Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T20:42:45.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analytical study of the direct initiation of gaseous detonations for small heat release

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2020

Paul Clavin Open the ORCID record for Paul Clavin [Opens in a new window]  and
Bruno Denet Open the ORCID record for Bruno Denet [Opens in a new window]
Paul Clavin*
Affiliation:
Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, IRPHE UMR7342, 49 Rue F. Joliot Curie, 13384 Marseille, France
Bruno Denet
Affiliation:
Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, Centrale Marseille, IRPHE UMR7342, 49 Rue F. Joliot Curie, 13384 Marseille, France
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An analysis of the direct initiation of gaseous detonations in a spherical geometry is presented. The full set of constitutive equations is analysed by an asymptotic analysis in the double limit of Mach number close to unity (small heat release) and large thermal sensitivity. The quasi-steady curvature-induced quenching phenomenon is first revisited in this limit. Considering a realistic decrease rate of the rarefaction wave, the unsteady problem is reduced to a single nonlinear hyperbolic equation. The time-dependent velocity of the lead shock is an eigenfunction of the problem when two boundary conditions are imposed to the flow at the lead shock and at the burnt gas side. Following (Liñan et al., C. R. Méc., vol. 340, 2012, pp. 829–844), the boundary condition in the quasi-transonic flow of burnt gas is expressed in terms of the curvature. Focusing our attention on successful initiation, the time-dependent velocity of the lead shock of a detonation approaching the Chapman–Jouguet regime is the solution of a nonlinear integral equation investigated for stable and marginally unstable detonations. By comparison with the quasi-steady trajectories in the phase space ‘propagation velocity versus radius’, the solution exhibits the unsteady effect produced upon the detonation decay by the long time delay of the upstream-running mode for transferring the rarefaction-wave-induced deceleration across the inner detonation structure from the burnt gas to the lead shock. In addition, a new and intriguing phenomenon concerning pulsating detonations is described. Even if the results are not quantitatively accurate, they are qualitatively relevant for real detonations.

JFM classification

Reacting Flows: Detonations Compressible Flows: Detonation waves
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 897 , 25 August 2020 , A30
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clavin, P. & Denet, B. 2018 Decay of plane detonation waves to the self-propagating Chapman–Jouguet regime. J. Fluid Mech. 845, 170–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clavin, P. & He, L. 1996 Stability and nonlinear dynamics of one-dimensional overdriven detonations in gases. J. Fluid Mech. 306, 353–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clavin, P. & Searby, G. 2016 Combustion Waves and Fronts in Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clavin, P. & Williams, F. A. 2002 Dynamics of planar gaseous detonations near Chapman–Jouguet conditions for small heat release. Combust. Theor. Model. 6, 127–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clavin, P. & Williams, F. A. 2009 Multidimensional stability analysis of gaseous detonations near chapman-jouguet conditions for small heat release. J. Fluid Mech. 624, 125–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, W. 1943 On detonation processes in gases. Ann. Phys. 43, 421–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ecket, C. A., Quirk, J. J. & Shepherd, J. E. 2000 The role of unstedeadness in direct initiation of gaseous detonations. J. Fluid Mech. 42, 147–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faria, L., Kasimov, A. & Rosales, R. 2015 Theory of weakly nonlinear self-sustained detonations. J. Fluid Mech. 784, 163–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fickett, W. & Davis, W. C. 1979 Detonation. University of California Press.Google Scholar
He, L. 1996 Theoretical determination of the critical conditions for the direct initiation of detonations in hydrogen-oxygen mixtures. Combust. Flame 104, 401–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, L. & Clavin, P. 1994 On the direct initiation of gaseous detonations by an energy source. J. Fluid Mech. 277, 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korobeinikov, P. V. 1971 Gas dynamics of explosions. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 3, 317–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. H. S. 1977 Initiation of gaseous detonations. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 28, 75–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. H. S. 1984 Dynamic parameters of gaseous detonations. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 16, 311–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. H. S. & Higgins, A. J. 1999 Comments on criteria for direct initiation of detonation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 357, 3503–3521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liñan, A., Kurdyumov, V. & Sanchez, A. L. 2012 Initiation of reactive blast waves by external energy source. C. R. Méc. 340, 829–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedov, L. I. 1946 Propagation of strong blast waves. Prikl. Mat. Mekh. 10, 241–250.Google Scholar
Short, M. & Bdzil, J. B. 2003 Propagation laws for steady curved detonations with chain-branching kinetics. J. Fluid Mech. 479, 39–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, D. S. & Kasimov, A. R. 2005 Theory of detonation with an embedded sonic locus. SIAM J. Appl. Maths 66 (2), 384–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1950a The dynamics of combustion products behind plane and spherical detonation fronts. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 200, 235–247.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1950b The formation of a blast wave by a very intense explosion. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 201, 159–174.Google Scholar
Vieille, P. 1900 Structure des détonations. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 131, 413–416.Google Scholar
Von Neumann, J.1942 Theory of detonation waves. Progress Report OSRD-549. National Defense Research Committee Div. B.Google Scholar
Wood, W. W. & Kirkwood, J. G. 1954 Diameter effect in condensed explosives. the relation between velocity and radius of the detonation wave. J. Chem. Phys. 22, 1920–1924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, J. & Stewart, D. S. 1995 On the normal shock velocity curvature relationship for materials with large activation energy. Combust. Flame 100, 519–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeldovich, Y. B. 1940 On the theory of the propagation of detonations in gaseous systems. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 10, 542–568.Google Scholar
Zeldovich, Y. B. 1942 On the distribution of pressure and velocity in products of detonation blasts, in particular for spherical propagating detonation waves. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 12, 389–406.Google Scholar
Zeldovich, Y. B., Kogarko, S. M. & Simonov, N. 1956 An experimental investigation of spherical detonations of gases. Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys. 1 (8), 1689–1713.Google Scholar
Zeldovich, Y. B. & Kompaneets, A. S. 1960 Theory of Detonation. Academic Press.Google Scholar