholar
Peyneau, P.-E. & Roux, J.-N. 2008 Frictionless bead packs have macroscopic friction, but no dilatancy. Phys. Rev. E 78, 011307.Google Scholar
Pouliquen, O. 1999 Scaling laws in granular flows down rough inclined planes. Phys. Fluids 11, 542548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, K. A. & Kumaran, V. 2007 Applicability of constitutive relations from kinetic theory for dense granular flows. Phys. Rev. E 76, 061305.Google ScholarPubMed
Reddy, K. A. & Kumaran, V. 2010 Dense granular flow down an inclined plane: a comparison between the hard particle model and soft particle simulations. Phys. Fluids 22, 113302.Google Scholar
Savage, S. B. & Hutter, K. 1989 The motion of a finite mass of granular material down a rough incline. J. Fluid Mech. 199, 177215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, S. B. & Hutter, K. 1991 The dynamics of avalanches of granular materials from initiation to runout. Part I: analysis. Acta Mechanica 86, 201223.Google Scholar
Savage, S. B. & Jeffrey, D. J. 1981 The stress tensor in a granular flow at high shear rates. J. Fluid Mech. 110, 255272.Google Scholar
Schlichting, H. & Gersten, K. 2000 Boundary-Layer Theory. Springer.Google Scholar
Sela, N. & Goldhirsch, I. 1998 Hydrodynamic equations for rapid flows of smooth inelastic spheres, to Burnett order. J. Fluid Mech. 361, 4174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sela, N., Goldhirsch, I. & Noskowicz, S. H. 1996 Kinetic theoretical study of a simply sheared two-dimensional granular gas to Burnett order. Phys. Fluids 8, 23372353.Google Scholar
Senthil Kumar, V. & Kumaran, V. 2005 Voronoi cell volume distribution and configurational entropy of hard spheres. J. Chem. Phys. 123, 114501.Google Scholar
Silbert, L. E., Ertas, D., Grest, G. S., Halsey, T. C., Levine, D. & Plimpton, S. J. 2001 Granular flow down an inclined plane: Bagnold scaling and rheology. Phys. Rev. E 64, 051302.Google Scholar
Soto, R., Mareschal, M. & Risso, D. 1999 Departure from Fourier’s law for fluidized granular media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 50035006.Google Scholar
Torquato, S. 1995 Nearest neighbour statistics for packings of hard disks and spheres. Phys. Rev. E 51, 31703182.Google Scholar
Walton, O. R. 1993 Numerical simulation of inclined chute flows of monodisperse, inelastic, frictional spheres. Mech. Mater. 16, 239247.Google Scholar
Weinhart, T., Thornton, A. R., Luding, S. & Bokhove, O. 2012 Closure relations for shallow granular flows from particle simulations. Granul. Matt. 14, 531552.Google Scholar