Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T21:11:51.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comment: Regulatory Reform for the Deposit Financial Institutions–Retrospect and Prospects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Extract

The central theme of the paper by Professor Phillips is the effects of technological change on the way financial institutions operate and the implications for regulation. His analysis is an excellent combination of both sound economics and political economy. Increasingly, shifts are made between noninterest-bearing demand deposits and interestbearing savings deposits. The increased use of negotiable order of withdrawal (NOW) accounts represents a step toward permitting interest on demand deposits. The implications of the increased use of “electronic funds transfer system” (EFTS) are even greater. Professor Phillips indicates the EFTS could make all marketable and negotiable assets “money,” and that the turnover of deposits could approach “infinity.”

Type
Reform of Financial Institutions and Markets: A Progress Evaluation
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Norton, Frank E. and Jacoby, Neil H., Bank Deposits and Legal Reserve Requirements, (University of California Press, Los Angeles, 1959)Google Scholar. Jacoby, Neil H., “The Structure and Use of Variable Bank Reserve Requirements,” in Banking and Monetary Studies, edited by Carson, Deane, (R. D. Irwin, Inc., 1963), pp. 213233.Google Scholar